|

Following is the genealogy of John Brantley of Nash
County. Recent DNA comparisons by the Brantley Association indicate
that descendants of John Brantley of Nash County are not descended
from Edward Brantley, the first Brantley in
America and
the father of all Brantleys in America. The site was constructed
while we thought that John Brantley of Nash County was a direct
descendant of Edward Brantley. (See note at the bottom of the
page about the lineage.) This site is an attempt to
chronicle John Brantley's descendants that continue to have Nash county
roots. Email Ann to contribute your
Brantley family ancestry.
If you are interested in joining a Brantley family site and
meeting other Brantleys with roots in Nash county, contact
Ann Douglas at Ann @ Brantley. com. The
site is on MyFamily (Nash County Roots).If
your surname is Brantley and you would like to participate in the
Brantley DNA project contact Ann @ Brantley. com.
Note:
Where applicable, specific
sources are given for the material herein.
Following is Edward Brantly's line as close to
John of Nash County as we have been able to determine.
Edward Brantly
b. abt. 1617
m.
d. Jan. 1, 1689
Edward Brantly came to America as an indentured servant under
John Seaward who received a land patent on June 18, 1638 for 400
acres, Isle of Wight county, Virginia for transporting Edward and
7 other individuals to America. (pg. 634 Virginia Land Patents
and Grants [copy
of original]). Edward received a land patent of 675
acres in Isle of Wight county 30 Oct 1669 (pg. 261) for:
"Trans. of 14 persons."
son
of Edward Brantley
son
of Phillip Brantleyb.
abt 1672 Isle of Wight co., VA
m.
d. 1737 Nottoway Parish, Isle of Wight co, VA
James Brantley
b. abt 1700 Isle of Wight county, VA
m. Ruth
d. 1741
b. abt 1730 Isle of Wight county, VA
m. Elizabeth
d. 1785 Nash county
|
b. abt 1732 Halifax county, NC
m. Rebecca
|
|
|
From the Brantley Association web site:
Update 2006
DNA testing shows that John Brantley
of Nash County, is not a descendant of Edward Brantley of 1638
through a consistent male line. That is, he does not
descend from him from father to son, to son, etc as we would
expect. Often grandfathers will adopt the children of a deceased
daughter and rear them with their own name. Since the Y-chromosome
is handed down from father to son ONLY, it would not follow through
the daughter. It is likely that John is a descendant of Edward, but
DNA testing seemingly assures us that he did not descend through the
generations from father to son. Since he was no doubt tied either
by adoption, if not by blood, to the Brantley family, his
descendants are considered of the lineage of Edward. The best news
of this discovery, is that now we can identify his descendants by
the distinct DNA profile as shown in others of his known
descendants. It has already shown that some proposed as his
descendants were, in fact not, and others previously unknown in his
lineage have now been identified as his descendants. There are many
more discoveries that will be made in the coming years as we find
others among his many descendants throughout America through DNA
testing
|
|