Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:18:39 -0700 (MST)
From: snail@aztec.asu.edu (MIKE ROSS)
Subject: they have committed a crime and should be punished - biased??
To: RegistrLBT@aol.com, snail, lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com, mhorning@eskimo.com, barry@empirico.com


at the appeals hearing i remember that either tom rawles or
john buttrick was on the stand answering questions from the
judges and one of them said something like 

     alp has refused to obey elections laws because they
     are unconstional.

i was suprized when one of the judges (i think the female
leader) responded  said something like

    "they (alp) have committed a crime and should be punished"

could that statement mean the judge was biased and had no 
intention of giving alp a fair shot and see if the election
laws were unconstional?

second if that satement did show bias is that statement part 
of records of the court proceeding? or was the only one who 
got a copy of it was powell with his tape recorder? 



since we dont have a lawyer anymore (or a lawyer with lots
of free time) whould it be possible to see if the ACLU would
be interested in the case.

the fact that only libertarians im pima county can elect PCM 
and us folks in maricopa county cant elect any one would seem
to say the laws are biased.

i was talking to the ladys who runs the aclu in arizona 2
weeks ago and she know buttrick. does anybody else have
any inside info

--
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; 
when the government fears the people, there is liberty "
                             Thomas Jefferson