RENT'S DUE
The Globe and Mail, Saturday, December 6th, 1998
by Michael Posner

Warren Grill has seen Cats and Les Mis. Warren Grill is homeless. Warren Grill has traveled through Europe, South America, the Caribbean. He sleeps outdoors, in an alleyway, under five blankets. Warren Grill has a degree in horticulture from Guelph University. Today, he ate a donut and two eggs, and drank two cups of coffee.

Once, he had $20,000 in the bank. Tonight, Grill, 39 years old, stands on Toronto's King Street West, with a throwaway cup containing .35 cents and a hand-drawn cardboard sign that reads "Homeless Please help if you can. God bless." Under the beckoning neon of expensive restaurants and theatres named for princesses, the patrons come and go. The temperature is sub-zero. The wind is wicked. His eyes run.

The stark polarities of modern civilization, of which Warren Grill's unhappy life might be illustrative, will be vividly expressed tomorrow evening at the Royal Alexandra Theatre with the long-awaited Canadian premiere of Jonathan Larson's Rent, the most celebrated musical of the decade.

Now 20 months into its still-sold-out run on Broadway, the show depicts a world not typically associated with the Great White Way: the contemporary demimonde of hungry, AIDS-plagued, drug-addicted, rent-starved denizens of New York's East Village. There's even a chorus that Grill would recognize instantly - freezing homeless people, singing ironic parodies of Christmas songs, "How time flies/When compassion dies. . . No candy canes/No loose change. . . 'Cause Santa Claus ain';t coming/No room at the Holiday Inn."

Liberally adapted from La Boheme, Giacomo Puccini's 1896 opera, Rent's story line traces love and death among a bohemian commune of straight, gay, bisexual, and cross-dressed filmmakers, musicians, dancers and artistes. Larson, once asked to condense his work into a single sentence, said simply that it was about "a community celebrating life, in the face of death and AIDS, at the turn of the century."

In Puccini's days, the stage allowed boys to meet girls. In Rent, boys meet girls, girls meet girls, boys meet boys dressed as girls. They fall in love, struggle, quarrel, reconcile - fused by a carpe diem anthem of hope, delivered with urgent rock rhythms and gospel intensity.

"There's only now. There's only here," they sing. "No other road. No other way. No day but today."

So here is gritty bohemia served up to polished Bay Street. Here's a show that savages mainstream values, performed largely for audiences that hold them transcendent. A musical about people rich chiefly in idealism, delivered to people rich principally in property. A brilliant commercial vehicle that has spawned a Bloomingdale's boutique, generated multi-million-dollar record and film deals, and made millions more for its producers, directors and casts, all by appropriating - some might even say exploiting - the anti-capitalist ethic of the street. Profit margins on Rent, in face, are better than those for Broadway megamusicals, because while ticket prices are comparable, its production costs - with its minimalist, low-tech sets and low-budget talent - are dramatically lower.

"There's a tension there," conceded Michael Greif, who has directed every production of the show. "And tension can be interesting. I reconcile it by being pleased that the greatest number of people are able to see it, whoever they are, including some who do not have a lot of money." (As in New York, two front rows of orchestra seats are being made available daily for $20 apiece.)

The cast, too, is accurately aware of Rent's implicit contradictions. "I have a hard time with it, " said Jenifer Aubry, a 25-year-old Quebec singer and actress. "Maybe these people who are paying $80 a ticket will have their eyes opened a little."

If the actors are doing their jobs, maintains Chad Richardson, who plays Mark, the show's narrator, "we're going to educate these people in a way they've never been educated before."

Indeed, you could argue that if the Royal Alexandra's cashmere demographic is out-of-sync with life in the "cold Bohemian hell" portrayed on stage, it is precisely such audiences that are most in need of having their consciousness updated - and their consciences pricked. As Richardson noted, "If it were homeless people coming to see Rent every night, I don't think it would be serving the right purpose." The humanitarian message has had an effect on the cast, at least. "I've always paid the squeegee men," said Karen LeBlanc (Joanne), "But being in the show has made me stop and appreciate things even more. We're not taking our pay cheques and shoving them down to the bottom of our pockets."

After a preview performance last week, the troupe repaired to McDonald's for a late-night snack. Outside, there were kids on the street, freezing. One of the actors instinctively took off her gloves and gave them away.

The Mirvish organization has also responded to the show' subtext, staging previews as fund-raising event for various charities. But when the Mirvishes proposed slashing ticket prices to $15 at one dress rehearsal performance to raise funds for sick children, the New York producers demurred. They also nixed the Canadian Foundation for AIDS Research's sale of red ribbons to Royal Alex patrons, arguing, foundation officials said, that audiences buying charity tickets for previews had already paid a premium for their seats.

But you can say this for Rent: however commercial it has become, it did not start out that way. It started in a tiny, 150-seat theatre in the East Village, playing to its own kind. "It wasn't built to please everyone or make money," said Michael Greif, "but to do justice to the people it was written about - homeless people, and especially the struggling, immature young people in the play. To depict them as human." By now, the origins of Rent are the stuff of show-biz legend. The legend of composer and librettist Larson: suburban, White Plains theatrical prodigy transplanted to squalid SoHo flat, struggling to marry rock music to Broadway, working as a waiter, watching friends die of AIDS. Of the long years of rejection, including one damned-with-faint-praise, put-down by his Broadway idol, Stephen Sondheim. Of the score's welcome reception in 1992 at the non-profit New York Theatre Workshop, followed by two more year of collaborative re-tooling. Of how Larson, on the night of the show's final dress rehearsal at NYTW, had gone home, boiled water for tea, and died - just 35 years old - of an aortic aneurysm that had been misdiagnosed by two sets of emergency room physicians. And of the phenomenon that Rent instantly became, vaulting to Broadway in April, 1996, then touring shows, and soon, Hollywood (in a film version to be directed, if is rumoured, by Martin Scorsese.)

In the United States, the show has won virtually every available citation (Pulitzer Prize, Tony, Drama Desk, Obie, Outer Critics Circle). It has been lauded by critics tripping over superlatives ("the most exuberant and original musical this decade" - Time magazine; "Brilliant" - Newsweek; "As close to op culture as opera gets" - New York Times). And it has been long and lustily cheered by sold-out houses on Broadway, where it is still playing, and in Boston, Chicago, and La Jolla, Calif. Thousands of people, it is said, have seen it several times.

What makes it work? Ultimately, the emotional tug of words and music, as delivered by actors intimately, personally, in tune with the material. As to the American productions, the Mirvishes (50-50 partners with the original New York producers) have opted largely for fresh-faced, multi-racial talent - strong vocally, but without much background to professional musical theatre. It's what director Greif calls "the real factor."

The Toronto cast includes several blacks, one Puerto Rican, one actor who is half-Italian, half-Colombian and one who is half-Israeli, half-Ojibway. The upside potential for this tactic is enormous, an opportunity to mold a company of no-names into an organic unit, armed with the uncorrupted idealism of the young, free of the ego and bad habits of some more established performer. Although the formula has been proven to work, a downside remains - one or more actors may not cut it. "That is the risk," Greif allowed. "Can you get someone there, to the place that the project demands? But Rent was born out of taking risks. Jonathan's whole life was about taking risks on the stage, and I want to take risks in my work as well."

And here's another risk - that performers unaccustomed to the demands of eight shows a week may not have the necessary endurance. Chad Richardson, for example, fell ill this week and missed a few previews. For many cast members, the acting was a long stretch. Not until the end of the third week of rehearsals, recalled Richardson, did he "start to open up and act. Until then, I was frozen, intimidated, screwing up every line. I'd go home a mess, because I simply didn't think I could do it."

Karen LeBlanc also wrestled demons of self-doubt. "I thought, What am I doing here? Am I going to be able to pull this off?" It wasn't until technical rehearsals that it started to come together for me." Still, none of these folks are exactly amateurs. Luther Creek (Roger) blessed with extraordinary vocal equipment, appeared in Rent's national touring company. Krysten Cummings (Mimi) has starred in dozens of professional productions in Europe and America. Richardson, a native of Newfoundland, has just released he second album of pop songs. Karen LeBlanc has staged her show of Tina Turner impersonations around the world.

But most of the cast is also familiar with want - physical, emotional, economic. Danny Blanco (Collins) lost the fingers of his left hand to a sheet-metal press at the age of 17 and has struggled financially. Jai Rodriguez (the cross-dressing Angel), at 18 the youngest Rent performer, hasn't seen his father since hid third birthday party. Rodriguez, one of the original so-called Rentheads who lined up five times for $20 seats and snuck in to the second act dozen times, also lost an aunt, uncle and cousin to AIDS. Richardson, who has a degree from a Paris cooking school, financed his CDs with savings, a back loan and borrowing from his father. Aubry, who for two years starred in Chambres En Villes, a prime-time soap opera in Quebec, was working as a waitress when she auditioned for the part. LeBlanc, a self-described teenage rebel, fended largely for herself from the time she was 12.

Of course, Rent is not the first musical to successfully mine counter-cultural ores, light year removed from Oklahoma, Brigadoon and other more conventional properties. The landmark Hair (1968), for example, spoke eloquently about sex and drugs and grooviness to a generation of sixties rebels. A Chorus Line (1976) chronicled the backstage lives of wannabe hoofers auditioning for a Broadway show. Elizabeth Swados's lesser-known Runaways (1978) even focused on trouble adolescents on the lam. And long before then, Leonard Bernstein's West Side Story (1957) had adapted the Romeo and Juliet saga to the tribal clash of New York's street gangs.

But Rent's themes are at a more topical and more complete level. Its rapid-fire libretto offers a smorgasbord of contemporary cultural references - anorexia, Prozac, Maya Angelou, smack, T-cell counts, Captain Crunch, tent cities, Doc Martens, Absolut vodka, AZT, curry vindalou. One day, of course, these will be remote as references to [something].

But not to worry. That and other musicals have demonstrated the commercial power of nostalgia.

But for now, Rent doesn't have to reply on nostalgia - it is the hottest of hot properties. In New York, theatrical titans waged a mighty battle for the Broadway rights, ultimately won by the Nederlanders, eminent New York producers. In Toronto, both the Mirvish organization and its arch rival, Garth Drabinsky's Livent Inc., wanted the show, badly. Mirvish had planned to stage it last October at the Elgin Theatre. Dranbinsky's people booked the venue and indicated that they had the rights tied up. But David Mirvish, meanwhile, had dinner in New York with Rent producers Jeffery Seller and Kevin McCollum, with whom he had previously worked, and was given an hour to decide whether he wanted the show. He didn't need the hour.

With their own Royal Alex theatre committed to other productions, the Mirvishes approached the Elgin and challenged Livent's option, putting down $1 million. The Elgin, notifying Livent of the challenge, and asking a firm commitment that Drabinsky's organization had secured the rights to Rent. Livent then acknowledge that it did not have the show, but claimed that its oral agreement with the Elgin's management was for either Rent or a re-staging of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat.

Messiness ensued. The Elgin agreement took the view that the theatre had been reserved exclusively for Rent, whoever had the rights had the venue. Drabinsky begged to differ. Well, not beg exactly. Claiming parable harm, he sued the Elgin for $21 million, then sought and won interim emergency court injunction barring use to the theatre until matter was resolved. The Elgin's appeal failed.

Unable to wait, the Mirvishes pulled the show, but the conflict delayed Rent's arrival in Toronto by a year. The Elgin subsequently counter-sued Livent for $9 million siting intentional interference with the theatre's business relations. Both suits are now dormant.

The Elgin-Livent dispute isn't Rent's only legal entanglement. The Larson family has filed suit against the two New York City hospitals who incorrectly diagnosed their son's chest pains as influenza and food poisoning. And dramaturg Lynn Thompson, who claims that between a third and a half of the show's final script is her work, is appealing a recent District Court ruling that Rent is not a joint endeavor and that, therefor, she is not entitled to royalties. Thompson received $2,000 (US) for her work; the Larson estate is now estimated to be worth about $250 million.

Larson chose the musical's title deliberately, playing off the double meaning of the word. Ironically, the lives of many of those associated with the show have indeed been tossed asunder.

Warren Grill steps back out in King Street's cold canyon. He stands silently beside a parking meter, trying to make eye contact with pedestrians. He is grateful to Ed Mirvish, who owns several neighbourhood restaurants, for allowing him to occupy his square foot of pavement - free, as if were, or rent. "I've actually seen Ed three times," Grill said cheerfully, "He's given me loose change every time." Would he like to see Rent? "I'd love to. But what I'd really like is a job."