July 1st, 1998 Update

A&E has just started running an ad that says that 
A&E documentaries are as close to the truth as you 
get.  They wish! What they really mean is that A&E 
documentaries are as close to the truth as they'll (let 
you) get (if they can help it!)

In a 1986 archive tape Mae Brussel, conspiracy 
researcher who was assassinated to silence her, said 
that the media often block sources that do not 
conform with the status quo.  She cites reporters in 
1986 who were not allowed to quote or reference Jim 
Garrison (Florida DA who tried to reopen the JFK 
case) as he was not a credible source.  Now he had 
testimony from people who claimed that Warren 
Commission depositions with their alleged signatures 
were in fact fictions that had their names forged and 
completely inconsistent with their testimony.  Ah, 
1986, that was before things really got bad and the 
folks at A&E started telling us they are going to get 
us as close as we'll get to the truth.  They are almost 
as good as MSNBC ranting and raving day after day 
about the Publics Right to Know (about Clinton's 
personal sex life) while muddying, covering up, lying 
and misrepresenting an ocean of information about a 
covert conspiracy that is controlling the United States 
and the media! Indeed, yesterday's missile fired at 
Iraq was yet another step of the global oligarchy 
(using the U.S.  as its private thug) as it sets 
precedence for disregard of national sovereignty that 
will not end until the U.S.  is completely enslaved, the 
Constitution burned along with the Flag, or perhaps 
the entire world destroyed!

Essay prior to 7/1/1998 

I would like to qualify the following essay with the 
fact that I was upset with Investigative Reports 
fraudulent reporting, and the following criticism of 
A&E is directed at the management that would allow 
such fraud and does not necessarily reflect on other 
programming on A&E Television.  Comments on the 
History channel are based on a sampling which 
consistently resulted in the observation of incomplete 
revisionist perspectives in the reporting of history.

With respect to A&E Television I have only bad news 
for you.  If you expect anything more than a criminal 
cover-up in the presentations of A&E Investigative 
Reports, you will be sadly mistaken.  If you believe 
what they say, you are one of the fools who will be 
ripped off by criminals in suits and ties screaming, 
"one tear, I thought that would stop a war but 
someone is, killing me (Rebirth, John Wyndham)".  
"And that's the last hour to think anymore, jelly and 
juice and bubbles, bubbles on the floor (Crown of 
Creation, Jefferson Airplane)".

I conclude A&E failed to investigate the testimony by 
the witness quoted in the related "Murder of Vince 
Foster" page I have created (as a result of my outrage 
after watching A&E's slimeball cover-up of real 
events.  Being nice I can say A&E is fully confused 
and its investigators are only concerned about their 
paychecks, not the truth.  They have regurgitated the 
story as the criminals who murdered Vince Foster 
expect him to.

I tried to email A&E with testimony from a man who 
heard the officers in the LAPD discuss and admit to 
the murder of Ron Brown and Nicole Simpson, and 
who was told by Vince Foster of the death threat to 
Vince Foster the day before he died, but A&E makes 
it very difficult to send them email longer than the 
sound bytes they mistake for fact and truth.  Perhaps 
they wish to waste tree's (i.e.  they expect me to send 
them longer letters on paper only), or are too lazy to 
read, and thus limit the content.  I copied and pasted 
a pertinent document to them, and it was chopped off.  
I broke it into sections smaller than the size that was 
being chopped off, and my email still would fail to 
transmit.  The undisclosed allowable size for an email 
through their submit form is sound byte size.  They 
give an hour story full of misinformation, and 
supposition based on that misinformation, and expect 
sound byte feedback only.  They don't care about the 
truth, they only care about suckering you so they can 
get paid and serving the criminals who have 
committed this heinous deed.  And worse, perhaps 
they are knowingly engaging in the cover-up of the 
murders of American citizens who do investigate and 
expose real crimes, which might explain their 
aversion to doing what they say they do: Investigate!

I wasted over an hour trying to get them material for 
a basis for a real investigation, but they effectively 
blocked it.  They have since responded saying they 
stand by their story (read: cover-up!) and I have 
responded saying that they have been exposed on this 
web page and the web page regarding the murder of 
Vince Foster.

Their other stories and companion channel are just as 
bad.

The History channel is revisionist history, or lies, as 
we used to call them back in the days when right was 
right and wrong was wrong.

I suggest both of these channels should be held liable 
for their irresponsible and criminal cover-up which is 
tantamount to accessory in these crimes.  They know 
as well as I they are involved in a cover-up, and they 
have a responsibility as the media reaching millions 
of people.  When lying to manipulate and cover-up 
major crimes becomes the status quo, that poses a 
much more immediate danger than yelling "fire" in a 
theatre, for the danger they impose spans to cover all 
life on the planet and for times into the future!!!

Rather than including it here, I will include a 
summary of their program on Vince Foster's murder 
and the information they blocked so they would not 
have to deal with really investigating.

Links