|End of Page||The American System in Russia, China and Japan||Site Map||Overview Page|
Harcave's introduction provides a helpful thumbnail sketch of Witte's life and career. He documents that Count Witte wrote three works, two of them draft memoirs, which have been edited and translated into seven languages. Another, which Harcave excerpts briefly in the Memoirs, was The Origins of the Russo-Japanese War, in which Witte documented his efforts at war-avoidance, beginning with the trans-Siberian railroad. Harcave points out that much of the material in the Memoirs assumes the reader has access to the former work, which included a full volume of documents.
I feel obliged to speak of the response to my proposal that with the construction of the Siberian Railroad there should come greater migration from European to Asiatic Russia.... Such a movement would help thin out the population of European Russia and thus make it easier to improve the peasant lot there and, in the long run, help the railroad pay for itself by developing Siberia.
Yet the idea, far from receiving support, met with hidden opposition, of a kind appropriate to the mentality of the days of serfdom, of the Middle Ages. Many of our influential landowners and their supporters among the Petersburg bureaucracy, particularly Ministry of Interior Ivan Nikolaevich Durnovo, considered my idea harmful.... They, of course, preferred a dense peasant population that would be forced to pay high prices for land or accept low agricultural wages, under the goad of hunger....
As indicated earlier, under Emperor Alexander III we began a shift from private to governmental construction and operation of the railroads, a shift that was to be completed in the reign of Emperor Nicholas II. The new policy was and is based on the belief that railroads have a major importance for the state and that private enterprise, which is basically concerned with private interests, cannot adequately serve the interests of the state in this field. Consequently, both as minister of ways and communications and as minister of finance, I carried out a policy of buying up privately owned railroads as well as promoting construction and operation of new railroads by the government....
After working with railroads for 40 years, it is my conviction that all strategic considerations concerning the routing of railroads are chimerical, that the state will benefit far more if it is guided exclusively by economic considerations in such matters. How we have wasted money is shown by the fact that for 30 years we built railroads for use in a war in the West, but in the end we had to fight in the Far East.
During my tenure as finance minister, industry grew so rapidly that it could be said that a Russian national industrial system had been established. This was made possible by the system of protectionism and by attracting foreign capital.
I was criticized by some blockheads for building up industry too rapidly. Also, I was criticized for using ``artificial means'' in promoting industry. What does this phrase mean? By what means other than artificial can industry develop? Everything that man does, is, to a certain degree, artificial. Only barbarians manage to live without artificial means. Industry has always been developed by artificial means, and the artificial measures I employed were far weaker than those employed for the same ends by other states. This, of course, our salon ignoramuses do not know.
Our landed nobility attacked the protective tariff of 1890, but that tariff helped us build our industry, as did the influx of foreign capital. Unfortunately, in addition to the hindrances I encountered in attracting foreign capital, I encountered opposition in the Committee of Ministers ... to my efforts to improve legislation regarding the establishment of corporations.
Generally speaking, the importance of industry is not appreciated or understood. Only a few men, like Mendeleyev--that great scientist and scholar and my devoted associate and friend--understood its importance and tried to enlighten the Russian public about it. I hope that his book on the subject will be of use to Russian society....
It should be noted that the growth of railroads and industry under my direction took some 4 to 5 million working adults (a total of 20-25 million persons, if one includes their families) off the land. This meant, in effect, an increase in the amount of available land by 54-67 million acres. Of course this meant only a slight increase in labor productivity. To raise productivity significantly we must see to it that the people, particularly the peasantry, have both the incentive and the opportunity to work more productively.
It turned out that I was the only one ... who objected, and very strongly, sharply, and decisively, to the proposed venture. I pointed out that this undertaking would lead in the direction of a European war that would undermine the excellent political and financial situation in which Emperor Alexander III had placed the Russian Empire.
Imagine, Your Majesty, the European countries united in one entity, one that does not waste vast sums of money, resources, blood, and labor on rivalry among themselves, no longer compelled to maintain armies for wars among themselves, no longer forming an armed camp, as is the case now, with each fearing its neighbor. If that were done, Europe would be much richer, much stronger, more civilized, not going downhill under the weight of mutual hatred, rivalry, and war.
The first step toward attaining this goal would be the formation of an alliance of Russia, Germany, and France. Once this were done, the other countries of the European continent would join the alliance. As a consequence, Europe would be freed of the burdens created by existing rivalries: Europe would be mighty, would be able to maintain a dominant position for a long time. But, if the European countries continue on their present course, they will be risking great misfortune.
|Top of Page||The American System in Russia, China and Japan||Site Map||Overview Page|
The Civil War and the American System -- $25.00.
EIR issue January 3, 1992: 200 Years Since Hamilton's 'Report on Manufactures' -- 88 pp, $10.00