In contrast to the uncertainties that plague
lowlanders when it comes to questions of identity, the highlanders of Northern
Luzon, inhabitants of the Cordilleras - collectively known as the Igorots
- had always a strong sense of their own. As a child making the annual
trek up there with my family - to Baguio, City of pines - of course I did
not have any notion of that. We went so we all could take a break from
Manila’s murderous heat. The pine trees, the cool mountain air, the horses
at Wright Park, and the boats at Burnham Park’s mini-lake, were the sum
and content of a child’s vacation. The people there formed some kind of
vague backdrop, not quite the same as "us": I had a crude sense even then
that these highlanders were significantly different, though in what ways
I had no idea. Only much later, as an adult already engaged in explorations
of the self both as an intermittently evolving individual and a historical
creature situated within a particular, irreversible context, did I start
to articulate that distinction. Being intimately familiar with the cultural
issues that lowlanders continually agonized over - who is Filipino? What
constitute a Filipino’s distinct make-up? - and the fact that we’ve had
so many influences over the past millenium, I knew there was much to learn
from the Igorots.
They and the Muslims - having most resisted
the colonial incursions of the Spanish conquistadors and friars - had less
cause to question their identity. Even the Americans, a little more successful
that their predecessors, had only nominal control in their respective areas.
Today, that tradition of resistance to outside influence continues. In
Muslim Mindanao the well-armed Moro National Liberation Front has, since
the 1970’s, embodied that tradition. In the Cordilleras the front chosen
has been that of culture (though there is also armed struggle but as part
of a nationwide campaign on the part of the New People’s Army). Which is
not to say there haven’t been any inroads made by the outside world. On
the contrary, signs abound, but in the Igorot and Muslim regions there
is a clear sense of what antecedents are rooted in the pre-Hispanic past.
Unfortunately, their histories have been undervalued
and distorted, often deliberately, by the Christian majority (a direct
result of the West’s success), even though they can be seen as more"Filipino"
than many of us, granted that "Philippine" and "Filipino" are problematic
terms. Is it surprising then, that in a global zeitgeist that encourages
a rediscovery of ethnic and cultural roots, Baguio should emerge as one
of the most vital centers of art today in the Philippines?
Homegrown aesthetics
The group of artists most responsible for
this emergence is the Baguio Arts Guild, or BAG. The city’s present role
as a catalyst for Cordillera artists, and as a center, through BAG’s bi-annual
festival of art activity began shortly after the Marcoses fled Manila,
involuntarily ending their twenty-year tyrannical rule. The subsequent
mood of euphoria saw a lot of windows thrown open to get rid of the musty
air. By that time, the artists soon to found BAG had all returned to Baguio,
or had Baguio chosen as their base. One of them was Santiago Bose, a painter
and an installation artist. In a piece written for an Australian journal,
Bose says his return from New York to the city of his birth came about
due to several factors, not the least of which was his dissatisfaction
"with working from an international cultural center which had, to a large
extent, marginalized the cultural production of a country like mine. When
I returned, it was evident that art practice in the country had flourished,
and many of the more established artists and intellectuals were also beginning
to return from overseas endeavors."
Back too were Ben Cabrera, after thirteen
years of being based in London; filmmaker Kidlat Tahimik; and Roberto Villanueva,
a performance and installation artist, returning from a two-year stint
in Europe. The assemblage was fortuitous and after several meetings among
the aforementioned and with other Baguio-based artists such as Willy Magtibay,
performance artist Rene Aquitania and photographer Wig Tysmans, the guild
was born with Bose as its president.
In November 1989 BAG held its first
arts festival which ran for ten days. Fittingly, the theme of the first
festival was "Rediscovering the Watering Hole of Our Creativity."
Featuring visual arts and the crafts, installations, video, photography,
music, dance, theatre and poetry, the Festival drew sizable crowds, and
attracted a sprinkling of international performers, including Kulintang
Arts, an Asian American dance group from San Francisco, and a traditional
Japanese ensemble.
So far, the Guild has had four festivals.
With the last one, the theme being Salubungang Agos (Cross Currents), the
festival decided to formally go international, inviting artists, photographers,
performance groups and critics from Australia, Japan, Singapore, Thailand,
Indonesia and the United States. (The U.S. - based artists included myself
and two media artists, Yong Soon Min and Allan de Sousa working on a collaboration
multimedia installation entitled Geography of Desire where the intent was
to explore through personal and historical narratives the impact of colonialism
on desire.) The consensus of local and foreign artists was that the festival
was a huge success, in spite of logistic limitations and the barely adequate
funding.
The acclaim reaped by the Festival has led
to many offers for outside groups to manage future events, but guild members
stress that their commitment to an artist based organization is, as Bose
puts it, "an integral aspect of the Festival’s rationale." BAG’s success,
with its stress on homegrown aesthetics has been essential to creating
an alternative movement, away from an overdependence from the West. And
Manila. The guild has thus emerged as a vehicle for empowerment, a way
of controlling and creating their own images rather than letting those
from the outside take primacy. Here in a microcosm is the continuing dialectic
between Third World assertions and First World control of information.
Here too lies a dialectic between Baguio and Manila, in many ways an extension
of the First World. In terms of cultural production, and in its exhibition
in galleries and museums, Manila has been largely the feeding-and breeding-ground
of those artists who, as critic Marian Pastor Roces put it in a recent
essay Ethos Bathos Pathos, "are fully committed to Euro-American art history,
and who produce work precisely calibrated vis a vis that history," with
the caveat that "this person will likely remain shunted out of all existing
centers of art-cum-political power." True enough: of the large contingent
of artists, who have ventured abroad over the decades, only a handful have
made their mark. I don’t mean having exhibitions, and distribution deals
with galleries, but getting the critic to sit up and take notice. Part
of the problem of course is the ever-pervasive bias against people of color.
In this regard, it will be interesting to follow the career of Los Angeles-based
Manuel Ocampo, the current hot Filipino star. His remaining an object of
desire for the critics depends not just on his talent (quite formidable)
but on such non-aesthetic matters as the politics of race, and who notices
and who buys him. Ocampo has shrewdly displayed his Filipinoness commendably,
whereas a number of previous artists who have made an impact on the Western
world - Ossorio comes to mind - did not. Whether or not Ocampo continues
to do so will depend on how deep his commitment is to his own visions,
and his resistance to market forces.
Cultural Autonomy
However imperfect, efforts of the
Baguio based artists and BAG must be related to the context of the ongoing
struggle to reclaim both cultural and psychic territory from the invader,
nowadays more likely to wear the mask of pop culture and the glittery garb
of the so-called "international" style than a military uniform. In
a larger context, Baguio’s eclipse of Manila parallels the demand for more
autonomy from Malacanang by local governments, the growing insistence among
cultural workers and creators on reevaluating whom and what exactly they
look to for ideas and inspiration, echoing the rethinking of political
alliances to suit regional aspirations.
The domestic shift in political and cultural
emphasis is manifested globally by the resurgence of ethnic-based nationalism
and the revival everywhere of homegrown art, that is, art more evidently
reflective of the artist’s own history. In its extreme it leads to
repugnant phenomena such as ethnic cleansing that must be condemned unequivocally:
an irrational, fratricidal attempt to turn the clock back and reinvent
both peoples and cultures.
Though at times it may appear that way,
the Baguio art movement is not about atavistic impulses. As Bose
states, " It isn’t a question of wearing a G-string again. It’s more
of a conceptual thing." More of a reckoning then, a reconfiguration,
even reassessment, of the modern Filipino as he/she is situated: influenced
(some would say burdened) by a geography and a history that is like no
other, with the ambivalent baggage of a colonial past side by side with
modernist sensibilities and the tribal, communal self.
The parallels between attempts at cultural
autonomy and an emphasis on regional government, are no mere coincidence.
In this sense BAG is one of thousands nongovernmental organizations, or
NGOs, that have come about during the past decade in response to the endemic
faults and inequities of the socio-political-cultural system. Of
course, in the everyday world of the Filipino, faced with the increasingly
difficult task of survival, history and geography tend to faed into the
background, but never entirely. The efforts of the Bguio artists
to rule their own destinies and not rely on some outside force, whether
residing in Manila or in the tonier confines of Europe and North America,
or Tokyo, has touched an ancient nerve.
In one of Bose’s installations, Pasyon at Rebolusyon, with its
explicit reference to Reynaldo Ileto’s book Payson and Revolution (a seminal
work on the peasant aspirations for independence contextualized through
sacred texts on Christ’s sufferings), indigenous materials, local iconography
including a Katipunan flag, inscriptions and miniature figures make up
an ironic and highly eloquent altar. In many ways it continues his
often humorous (I call him the gangsta/pranksta of Baguio arts0 attemts
to articulate the feelings of those whom Bulosan terms "the nameless in
history".
For Ben Cabrera, the last festival’s
chairman, what has been crucial is the interaction between these mountains
and the Baguio artists: "The Cordilleras have ahd a strong influence on
the Baguio artists, over those with international stature. The culture
here is still very Philippine." In his own work, he has been influenced
by the sense of form the Cordillera artists have, evident in the sculptural
elements of his paintings. "There’s also a strong sense of function
here. A farmer can carve a beautiful stool or a bulol. There’s
a raw quality to the art here. In Manila, the art is fine, smooth,
very sellable."
That rawness is one of the essential
differences between artmaking in Manila and artmaking in Baguio, evidenced
in the presence of both a communal and spiritual element in the latter.
What happened for a very long time in Manila art was the creation of works
based on aesthetics that were often divested of culture, so that they would
have what is termed an "international style", and couyld then be placed
on a global, i.e. Western art market. Any time you divorce art from
the culture from which it springs, you emasculate it, and in effect reinforce,
rather than deconstruct, the whole process of colonization.
In contrast, BAG artists acknowledge
the shamanistic, the rituals, the tradtions. If Bose is the movements
gangsta/pranksta, then Roberto Villanueva, Willie Magtibay and John Frank
Sabado are among its neo-shamans. Villanueva’s installations clearly
reiterate the importance of traditional ritual and symbol, often with him
at the center, using such forms as the dap-ay-a circle of stone seats and
a hearth at the center, where village elders gathered to discuss important
matters- and ritualistic offerings, like the spirit boat, to animist spirits,
as reminders of a center we all need to retreat to. One of his best
known and loved works was his 1989 gigantic installation of bamboo and
rono reeds, The Labyrinth. Built around a dap-ay, the construction
was playful, meditative, a lyrical homage to a past still viewed as nourishing
matrix. Magtibay too has used the dap-ay both as icon to be contemplated
and as functional space. Sabado uses dreamscapes and imagrey to express
both individual and ancestral memories.
Indeed, in the witty video installations
of Kidlat Tahimik, in Aquitania’s performances and, last December, those
of Singaporean Chandrasekaran, Manila’s Enrico Labayen and his Lab Projekt
and groups such as Australia’s Gong House and Mindanao’s Kaliwat, the focus
has been on the reassertion of the native self and on the recontextualization
of traditional iconography. It has meant an opening up in directions
previously looked down on as "folk art", the freedom to utilize Philippine
icons, mythology, popular images and to utilize as well native material,
from handmade paper to bamboo, woven mats, reeds.
The bi-annual festival has encouraged other regional art groups
to honk their horns: artists from Pampanga, the Bicol region, Bacolod,
and Davao have exhibited in Baguio and some have had festivals of their
own. The Guild, however, if it is to continue growing must endeavor
to expand the role of women within its ranks. Maybe there are few
women artists in Baguio but that should be reason enough to spur rather
than hinder the Guild.
In one sense, it is quite easy to misread
the Baguio artists so that it is possible, in the fever of elevating our
"ethnicity" that the works be consumed for the wrong reasons. In
a culture where the critical mass (that is, the premises and language of
criticism) has been largely shaped by Western culture, such a danger is
omnipresent. Again Roces puts it succinctly: "...there is obviously
a parallex problem. It deserves reiterating that the perception machine
imposes its own parameters. Those parameters, hegemonically constituted,
do not allow for the possibility that many Filipinos are not quite "readable"
within those self same parameters." To which it must be added that
the Cordilleras are not homogenous. Its many ethnic groups and languages
mean a diversity at least as rich as other areas of the archipelago.
In deed the Baguio artists are fortunate enough
to sit on top of deep artistic traditions and resources, from the coastal
Ilocos region to the remoter parts of the cordilleras. Like the gold
miners of Benguet, these artists have begun tapping the different lodes,
going into the recesses of a communal psyche to show the rest of us what
treasures lie buried there. That this is part of a worldwide phenomenon
has been noted frequently: the rediscovery of the small, the communal,
has been a gut reaction to the global corporate, MTV-like slickness of
much of contemporary representation. As BAG has shown, along with
their kindred spirits in other countries, rediscovering- and reinterpreting-
home is one of the more rewarding voyages at the end of this millenium.
|