(This thesis is
Copyright Jim Boyce
1994. However, it is an important document, in the context
of the Men's Movement, and it has proved impossible to locate Jim Boyce
to seek his approval for its publication. He has allowed a summary
of it to be published elsewhere on the Web, and he has sent a hard-copy
of it to Peter Zohrab, who has -- after some years -- scanned it and converted
it into an electronic text document, for the benefit of the contemporary
struggle for Men's Rights, and for the benefit of posterity. The
original formatting, as regards columns, paragraph styles, font sizes,
etc., has been altered in some respects, in the process of editing the
output of the optical character recognition process.)
Table
of Contents
Chapter One: Introduction
- The Five Ws
Who? Adult Male and Female Victims of Violence
What? The Portrayal of Victims in Headlines
When? From 1989 to 1992.
Where? The Newspapers Indexed by The Canadian News Index
Why? To Discover the Scope, Focus, Accuracy and
Consequences of Coverage of Gender and Violence
Chapter Two: Methodology and
Definitions
Creating the Sample of Headlines
Grouping the Headlines
Group One: Literal Headlines
Group Two: Contextual Headlines
Group Three: Connotational Headlines
Group Four: Neutral Headlines
Group Five: Other Headlines
Chapter Three: Quantitative
and Qualitative Results
Quantitative Results
Qualitative Results
The Montreal Murders
Sources
Chapter Four: Specific Aspects
of Headline Coverage
Chronological Trends
Front-Page and Multi-Page Headlines
Headlines From CNI Categories With Gender-Neutral Titles
Headlines From Previous Years
Headlines From the CNI Category Child Abuse
Chapter Five: Explaining the
Results
Rates of Violence Against Men and Women
The Emphasis on Family and Sexual Violence
Coverage of The Montreal Murders
The Use of Sources
Chapter Six: Consequences
of the Findings
The Media and Reality
Background on the Consequences of Media Coverage
Effects on Public Perceptions
Effects on Public Policy
Men, Women and Violence
Quotations
Our
hypothesis is that worthy victims
will be featured prominently and
dramatically, that they will be
humanized, and that their
victimization will receive the
detail and context in story construction that will generate reader interest and sympathetic emotion. In contrast,
unworthy victims will merit only
slight detail, minimal humanization, and
little context that will excite and enrage.
--
Herman and Chomsky,
Manufacturing Consent (1988:35)
Can
we be so far off the
mark about our own social reality?
-- Crowley,
Sex, Lies and Violence Inroads
(1993:132)
There are many people who have helped me with this thesis and to all of
them I extend my thanks. I particularly thank Dr. Peter Erb
and Dr. Harold Remus for their guidance, Catherine
Huggins and Ann Duffy for all of their assistance, and my fellow friends
and students for their support, especially Jane Duffy and Mark Chapman.
Barrie Zwicker deserves special thanks for reading
my early chapters and giving me valuable advice and confidence over many
hours of phone conversations.
I also extend thanks to the members of my thesis committee.
To Dr. Michel Desjardins who became a member
on short notice and whose written remarks were accompanied by insight
and wit. To Dr. lwona
Irwin-Zarecka for her steady support and for
telling me I am on the cutting edge (although we are not sure
whether it be that of a guillotine or academic discourse). And, finally,
to Dr. Leo Groarke who, for an entire year,
has endured the chaos which has surrounded the writing of this thesis.
He has been both an advisor and a friend in this endeavour.
I dedicate this thesis to the memory of my Dad, who would
engage my questioning mind in debate, and to my Mom, who managed to put
up with us.
This thesis examines the portrayal of male and female victims of violence
in the headlines of seven Canadian daily newspapers between 1989 and 1992.
Headlines were gathered from The Canadian Newspaper Index.
Womens and mens victimization was found to receive
different types and amounts of coverage. This coverage is inconsistent
with known rates of violence against women and men, and I suggest three
reasons for the disparities. I conclude by considering the possible consequences
such coverage has for public perceptions and public policy.
|