Guestbook: Thoughts on Europe's new Politics

Contrary to what the Establishment press is reporting, the Israeli government has benefited greatly by pulling out of war-torn southern Lebanon.
Exclusive to The SPOTLIGHT
By Martin Mann
The dreaded "death ray" laser, the ultimate battlefield weapon developed by the most advanced U.S. defense technology (and first exposed by The SPOTLIGHT on March 8, 1999) will be turned over to Israel this year as part of the reward the Clinton administration is handing the country for ending its long, illegal military occupation of southern Lebanon.
The terrifying laser weapon will permanently blind a soldier, or anyone who gets in its way, in a split second.
Developed by the giant defense contractor TRW at a cost of some $650 million, this highly-classified weapons system has been hidden under a variety of code names over the years, tagged the "Nautilus Project," the "Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser" (MIRACL) and other covers.
Now designated the High Energy Tactical Laser (HETL) and described by well-placed sources as a megawatt-class, continuous wave deuterium fluoride laser, the directed-energy ray reportedly has the extraordinary capability of inflicting permanent blindness on an opposing force at distances over 10 miles.
The system was, however, judged "too inhumane" to be deployed under "civilized rules of warfare" and withheld from U.S. armed forces. But under heavy behind-the scenes pressure from the Israeli lobby, the most powerful special-interest group in Washington, the Clinton administration decided to turn over the HETL laser to Israel as a gift.
Now in the final stages of field tests at the White Sands Proving Grounds in New Mexico, the beam weapon will be installed along Israel's frontier with Lebanon by a task force of U.S. Army engineers in early September, these sources reported.
The official White House explanation for arming the lawless, quarrelsome mini-state with such a terrifying superweapon is that HETL systems can also serve as tactical anti-missile batteries.
"This laser should prove an asset to Israel's front-line defenses because it is also capable of intercepting incoming rounds of so-called 'Katusha' rockets, the kind Hezbollah militants have been firing across the border from their bases in southern Lebanon," Lt. Col. Nancy Burt, a U.S. Army spokesperson, explained laboriously.
But privately, both U.S. and Middle Eastern intelligence sources scoffed at the spokesperson's explanation.
"No sane government, not even the Clinton administration, would spend hundreds of millions of dollars and years of high-tech research just to knock down the few mortar-fired rockets lobbed off now and then by small bands of Muslim militants," said Dr. Rashied Mosten, an arms-control specialist at the Centre des Etudes Transatlantiques (CETRA), the respected international study center.
In addition to installed HETL systems, Israel stands to receive a variety of handouts and concessions for its retreat from Lebanon:
• Despite protests from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the White House will share the latest real-time U.S. satellite intelligence on the Middle East with the Israeli army, in order to provide "early warning" about Arab troop movements anywhere in the region.
• Israel will get "supplemental" military aid now estimated to run anywhere from $50 million to $150 million to help cover the costs of erecting a new defense line on the border with Lebanon.
• Israel has been treated as a pariah ever since it joined the UN because its application for membership was rejected by every regional organization within the world forum. Membership in a regional organization is a key requirement for privileges enjoyed by full UN members, such as the rotating membership of the powerful Security Council. Now, after intense lobbying by Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, the ministate will reportedly be accepted as a provisional member by a regional organization of the UN known as "Western Europe and Others" (WEOG), a motley group of small European and Far Eastern UN member states.
• The so-called "Memorandum of Understanding," the controversial secret protocol that has given Israel access to high-tech U.S. armaments and weapons designs for more than a decade without the obligation to render an accounting to Congress or the public, will be "upgraded" next year.
Israel has "sacrificed" its occupied zone in Lebanon without "getting anything in return," lamented columnist Charles Krauthammer, an unquestioning Zionist apologist.
But in reality, "Israel has once again managed to turn a so-called 'sacrifice' into a very profitable deal, in which American taxpayers will make the real sacrifices," commented Mosten.

aus aktuellem Anlass

THE FINANCIAL TIMES, 4.2.: "Meanwhile it emerged in Brussels that President Klestil had played a significant part in the genesis of Monday's declaration of sanctions. Diplomats reported he had made 'a very strong approach' to individual leaders for such action."
THE GUARDIAN; 4.2.: "Britain broke its silence with comments from Robin Cook, the foreign secretary, who advocated a wait-and-see approach to decide how long the Austrian government would remain in quarantine. ... He defended a 'carefully measured signal' by the 14. ... Tony Blair is understood to have agreed to the move after a personal appeal from Thomas Klestil, the Austrian President, though the foreign office was concerned about the effect on the workings of the union."
THE TIMES, 4.2.: "At the start of the week ... President Klestil telephoned heads of government to say that their intervention was the only way of preventing the Freedom Party's inclusion. Some governments had serious reservations about such a blatant intervention and feared the statement might actually boost Herr Haider [!], but they felt unable to reject such an urgent appeal from Austria's own President."

Beenden wir das Theater! Wenn's nicht stimmt, wird Klestil die berichtenden Blaetter ja wohl klagen koennen. UHBP kann fuer sich beschliessen, mit solchen Anschuldigungen leben zu wollen, der oest. Bevoelkerung aber ist das schlicht nicht zumutbar. Haider das Thema auf kleiner Flamme jahrelang weiterkochen zu lassen, ist keine Loesung.
===========
Comment John: If this is true, I would call it TREASON !
Any comments?

Voice of Freedom newspaper
The latest issue of Freedom is now going to press - a few days late on the account of the elections.
The front cover this month deals with William Hague playing the race card and the sacrifice of British manufacturing jobs on the altar of globalism.
April's edition of Freedom is now fully online in pdf format.
http://www.bnp.to/bn.htm

A MESSAGE FROM BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CHAIRMAN,
NICK GRIFFIN

HUGE BNP ADVANCE IN THE LONDON ELECTIONS!

Dear e-supporter

The results of the London Mayoral and Assembly elections represent a very significant hidden advance for the British National Party. 'Hidden' because various supposedly quality newspapers, including the Telegraph and Independent, have gone to extraordinary lengths to keep their readers in the dark as to just how well we did. Even those media outlets which have reported the bare overall London results have been careful to avoid drawing attention to the details which show how much progress we're now making. So as the media won't report the truth, here it is:

In the party list election for the Assembly, the BNP gained 47,670 votes. This was 2.87% of the vote, which means that we quite comfortably topped the 2.5% figure needed to retain our £5,000 deposit. There's a headline they could have run, but didn't.

In the Mayoral election, BNP candidate Mike Newland took 33,569 first preference votes, and a further 45,337 second preference votes from other electors. This means that, despite all the media demonisation in the past, and a London-wide virtual media blackout during the campaign, a total of 78,906 people voted for a British National Party mayor! 4.6% of Londoners who went to the polls voted BNP! According to the Government-backed Operation Black Vote publicity material, ethnic minorities now form "one-third and rising" of the London electorate, so while we know that a few non-whites supported us, our support among specifically white voters must have been even higher - perhaps 6% of white Londoners voted BNP! There's a headline they could have run, but didn't.

Ken Livingstone received a total of 846,686 first and second preference votes. This means that our Mike Newland received nearly 10% of the vote that has put 'Red' Ken in charge of our capital. That's an awful lot of Londoners that Livingstone declared war on as 'racists' in his first post-election speech! There's a story they could have run, but didn't.

Despite the fact that the BBC gave the UK Independence Party a TV broadcast, while denying one to the BNP, we beat UKIP in every London constituency in the Mayoral race, and in 12 out of the 14 London constituencies in the party list contest. Incidentally, also quite easily. Overall, our 2.87% compares very well with the collapsed UKIP vote of 2.0%. There's a headline they could have run, but didn't.

In last June's European elections, the BNP motivated just under 18,000 Londoners to go out and vote BNP. This time, with a more professional campaign machine, 78,906 Londoners backed us. This fourfold increase in our vote in just eleven months is a headline they could have run, but didn't.

The BNP vote was even more significant in our heartland areas in East London. In the entire City & East seat - which comprises the boroughs of the City, Tower Hamlets, Newham, and Barking & Dagenham - our party vote reached 7.1%. By comparison, back in the 1997 general election, we took more than 5% in just two of the seven seats in the area. Another area to see a big increase in the BNP vote was Redbridge & Havering, where we took 4.4% of the party list votes. This huge and widespread broadening of BNP support is a headline they could have run, but didn't.

And when we look at the detail of our mayoral vote in City & East, the facts are even more worthy of note. Mike Newland took 9,920 first and second preference votes in this constituency, in which a total of 114,022 electors voted for a mayoral candidate. This means that 8.7% of valid votes in East London were for a BNP mayor. When we take into account the fact that about one-third of the population are from ethnic 'minorities', it emerges that towards 12% of white East Enders backed the British National Party! This evidence of rapidly growing rejection of multiracial orthodoxy is a headline they could have run, but didn't.

The media silence which has surrounded the BNP, both during and immediately after the campaign, is the most eloquent testimony to the chronic nervousness of the liberal 'elite' these days. Quite simply, they're scared of our potential now. They know that an ever-growing number of ordinary people have had enough of their failed multiracial experiment. The liberals know that, in the British National Party, they now face an experienced, careful and determined opponent. And while William Hague's recent outbursts on asylum seekers have undoubtedly reassured some elderly Middle Englanders that there's still a place for them in the Tory party, it is clear that his comments have helped greatly to legitimise what is spuriously termed 'racism' in the eyes of large numbers of working class ex-Labourites who still wouldn't dream of voting Conservative, but who are increasingly ready to back us.

To add to the liberals' woes, London is now in the hands of a group of neo-Marxist, anti-white fanatics. Within hours of being elected, Livingstone appointed as his key advisor Kumar Murshid - a crank who claims that Prince Philip is an "unreconstructed racist" and who calls for abolition of the Monarchy. And guess who's in charge of race affairs and Livingstone's brow-beating of the Metropolitan Police? None other than race agitator Lee Jasper, who has a conviction for assaulting the police. These people will take every opportunity to put down white Londoners, and the liberals know that this will inevitably produce a backlash.

They look at us and shudder as they think of what has already happened in Austria, Switzerland, Italy, France, Belgium and Denmark. Here in Britain they thought that they had clear blue skies for their version of the genocidal multiracial, globalist project, but now they see in the distance a cloud. Although it is at present no bigger than a man's hand, they worry that it could yet become the storm cloud that will wash them down the drain of history. And, you know, they're right!

The only question is how long it will be before the storm breaks. And that, my friends, is largely up to you. Each and every one of you, because we can do so much more with your active support, your donations, and your decision to stand up and join us in our New Battle for Britain.

Yours sincerely

Nick Griffin MA (Hons) Cantab.
Chairman, British National Party

Mayor of London Election

I have noticed this too.
This is, at least for the time being, out of my control.Gruss -- John