Myth: The Net properly belongs to the People Corollary: Net Admins improperly use their power. Freedom of speech, surrendering power, the large machines - what are we talking about? Ever since a brave anthropithecan first grabbed a burning branch from a naturally caused fire, and paraded around with it, whooping as he beat the alpha males into beta status with it, it has been this way. Control implies ownership, and ownership implies control. The Internet is FAR from being the first place where this has happened. Seaship passengers routinely surrendered 'the power to punish, the power to imprison' to the captain of the ship, long before the Internet. Myth: The Internet was built for, was designed for, exists for, is driven by, or is supposed to be for, the free, open, uncensored, unrestricted exchange of information. The Internet today is an evolving work in progress. The US Government's interest in maintaining communications after being at the receiving end of an atomic bomb, contributed to the creation of the Internet, as did Bob Metcalfe's doctoral thesis on packet-based data transmission. Of course transmitting data is the whole point of the Internet, but I submit that its creators placed a higher priority in just getting it to work, period, than in getting it to work for this or that lofty purpose. Myth: The Internet encourages long established democratic governments to turn oppressive and closely control their citizens. Myth: The Internet prevents long established oppressive regimes from controlling their citizens. Logically, it can't be both, yet just as people bemoan the chilling effects of the CDA, people rejoice when people in get Internet access, because now they will be FREEEEE!!!!!! People still get the government they deserve, and the best they can afford, the Internet notwithstanding. Myth: The Constitution of the United States of America is the common law of the Internet, not only granting rights to Netizens, but actually protecting Netizens from each other. Myth: The Net is public property. Myth: Since the Net is public property, I have the right to . The Net is not public property, but even if it was, it's misguided to assume that one would have the rights people claim to have. On real, actual public properties, like parks and beaches, people don't have the right to defecate wherever, light fires, setup businesses, have sex, dispose of refuse, so why do people assume that they could let their Id go berserk on the Net, even if it *was* public property? Myth: Usenet is the Internet. It's important to remember the distinction. Usenet is carried, most of the way, on the Internet. Usenet predates the Internet. Usenet exists mostly on private equipment, and only rarely on equipment belonging to those who access Usenet. One cannot use ones perceptions about the Internet's purpose to argue that Usenet should be this or should be that. It's just not logical.