The CNBC Debate: The Hishammuddin
Fiasco Hides An
Unspoken Fear
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 20:14:06
+0800 (MYT)
The UMNO youth leader, Dato' Seri
Hishammuddin Hussein, revealed an
unexpected truth when he challenged
the PAS youth leader, Haji Mahfuz
Omar, to a televised debate on CNBC:
the hope that the PAS leader would
reject it. For unbeknowst
to him, the ground and focus of UMNO's
political target changed.
The UMNO reaction was unexpected: the Wanita
chief, Dr Siti Zaharah, was cutting
in her comments about wasting time
on inconsequentials; the euphoric
UMNO support he expected did not go
beyond a feeble statement from the
Prime Minister. It was, in short,
ignored even by UMNO. So,
Hishammuddin's call to Mahfuz to resign for
rejecting it is farcical to say
the least; why did he not when he
refused to turn up at the UKM campus
last month? This episode revealed
an unexpected change of electoral
strategy in UMNO. Suddenly, the
target is not PAS, which it once
believed to be more dangerous than
Keadilan. The months proved
it wrong: Keadilan burrowed into UMNO
strongholds so thoroughly and in
stealth, its public statements often a
diversionary exercise to mask the
reality that UMNO was fooled. UMNO
now scrambles. It now gears
up to address the Keadilan threat. I was
surprised by the UMNO reaction to
Keadilan Wanita chief Nell Onn's
reported threat -- which incidentally
she said she did not make -- to
stand against her nephew, Hishammuddin
Onn. That sent shivers down the
UMNO spine, especially in Johore
and the Tenggaroh parliamentary
constituency.
Keadilan
proves to be a more determined opponent to UMNO than
Semangat '46 ever was. The
DAP and PAS, despite their public affront at
the newcomer into their ranks, think
so too. The difficulties in
getting an opposition front working
has as much to do with this as the
narrowing of party positions that
are rooted in its rhetoric. Keadilan
news has gone off the media, with
UMNO attacks, especially by the Prime
Minister, ignored by the party high
command. UMNO's nervousness is
clear. The PAS's emphasis
on an Islamic code re-emerges with a
vengeance: the Kelantan mentri
besar's promise to appoint only ugly
women into the civil service is
not as silly as it seems on the surface.
If it was silly, UMNO, the National
Front component parties, the women's
organisations and NGOs would have
excoriated him. But none has. He has
framed the debate in Islamic terms
to throw a spanner in the works in
the Malay vote bank. The government's
minister in charge of Islam, IKIM
and other government-sponsored Islamic
bodies kept quiet. Why? Because
they cannot challenge this without
upsetting the government's vote bank.
It is also an attempt to wean the
ground away from Keadilan. The DAP
debate is caught in this so much
that it cannot come to an electoral
pact with PAS without its ground
angry at having "sold out".
In this
confusion, Keadilan remains in the news with its well-aimed
cannons lobbed at UMNO and the National
Front. The jailed deputy prime
minister, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim,
has filed a police report accusing
the Prime Minister, the Attorney
General and the DPP Abdul Gani Patail
of corruption -- the same charge
for which he was jailed for six years.
The government does not react, but
the object of his attack -- Datin
Rafidah Aziz, the minister for international
trade and industry, is
nervous; she says she had
been cleared; but the issue is not whether
she has been cleared or not;
the issue is that the Prime Minister would
not allow the prosecution to proceed
when the Attorney-General Chambers
recommended a clear case of corrupt
practice on the part of the cabinet
minister. Another police report
along the same lines but involving
another cabinet minister is in the
works. Keadilan appears unconcerned
with the havoc caused against them,
but its refusal to react to these
charged attacks begins to have an
impact: the public ignores them. As
one old UMNO hand said to me today:
"If the opposition cannot get its
act together, why then is the Prime
Minister and UMNO attacking them
without relent, not giving them
a chance to respond?"
Even more
worrisome for the National Front and UMNO is that it has
to contain two conflagarations:
the Anwar finger-pointing questions the
public integrity of the Prime Minister
and senior members of his
cabinet; and the other extreme
of defining the political debate in
Islamic terms. Either can
scuttle the political debate. The UMNO
machine still gives it an edge in
the coming elections: the DAP's
belief that its two-thirds majority
is safe appears correct at this
stage, although I am not sanguine
about that now as I was a month ago.
The non-Malay National Front partners
are running for their lives: their
candidates depend on Malay support
to win; with the Malay ground
insecure, they cannot be sure.
The support the opposition would or
would not get from Sabah and Sarawak
could well be crucial to the
National Front retaining its two-thirds
majority. But UMNO cannot be
written off: it knows only
too well that a spell on the opposition
benches could well be its end.
Its life-long loyal friends cannot
either, but they have a choice to
join the winning side. The UMNO
dalang's actions are less sure than
it has been. I am inclined to
believe that if UMNO does not obtain
its two-thirds majority, it could
well lose; and if it does
retain its two-thirds majority, several of
his key figures would have to find
other employment than members of
parliament. But this assessment
excludes the elections in the 13
states.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@mgg.pc.my
|