Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 18:40:25 -0400
From: bobhunt@erols.com
Subject: [lpaz-repost] (fwd) CAS: Tactical Nuclear Weapons Deployed
To: Individual-Sovereignty@egroups.com, lpaz-repost@yahoogroups.com, american_Liberty@egroups.com

On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 10:10:55 -0700, DOC <avakoff@pacbell.net> wrote:

>From http://debka.com/

Tactical Nuclear Weapons Deployed 6 October:

DEBKAfile?EURs military and intelligence sources report that Presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin, in a single 70-minuted conversation on September 23, eleven days after the terrorist assaults in New York and Washington, agreed on the deployment of tactical weapons.

This is an epic shift in the global balance of strength.

Putin gave the nod for US forces poised in Central Asia to jump into Afghanistan to be armed with tactical nuclear weapons, such as small neutron bombs, which emit strong radiation, nuclear mines, shells, and other nuclear ammunition suited to commando warfare in mountainous terrain.

In return, Bush assented to Russia deploying tactical nuclear weapons units around Chechnya after Moscow?EURs ultimatum to the rebels, some of whom are backed by Osama Bin Laden, to surrender, went by without response.

DEBKAfile?EUR s military sources place the US nuclear weapons in four former Soviet Central Asian bases: the military air facility at Tuzel, 15 km (10 miles) northwest of the Uzbek capital of Tashkent; at Kagady in the Termez region; in Khandabad, near the city of Karshi; and at the military air base in Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan.

In addition to the nuclear weapons units, Russian bombers carrying small neutron bombs were moved to Russian military air bases around the border of the breakaway province, in Stavropol northwest of Chechnya, the Godowta base in Georgia to the south, and Mozdok in northern Osetia, northwest of Chechnya.

Russian and U.S. military sources refuse to take questions on these startling events.

The US is far from eager to actively inject a nuclear element into the war against terrorism and will not be the first to do so.

According to DEBKAfile?EURs military sources, the US plans to hold those tactical nuclear weapons in reserve, unleashing them in the campaign against bin Laden only in certain extreme circumstances:

1. To counter a move by Bin Laden?EURs men first bring out nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against the US force fighting inside Afghanistan.

2. If a chemical or biological assault by the Taliban against Pakistan.

3. Should groups of bin Laden?EURs Al Qaeda network ?EUR either in Central Asia or the Balkans ?EUR wield these weapons of mass destruction against US military targets or US nuclear arms in other parts of the world.

4. If using them is the only way to save heavy American combat casualties.

-- Warm Regards,

DOC _________________~ ~ (____(*)__________} } }


This mailing list is for discussion of Clinton Administration Scandals. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send electronic mail to majordomo@admin.listbox.com. In the message body put: unsubscribe cas

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> FREE COLLEGE MONEY CLICK HERE to search 600,000 scholarships! http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pv4pGD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/JdSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Community home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/community/lpaz-repost

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Check out Atheists United - Arizona
Visit my atheist friends at Heritics, Atheists, Skeptics, Humanists, Infidels, and Secular Humanists - Arizona
Arizona Secular Humanists
Paul Putz Cooks the Arizona Secular Humanist's Check Book
News about crimes commited by the police and government
News about crimes commited by religious leaders and beleivers
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!
Libertarians talk about freedom