by Evgenij Barsoukov
Contents:
3-electrode AC/DC lifter proposal
Any theory is good only if it allows to improve some technolgoy.
Equation F=i*d/k suggests, that it is desirable to maximaze amount
of available charge (and corespondingly current)
without increasing d or V.
For this we need to de-couple charge generation from ion-aceleration.
This could b
be achieved by simple 3-electrode AC-DC lifter design. Instead
of
corona wire we use two winded together wires, one of which is
insulated with sufficiently thick teflon insulation (lets call
it "base"). We apply between this 2 electrodes AC voltage sufficient
to produce sustained barrier discharge. Because of very small
distance between electrodes required AC voltage would be quite small,
say 5 kV. It can be further reduced by coating the insulation with
ferroelectric material pelets but for preliminary test it is not
necessary.
Now, as we already have our plasma, we only need to "suck" out of it
ions of one polarity. For this we place with distance d (much larger
than usual, say 100 mm, a collector and apply DC voltage between
it and not-insulated wire, "emmiter" (which should be +). This way
we
should achieve noticeable current betwen emmiter and collector at
quite large distances d but reasonably small DC and AC voltages
applied and those get much higher F=i*d/k at lower power. Is this a
way to radically improve thrust/power ratio and escape from the
need of magic lifter electrode confuguration and very high voltages
needed for initiation of corona? Some cool experimentator is required
to answer this question...
3-electrode impulse ionization lifter
Using AC/DC 3-electrode arrangement
holds promice to achieve high current
between corona wire and collector
at large distances d between them
(low current is the bigest problem
in creation highly efficient yet compact high-d lifters).
Rememnber, that force/power
ratio ef=d/(k*V) is directly proportional to distance
between wire and collector d.
But due to low current at high d lifter using this property
requires very long wire/colllector
to achive significunt force (F=i*d/k).
First trials of 3 electrode AC/DC
lifter by Saviour indicated that
there is an exceesive ozone
formation when barrier discharge is involved.
This could be solved by decreasing
distance between two AC-electrodes to
reduce plasma volume. However,
anohter method could be - to generate usual
small-volume corona using
second collector (C0) with very small
distance d0 (say 10 mm) to corona
wire W for preliminary ionization.
But then all ions buit on the
wire would be "consumed" by this second
collector C0 (as it is much
nearer then the usual one). To prevent that, we
should switch OFF voltage between
W and C0 before (!) ions will reach C0.
This means, Impulse voltage
E(C0) would be applied between C) and corona wire, while
continuous voltage E(C) would
be applied between corona and usual
collector C (at large d, say
90 cm) to "pick up" all generated ions.
Here is the schematic of impulse
waveform which should be applied between
collector0 and corona wire:
What would happen:
1) Short impulse of voltage E(C0)
is applied at short distance d0,
high corona current starts between
C0 and W due to small distance
between them and correspondingly
high fild intensity near corona
wire. Impulse duration should
be short, so +ions originated from wire
can not reach the C0 during
this time.
"Ionizing impulse" duration
such as to provide that ions do not
reach C0 yet could be easily
calculated from ion velocity equation v=
k*E/d0 which gives flight time
dt = d0^2 / k*E(C0).
1a) Note that due to short impulse
duration no arching can happen, so
d0 can be less then usual 30
mm.
2) When impulse has ended, we
have lots of positive ions in the air
between W anc C0. Because there
is no more negative charge at C0, the
only way for ions is to move
to C.
3) Ions move to C, producing
large thrust in correspondence with
F=i*d/k
4) Next ionizing impulse is applied
after all ions have reached C
which will happen after dt2=
d^2/k*E(C1).
What we have achieved - we practically
would have corona-current
defined by distance d0, while
the thrust would be defined by d.
Time average current would still
be less then that if E(C0) would be
applied continuously, but hopefuly
higher then pure E(C) current.
This could solve two problems
1) increase thrust at large d
(without sacrificing the good
efficiency which is proportional
to d ef=d/(k*E(C))), so we reduce
the necessary size of the whole
electrode array.
2) Reducting minimal allowed
wire/wire distance. Due to small
distance between actual ion-producing
electrodes W and C0 we can
reduce requirement to wire/wire
spacing.
Right now we are confined to
10 cm (optimistically, and tested
only for d=30mm) between corona
wires due to field interraction
between them which increase
corona onset voltage. But if primary
ionizing impulse collector C0
is as near to corona wire as another
corona wire, we would have negligible
interferance from that second
corona wire. This could allow
much more compact ionic propulsion
device.
|