THE UNIVERSITY TEACHERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, JAFFNA, SRI LANKA
(UTHR(Jaffna))
Briefing No.2
Date of release : 20th June 1995
Children
in the North-East War:1985 -1995
The Beginnings
From the inception of the UTHR(J), we have constantly
documented
the use of children in violence, pointing out areas of
concern. Our
reports analysed the degeneration of the politics that
lay behind this
development. A host of studies in war zones around the
world, including
Jaffna, testify to traumatisation and other extreme adverse
effects on
children resulting from the ravages of war. This makes
children even more
vulnerable to propaganda, the content of which they are,
even under
normal conditions, in no position to judge. The use of
children as tools
of war, where they are manipulated and coerced into being
the unwitting
and unwilling perpetrators of war's inevitable atrocities
and
inhumanities, is therefore as pernicious as it is cynical.
It can form
no part of a genuine liberation struggle. It would thus
hardly come as
a surprise that the child recruits are drawn from the
most vulnerable
sections of society. These child victims in turn brutalise
an entire
society beyond human endurance.
The first use of children in the North-East war
surfaced during the mid-
eighties when various groups used them as sentries. These
children were,
sometimes, given grenades and asked to monitor the
movements of the Sri
Lankan Army as well as of other groups around their
camps. When the
LTTE attacked and killed several hundred cadres from the
TELO in May
1986, several of these children who were on sentry
duty were also
brutally killed. The enlistment of very young children
for military
activities began about November 1987, following the establishment
of the
Indian Army's control over Jaffna. Children as young as
ten were used as
assassins by the LTTE in a bid to paralyse life in Jaffna.
During the
middle of 1989, the Indian-backed EPRLF-led coalition
press-ganged
thousands of youth for its Tamil National Army, hundreds
of whom were
later massacred by the LTTE. Among the conscripts were
many children.
Institutionalisation of child recruitment
A point had been reached where large numbers of people
became
disillusioned with the liberation struggle. While mature
youths kept
away, the use of women and children as combatants became
significant from
the inception of the war with the IPKF(Indian Army). When
the Indian Army
withdrew and the LTTE prepared for a fresh round of war
with the Sri
Lankan forces during the early months of 1990, the use
of children had
become firmly institutionalised.
The LTTE had cornered itself into a situation where its
oppressiveness
within the community had to be counterbalanced by an appeal
deriving from
a vision of the grandiose. Sycophancy from all levels
of society was used
to legitimise its cause and its recruitment drive. We
have in our earlier
reports described how several members of the elite traded
expressions of
support for the LTTE in return for special favours in
securing their
private interests.
From 1990, the LTTE's methods of enlisting children
were initially
relatively subtle. The methods employed included displaying
cut outs and
poster pictures of dead cadre all over, patriotic songs,
exhibits of
representations of Sri Lankan Army atrocities, meetings
in schools, LTTE
versions of history in school curricula with compulsory
tests and a
general exhibition of military glamour. Even children's
playgrounds and
parks were designed with mock weapons to give children
a feeling that
they were playing in a battle ground.A common picture
seen everywhere in
Jaffna in 1990 was of an LTTE soldier holding children
on either side
and walking towards a hill top where a gun was planted
upside down. This
symbolically portrayed the vision of the LTTE.
An important reason why children were vulnerable to the
appeal of the
LTTE was the inhuman behavior of the security forces,
particularly in the
East, and the constant use of aerial bombing and shelling
of civilian
areas of the North. It must be remembered that this recruitment
was
taking place amidst social paralysis, and in a moral
vacuum where only
one voice could be heard - the voice of the LTTE.
Since a momentary perception of glamour, or alienation
, rather than
political motivation, was what led children to join, this
tended to wear
off quickly and many children longed to get back to their
mothers. Thus,
from the beginning, means were contrived by the organisation
to trap the
children.
1. The LTTE's laborious pass system restricts flow of
the people from the
North. Also, the general travel ban on the age group 10-25
years makes
it extremely difficult to take children out of Jaffna.
2.As soon as children were taken into the organisation
their hair was
cropped to make sure that they do not escape. There are
several cases of
deserters in Jaffna who had to be kept hidden until the
hair grew. As the
war of June 1990 gathered momentum even harsher methods
were employed.
Children who joined were quickly hidden away and parents
were denied
contact.The first child to express a wish to go home,
was humiliated and
given a sound thrashing in front of his mates, which effectively
deterred
others from expressing any such wish.
3.The procedure for leaving the organisation was so punitive
that even
those who applied to leave after being in the organisation
for a number
of years often withdrew their application.
Dehumanisation and traumatisation
Many children were used in tasks such as the torture
of political
prisoners, and in massacres, even of women and children
in Muslim and
Sinhalese villages. Children were also used in massed
frontal attacks
such as on Elephant Pass camp in July 1991. There were
also very young
cadre in other major massed attacks, such as at Pooneryn
during November
1993. Each one of these attacks claimed of the order of
500 dead. The
trauma of children who suffered permanent loss of
limb and saw many of
their closest comrades mowed down, made a vivid impression
on those who
visited Jaffna Hospital.The agony of children who had
being used in acts
of violence against unarmed civilians, women and children
are also on
record. Several of them were in the 12-14 age group. Many
of them live in
a spiritual emptiness where they wish to end their lives,
and resign
themselves to be used within the organisation itself as
suicide
operatives. The LTTE also found that children are
more useful and
efficient as lone assassins. With cyanide in hand, when
children lose the
fear of being apprehended, they could become very deadly.
They have fewer
inhibitions and treat the assignments as a game.
Target groups
One gets some idea of which the target groups for recruitment
are if one
takes into account the fact that in the Jaffna peninsula,
the most
educationally advanced part of the North-East where
many have access to
foreign countries, about 20 to 30% of the population has
already
emigrated to the West. Although the LTTE regards all children
as
potential recruits and has imposed strict controls on
people leaving the
North, the elite and their children are accorded favoured
treatment in
return for their complicity. Displacement of large populations
and the
high cost of living, partly resulting from the LTTE's
means of financing
the war, have made the poor extremely desperate. It is
such groups that
provide most of the child recruits.`Punniapoomi' (Sacred
Land) is a
school run by the LTTE in Oddusuddan where children are
moulded and
trained in a militaristic environment. The 'Chencholai'
group are LTTE
sponsored orphanages in Jaffna, where children are taught
to sing songs
with godly veneration for the Leader and his vision.
From early March 1995 even as the recent peace talks were
supposed to be
going on, LTTE propaganda wing leader Thamil Chelvan addressed
school
children in the Rural North announcing preparations for
the next round
of war and calling for volunteers. Recruitment took an
aggressive turn,
particularly when the war became a physical fact from
19th April. There
was a sharp increase in the invasion of schools and tutories
in Jaffna
by the LTTE to have recruitment sessions. A Student's
Revival Week was
announced beginning 6th June targeting students in the
mid-teens who were
to be subjected to intense propaganda and the screening
of action videos.
Schools are now grinding to a halt as parents and teachers
fear for the
children. In recent weeks there have been several amazing
instances of
unorganised and spontaneous resistance by parents and
teachers to the
LTTE. The latter have used desperate methods to enter
schools whose
authorities and parents tried to prevent them. Principals
have been
manhandled and veiled threats issued against individual
teachers. Even
this resistance may fall apart in the face of the LTTE's
resolve to
recruit their targetted 10,000 cadre, if the Government
continues to bomb
and shell civilian areas! Confronted with public demonstrations
of
disenchantment in earlier times, the LTTE's reflex has
been to provoke the
opposing state power into a violent response that was
as severe as
it was blind.
In the East the recruitment was concentrated during the
ceasefire period
of early January to April 19th. One means used to collect
children was
the screening of video recordings of military operations
such as Elephant
Pass and Pooneryn. One catergory of youth in the Amparai
district among
whom the LTTE recruited a significant number are cow hands.
These were
boys mainly in the age group 12 - 16 years who had dropped
out of school
for reasons of poverty.
There were several cases where youngsters were forcibly
taken by the
LTTE. In one case two boys of ages 15 & 18 respectively
from the Ampari
District who later walked through the jungles to Urani
in the Batticaloa
District said that they had been forced by the LTTE which
otherwise
threatened to set fire to their houses. In Kallar people
complained to
the STF that LTTE recruiters were forcibly taking four
boys in a north-
bound public bus towards Batticaloa. They were rescued
by the STF at the
Cheddipalyam check-point. The incident was reported in
the press and was
independently confirmed by us. A technique commonly employed
was for an
LTTE cadre to lure a school boy away to a lonely place
by asking him for
a lift on his bicycle.
Even for children who went on their own, the transience
of the attraction
clearly revealed itself. In the Batticaloa District ,
unlike in LTTE
controlled Jaffna, many of the boys were able to escape
and go into
hiding or surrender to the Army, provided they had not
been sent to
Jaffna immediately. There was also the operation
of a herd instinct.
Often boys joined as a group and deserted as a group.
In Veechukalmunai,
four joined after a video session, and all four later
returned home.
There are several cases of this kind. One of the LTTE's
operations during
the ceasefire was to launch boy-hunts for youngsters with
cropped hair
(the first thing done upon recruitment) who were in hiding.
Around Batticaloa town itself more than 40 youths, both
escaped and
deserted from the LTTE recently, were handed over to their
parents by the
Army through various channels. Other sources in the North
said that during
the ceasefire, about seven MRS buses brought Eastern
youth for training
in Mullaitivu- a total of more than 500. The age group
they said was below
15 and sometimes less than ten. The total number recruited
or conscripted
from the East during this period is placed at about
1500 - some put it
below this figure and others estimate figures as high
as 3000. The
majority of the recruits were from certain parts of Batticaloa
District
including Kiran and Sittandy areas. Knowledgeable sources
place the total
number recruited in Trincomalee District at much below
200.
Addressing the issues: Some first steps
The use of children as combatants in the manner it is
done brings out
certain features of the Tamil struggle in its present
debased form. Apart
from condemning the LTTE for methods of this kind, we
need to understand
other important factors which contribute to this
tragedy.
From past experiences with the Security Forces,
most Tamils do feel
insecure. Even people who stayed in refugee camps during
1990 were taken
away by the Security Forces and hundreds of them disappeared
(eg. Eastern
University). Most of the poor who live in interior villages
in the
Eastern Province have undergone tremendous hardships resulting
from the
total disregard with which they have been treated
by the State.
Invariably every family has been affected by Security
Forces activity.
Their constant disabilities range from threat to
their life, to a
breakdown of economic activity. Young children continue
to live with
bitter memories amidst fear. Their internalized anger
is being
effectively harnessed by the LTTE in various ways.
Unless the voices of people who are marginalised are heard
and responded
to, the present trend will continue. Owing to the chauvinist
ideology in
which most members of the Security Forces have been moulded,
they are
unable to respond creatively to the dilemma of ordinary
Tamils, and find
it more congenial to rely on the use of terror.
The grim fate staring at these children scarred by the
war poses a major
challenge for democratic forces in the South that are
working for peace.
They need to understand the predicament of the ordinary
Tamil people and
consistently uphold their interests by making the Security
Forces
accountable.
Moreover, the Government needs to take the initiative
to monitor the
activities of the Security Forces especially in the interior
villages. The
reality in Jaffna too needs clear understanding. The children
are growing
up in a militarised environment, having constantly faced
bombing and
shelling. They have been in every sense trapped by a force
which sees
children chiefly as cannon fodder.
Suicidal attacks and cyanide carrying cadre symbolise
the overall nature
of the political trend. If it cannot attain its goal of
achieving
uncontested power (ie. Eelam) , it will commit both itself
and the
section of Tamil society within its ambit to collective
suicide. This is
the inescapable direction of its logic.
How do we break this vicious circle? If the Government
is prepared to
accept that the politics of the past, with its narrow
sectarian ends, had
created the present crisis, it is necessary to look into
every aspect of
life which has been affected by it.
Has the Government any message for the children, the marginalised,
and
the youths in Tamil society ? If so, are there any
concrete programmes
to educate and guide the Armed Forces who are the only
representatives of
the Government in the war zones? Are there any structures
which have been
vested with adequate powers to give effect to such programmes?
Is there
any qualitative change in the outlook of the military
to encompass the
complex reality of the present and the ethnic nature of
the conflict?
Then, how do Tamils themselves deal with this phenomenon
of child
warriors? We can no doubt academically explain the present
reality. But
can we justify it and allow this trend to continue when
we can clearly
see that its outcome is necessarily the total destruction
of our
community? In the present reality where ordinary Tamil
people are
powerless, some perceive it as a neccessity
to preserve the LTTE with
its child battalions comprising other people's children,
as a means to
extract a political solution from the Government. Hence
all criticism is
muted. But the hypocrisy of this position becomes evident
from the fact
that it is nearly always voiced by elites from outside
the North East and
by a few in Jaffna whose children have been secured means
of escape. On
the other hand the victims and prospective victims in
the North-East are
daily voicing their doubts in several ways about the politics
which is
neither defensive nor liberating. Tamil opinion makers,
politicians and
expatriates must look at the fate that awaits these children
and the
community, and rethink the roles they are playing now.
At a broader level, can we allow such collective brutalisation
to
continue in the name of patriotism, national integrity
and sovereignty;
or of the right to self determination and liberation?
We do know from
experience that these notions are only rhetorical in the
absence of any
corresponding substance in the politics of either side
that could give
them realisation.