CATEGORY Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Respect for Other Team All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language. Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not. Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark. Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful.
Information All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough. Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough. Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough. Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.
Rebuttal All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak. Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
Use of Facts/Statistics Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. Every point was not supported.
Presentation Style Team consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience. Team usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience. Team sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience. One or more members of the team had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience.
Organization All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion. Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion. All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical. Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).
Understanding of Topic The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly. The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease. The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease. The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.

Collaborative Work Skills: Foodquest

Teacher name: Barbara Dieu

Student Name ___________________

CATEGORY Excellent Good Satisfactory

Group does not have to adjust deadlines or work responsibilities because of this person's procrastination.


Monitors Group Effectiveness Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group, and makes suggestions to make it more effective. Routinely monitors the effectiveness of the group and works to make the group more effective. Occassionally monitors the effectiveness of the group and works to make the group more effective. Rarely monitors the effectiveness of the group and does not work to make it more effective.
Working with Others