Foodquest
Rubric: Group Presentation
Debate on Type of Restaurant to be Chosen
CATEGORY |
Needs
Improvement
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Mark
|
Respect for Other Teams | Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful. | Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark. | Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not. | All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language. | |
Information | Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear. | Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough | Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough. |
All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough. | |
Rebuttal | Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant | Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak. | Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. |
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. | |
Use of Facts/Statistics | Every point was not supported. | Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. | Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. | Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. | |
Presentation Style | One or more members of the team had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience. | Team sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience. | Team usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience. | Team consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience. | |
Organization | Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise). | All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical. |
Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion. |
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion. | |
Understanding of Topic | The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic. | The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease. | The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease. | The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly. |
.