My Tripod Page

· Animal breeders, like the multinational Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc.
· Manufacturers of feed, cages, restraining devices, surgical instruments, etc.
· Politicians receiving large sums from the vivisection lobbies bent on keeping the profitable system alive and growing.
· The pharmaceutical companies, who require scapegoats for the poisons they palm off on a gullible world population as indispensible for health.
· The self-styled Humane societies, including the RSPCA, which have vast funds at their disposal, yet do nothing to bring about abolition.
· The larger, established AV organisations which fail to denounce vivisection on medical and scientific grounds, stating that some animal experiments are necessary -at least "for the time being".
· "Alternative Research Funds" which lull the public into thinking something is being done and that vivisection, whilst unethical and cruel, is a valid methodology. What they don’t stress is that the "alternatives" have to be validated against animal tests, which are flawed in the first place! The only alternative is abolition.


Who Would Suffer Through Abolition · Animal breeders, like the multinational Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. · Manufacturers of feed, cages, restraining devices, surgical instruments, etc. · Politicians receiving large sums from the vivisection lobbies bent on keeping the profitable system alive and growing. · The pharmaceutical companies, who require scapegoats for the poisons they palm off on a gullible world population as indispensible for health. · The self-styled Humane societies, including the RSPCA, which have vast funds at their disposal, yet do nothing to bring about abolition. · The larger, established AV organisations which fail to denounce vivisection on medical and scientific grounds, stating that some animal experiments are necessary -at least "for the time being". · "Alternative Research Funds" which lull the public into thinking something is being done and that vivisection, whilst unethical and cruel, is a valid methodology. What they don’t stress is that the "alternatives" have to be validated against animal tests, which are flawed in the first place! The only alternative is abolition.