TheCrossflow
Turbine actually had two inventors. The first was the australianengineer
A. G. M. Michell, who obtained a patent for it in 1903. The turbinewas
later invented independently in Germany by the Hungarian Prof. DonatBanki
where it became known more widely between 1917 and 1919 through aseries
of publications. A working model of Banki's turbine is exhibitedin the
German Museum in Munich. It's runner is 8 inches in diameterand is
about 4 inches wide and has 40 blades.
The present more widespread use of the cross-flow turbine is largelydue to the efforts of the Ossberger concern in Weissenburg, Bavaria, whoadded a number of original ideas to Michell's design, based on their ownresearch work. The various stages of this steady development are coveredby world patents. Thousands of these Crossflow Turbines have been buildby Ossberger.
The main characteristic of the cross-flow turbine is that it usesbroad rectangular water jet of water that travels through the turbine onlyonce but travels across each rubber blade twice, once in each direction.The water flows through the runner blading first from the periphery towardsthe center. and then. after crossing the open center space. from the insideoutwards. This machine is therefore a turbine with two velocity stages,the water filling only part of the runner at any one time. As far as energyutilization is concerned, the use of two velocity stages provides no immediateadvantages. The arrangement represents, however. a very skillful designwhich removes the water in a simple manner after it has passed throughthe runner without producing any back pressure. The addition of a drafttube to the cross-flow turbine represents an implementedby Ossberger to enhance the Turbine's performance. Ossberger usesa air valve in the draft tube to help regulate the head by introducingair in the draft tube.
The machine is normally classified as an impulse or free-jet turbine.In it's original design this classification is not strictly correct sinceit was designed as a true constant-pressure turbine. A sufficiently largegap was left between the nozzle and the runner to ensure that the jet enteredthe runner without any static pressure. There was also sufficient spacein the runner itself to allow the jet to expand freely sideways. Duringthe passage through the first stage conditions were therefore essentiallythe same as in the much older Zuppinger free-jet turbine. However, thepresent design in which the nozzle is shaped to follow the runner peripheryclosely giving better results. At full or nearly full gate there is a slightpositive pressure in the gap. This can readily be demonstrated by measuringthe flow passing through the machine with and without the runner at a constanthead and gate. The flow is found to be greater if no runner is fitted inthe turbine (experiments carried out by Prof. F. Euler at the Hagen TechnicalCollege). The deviation from the constant-pressure principle must of coursebe taken into account in closing the gap between nozzle and runner. Itis only during the second passage of the water through the runner bladingthat the usual constant-pressure condition applies.
The Ossberger Crossflow was extremely popular in Europe a few yearsago. They built in excess of 4000 commercial Crossflow Turbines. They ranged to 600 feet of head, 400 CFS @ 30 feet of head and power outputsto 2500 HP.
TheCrossflow
Turbine shown here belongs to John McMillian. John has lengthenedto runner
to 66 inches to accommodate a head of 2.75 feet using 5.5 CFSof water.
He generates about 400 watts with a 14 volt modified Delcoautomotive alternator.
John has lots of construction details, picturesof his installation at his
Web Page.
![]() |
Theimpulse
turbine are medium to very high head machine. They come in a variety
of sizes from about 4 inch diameter to monsters like the 30,000Hp Allis-Chalmers
pictures here. Compared to the Frances turbinethe impulse wheels
use a lot less water but operates at much higher headpressures. The
pelton Wheel is the best example of an Impulse Wheel. It operates by one
or more jets direct water into the center of the bucketsaround the parameter
of the runner. Power is derived form the forceof water at high pressure
hitting the passing buckets, hence the term "impulse"turbine. The
other type impulse turbine is the Turgo Wheel. Even though they look quite
different from each other in principle theoperate the same. In the
Pelton wheel water is directed into theradial buckets, 90 degrees to the
shaft. In the Turgo Wheel the bucketsare replaces with U shapes blades
arranged radially on the "face" of therunner.
High Head Turbines.
Here's the basic technical explanation of how the Pelton Wheel works.
The vector diagram shows a horizontal section through one of the bucketstaken
on a plane passing through the axis of the jet. The bucket movesin a circular
path, but for the present purposewwe Will assume its pathto be a straight
line, coincident with the jet's axis, and that its velocity,U, is constant.
Twosuccessive
positions of the bucket are shown, together with the path ofthe water as
it flows over the bucket's surface. The path of the water,relative to the
bucket, is shown In dotted lines. The water leaves thebucket with a relative
velocity, v2, whose direction is tangent the bucketsurface at the point
of exit. The angle between v2 and the jet's axis,commonly called the bucket
angle, is designated by B. Due to thecombined motion of the water
over the bucket and of the bucket throughspace, the actual path
of the water is that shown by the full lines,the water leaving the bucket
with an absolute velocity, V2, at an anglea, with the jet's axis.
It is to be noted that V2 is the vectorsum of v2 and u; that the absolute
path of the water has an easier curvaturethan the surface of the bucket,
and that the angle, a, through whichthe water is deflected, is much
less than the bucket angle, B.
The velocity of the water in the original direction of the jet isreduced
from V1 to V2 cos (a) and the component, in this direction,of the
pressure exerted by the jet on the bucket is:
Px=M'(V1-V2*Cos(a)
This component is the force which causes the bucket to move withuni-form
speed against the resistance supplied by the load on the turbine.The value
of M1 is that mass of water which each second of time passesover the bucket.
The total of the separate forces simultaneously actingon each live bucket
can be obtained from the above equation if we changeM' to M, since the
combined masses flowing per second over the active bucketsequals the mass,
M, discharged per second by the nozzle. We have, therefore:Px=(Qw/g)*(V1-V2*Cos(a)
as the value of the turning force applied to the wheel and, sinceit
moves u feet per second, Pxu becomes the work done in one second orthe
power input to the shaft. It is greater than the power output fromthe shaft
by the amount lost in bearing friction and by windage. (g) isthe gravitational
constant of 32.2.Pictured below is vector diagram for a Pelton Wheel.
Note:
If blew off the above as boring then gogo back & read it again until
you understand it!!! While writtenspecifically for the Pelton Wheel,
the the interaction of V1 (Water velocity)V2( Velocity of the water as
it exits the turbine) v2 (relative velocity)& u (peripheral speed of
the runner) are the basis for ALL turbomachinery operation.

Another
type of Impulse machine is the Turgo Wheel. It is rare to find them
in commercial power plants but theyare quite popular for low voltage DC
systems using a battery bank and aninverter. A lot of these systems
are sold pre-packages (plug &play) and use an automotive alternator
, regulator & battery(s). In a few cases where higher power is required
an or an AC is generated,they're use with an alternator or an asynchronous
generator. While the majority of the Turgo systems I've found in
Internet searchesare of the 600 to 2000 Watt varieties I have found some
in the 6 KW rangealthough I'm told a few are in the Megawatt range. Both
the Pelton &Turgo wheel, depending on manufacture come with either
cast bronze or plasticrunner wheels. There is absolutely no reason
not to take advantageof the lower cost plastic wheels. Modern plastics
are very durableand ware quite well an should present no problems in installed
properly.In some installations they might require a flywheel but that more
thenlikely be a "hi-end" system and would be taken care of for you.
These Turgo Wheels do look a bit strange if your used to Frances&
Pelton machines. If the Turgo Wheel were mounted with the shaftvertical,
then the water jets would be aimed downward but tilted in thedirection
of rotation. However the water exits the wheel almost exactlyas a
Francis Turbine would.
This is the one that killed the Water Wheel. When it comesto commercial Turbines, there are and have been more of these Turbinesmade then all the others combined. The Francis Turbine dominateslarge Hydro-Electric plants all over the world. It has only one rival inand that's the Kaplin.
![]()
Very High Head Runner and Turbine Housing |
|
|
Reactions
turbines like the Francis & Kaplin turbines rely on the weight of thewater
passing through them to produce their power. The behemoth pictured
here is a 50,000 HP job. They are relatively low speed devices &their
water usage can be from moderate to huge. As far as Head pressuregoes
they run the full gamut from 2 or 3 feet to over 1000 feet. There are thousands
of Francis turbines throughout the world today. Several hundred of these
are at the base of dams you see at the many lakesaround the country.
These Francis turbines typically have an operationhead of 60-120 feet or
so. Their power output is in the range ofmegawatts. Thousands
off low to medium head Frances turbines havebeen installed all over the
world doing a variety of functions. Mostlythey powered generators
for farm & industrial use. However manyproduced direct mechanical
power for things like saw mills, grist mills,ice houses, machine shops
etc. In the late 1800's & early 1900'eon the east coast when
textiles were in their hay-day, hundreds of textilemills were scattered
along slow
moving
but large rivers. Remnants of these mills can still be foundtoday,
some still completely intact. They usually built canals toharness
the rivers flow and divert absolutely hugs quantities od waterinto low
head Frances turbines to power these mills. Virtually everypiece
od equipment in these mills were powered by one Frances turbine. The turbine
would drive literally hundreds of "jack-shafts" through themill.
Each jack-shaft would in turn supply power to several machinesvia flat
belting.
Thereare
however a few ultra high head scattered throughout mountain regions. The
1 megawatt Nantahala Power Plant near Bryson City NC is the most famousof
these high head Frances turbine. The Nantahala plants watersupply
is miles & miles away. The water flows through severalmiles of
tunnel & steel penstock 8 feet in diameter. The operating head
is a whopping 1000 feet! The runner of the Nantahalaturbine is very
narrow (short) & very wide when compared to a 100 foothead Francis
at a dam site. The Frances runner pictured above istypical of typical
proportions for a medium head (100 foot) runners.
![]() |
Diagram of the "First Frances Turbine" Low head. Not
that it does nothave compound curve blades like it's descendants.
|
|
|
Thisis
the competition for the Francis. It's used mostly at damsheads
under 100 feet. It use huge quantities of water. Thenewer Kaplin
like the read one shown are extremely efficient over a rangeof flows because
the blades are adjustable to accommodate lower flows,something no other
turbine can claim.
![]() |
![]() |
Reactions turbines like the Francis & Kaplin turbines rely onthe
weight of the water passing through them to produce their power. They are
relatively low speed devices & their water usage can be frommoderate
to huge. As far as Head pressure goes they run the fullgamut from
2 or 3 feet to over 1000 feet. There are thousands ofFrancis turbines
throughout the world today. Several hundred of theseare at the base
of dams you see at the many lakes around the country. These Francis turbines
typically have an operation head of 60-120 feetor so. Their power
output is in the range of megawatts. Thousandsoff low to medium head
Frances turbines have been installed all over theworld doing a variety
of functions. Mostly they powered generatorsfor farm & industrial
use. However many produced direct mechanicalpower for things like
saw mills, grist mills, ice houses, machine shopsetc. In the late
1800's & early 1900'e on the east coast whentextiles were in their
hay-day, hundreds of textile mills were scatteredalong slow moving but
large rivers. Remnants of these mills can stillbe found today, some
still completely intact. They usually builtcanals to harness the
rivers flow and divert absolutely hugs quantitiesod water into low head
Frances turbines to power these mills. Virtuallyevery piece of equipment
in these mills were powered by one Frances turbine. The turbine would drive
literally hundreds of "jack-shafts" through themill. Each jack-shaft
would in turn supply power to several machines via flat belting.
There are however a few ultra high head scattered throughout mountainregions.
The 1 megawatt Nantahala Power Plant near Bryson City NCis the most famous
of these high head Frances turbine. TheNantahala plants water
supply is miles & miles away. The waterflows through several
miles of tunnel & steel penstock 8 feet in diameter. The operating
head is a whopping 1000 feet! The runner of theNantahala turbine
is very narrow (short) & very wide when comparedto a 100 foot head
Francis at a dam site. The Frances runner picturedabove is typical
of typical proportions for a medium head (100 foot) runners.