In many countries distance education is identified with
"correspondence education". Even in those countries which have established
effective distance education modes, there is an assumption on the part of many (especially
university academics) that on-campus education is "real" education whereas
distance education is a second-class system of education.
But a paradigm shift is occurring in higher education as various
countries increase access to it by creating systems of "mass higher education",
and as the world witnesses the globalisation of the economy, communication and education.
Increasingly, the "clients" (students) for higher education require their
"learning service" at a time and place convenient for them rather than at the
convenience of the providing institution.
And the changing nature of knowledge, communication and work
implies that clients will need to learn throughout their working lives rather than in a
short concentrated block at the end of secondary schooling.
The NBEET "Candy Report" (Candy,
Crebert & OLeary, 1994, p. 186) points out that placing the two concepts
"lifelong" and "learning" at the centre of undergraduate programs
So, with "lifelong" and "learning" at the
centre of undergraduate programs, the role of academic and other staff employed by the
university is to serve as facilitators of learning, not deliverers of education.
Distance education, as a typically resource-based form of
education, can fit well within this new paradigm.