THE IMPETUS THEORY
The development of the theory of impetus by medieval physicists
provided Galileo, in the late 1500 A. D. with a starting point for his own
speculations. The theory of impetus was set forth by the Parisian
philosopher Jean Buridan. It was based on observations about the motion
of objects that had been made by the Greek writer John Philoponus in the
sixth century A.D. John's intellectual sense was on the right track, but he
never fully developed the reason why it should be as he thought. Aristotle's
assertion that it was the air that provided the motive force responsible for
the violent motion of a body disturbed Philoponus. He reasoned if that
were true agitating the air behind a stone should move that object, which of
course it does not. Looking for an alternative explanation, he concluded
that there must be a motive force that resides within the stone itself. When
a force was imparted to a stone by another object, the stone absorbed the
force, moving a little faster, and simply continues on until air resistance or
a collision with another body stopped it. However, he gave no reason why
that should be the case, it seamed to him an elementary fact. Buridan gave
this hypothetical force of Philoponus the name "impetus" which depends
upon both the speed and the quantity of the mass in a body. He reasoned
that even after the body received this impetus force the body would
maintain that absorbed motion long after it lost contact with the mover. In
fact, the body being moved, under ideal conditions, would continue to
move in a straight line, at uniform speed forever, without interference
toward infinity. This idea is recognized as Newton's first law of mechanics.
But neither Buridan nor Newton gave a reason how or why the impetus
force should exist in the first place. Buridan also used his theory of
impetus to explain the behavior of falling bodies. Unlike many of Galileo's
contemporaries, Buridan claimed that rocks accelerate as they fall, but like
Aristotle, he wrongly assumed that a falling object acquired a velocity
proportional to its weight. He supposed that the weight added a quantity
of impetus to the falling rock, which increased its velocity, as it continued to
fall. The object consequently moved faster and faster as it descended, until
at last it struck the ground. However, it is an experimental fact, all objects
fall at the same rate of speed, on earth it is 32 ft. per second^2, regardless
of their weight.
However, this same rock away from the earth, ponderable mass, does
not immediately fall or move in any one direction; it simply floats around
in space. Nevertheless, it still exhibits that motive force function imparted
to it when it was attached to the earth, which operates within the rock. We
call it kinetic energy, a motional force the rock received while attached to
the rotating earth and now retains in space. The rock also obtained more
motional force from the Space-Shuttle rockets that put the ship into orbit
around the earth. The Space-Shuttle astronauts demonstrated this fact on
one of their missions. However, the rock simply floats around inside the
Orbiter, as though it is unaffected by the earth's gravitational field.
Nevertheless, it is effected by the gravitational field of the earth since it and
the Shuttle are being pushed toward the earth causing the Shuttle and all its
contents to fall in an orbit around the earth.
THE SPACE QUANTUM THEORY
The Space Quantum Theory proposes that space is quantized. It claims the
gravitational field is not caused by any attracting power of the sun or earth,
which would call for action at a distance, but rather it is motivated by the
'expansion of the universe.' That is, the expansion of the space quantum,
which I call the 'spacetron.'
The first law of thermodynamics states that "energy may not be created or
destroyed but rather only transferred from one system to another." The expansion
of the universal space quantum requires energy be given up by the space quanta
in the expansion process. This spacetronic energy (motion) is transferred from
one group to another. The energy transfer is a motional force that is transferred
by the contraction of another group of spacetronic units. Since all spacetrons are
in a state of expansion, the contracted group immediately expands generating an
'impetus force'. This motional energy is consequently transferred to other groups
of spacetronic units. This ''impetus force' exerts a pressure force on all physical
mass and energy throughout the universe.
The Space Quantum Theory claims that the expansion and the impetus motional
force is the cause of the gravity of the universe. The expansion force not only
generates the gravitational force that holds mass together, but it also maintains the
state of rest of mass, relatively speaking, which we call the inertia of mass and or
maintains its relative rectilinear motion as the case may be. This is the reason that
gravitational mass and inertia mass are equal, since they both arise from the same
cause, the expanding universe and the impetus force it generates
The result of this action is the creation of a moving contracting-expanding field
of spacetronic motional waves in all directions. It is these waves that act as an
impetus force that maintains the rectilinear motion of mass and energy so long
as they are not acted upon by any other external force. It is this impetus force
impinging on the internal particles of the atoms of mass that furnishes the motive
force, which keeps the atoms of mass moving after being set in motion.
The spacetronic field vibrates at the speed of light squared, thus each space
quantum unit maintains a standing wave vibration at the speed of light in any one
direction. Because of the second law of thermodynamics --"motion can only be
transferred from a higher state of motion to a lower state of motion and not the
reverse" -- the impetus force generated by the expansion factor vibrates half as fast
as the spacetronic field unit. It vibrates at the speed of light. It is a force that
moves all electrons around the protons creating the atom. It also travels at the
speed of light throughout the universe pushing physical mass and energy in their
vector direction of travel. It maintains the motion of mass and is the reason all
electromagnetic energy travels at the speed of light.
The History of Field Theory
Newton's penetrating mind paved the way for us to understand physical
realities. He claimed matter is real, undergoing changes which we
conceive as movements in space; space and time being real forms. To
deny the physical reality of space is like trying to denying the law of
inertia, its preposterous. We know that acceleration of mass is real,
therefore, space must be conceived as real within which acceleration
is produced.
This is the reason Newton called space "absolute." Besides space and
time to his mind there was a third independent reality, the force acting
between two material bodies that depended only on the distance
between them. He conceive this force as a condition associated
between particles.
Physicists after him considered there existed only two kinds of matter.
Matter that could be weighed and matter called electricity. Matter acted
upon each other under Newton's law of gravity, a force inversely
proportional to the distance between them. The particles of electricity
acted under the law of Coulomb forces, also inversely proportional to
the distance between them. However, there existed no law regarding the
forces that existed between particles that could be weighed and particles
that were considered electrical. I intend to bring to light the force that exist
between so called weighty particles and electrical particles.
Space was only considered as the stage upon which material occurrences
played a role. Empty space was not believed to be a carrier for physical
changes and processes. Newton conceived light as material particles
moving through empty space by means of a special force acting between
ponderable matter. Moreover, even in the eighteenth century it was
already clear from experience that light traveled in empty space with a
definite velocity, a fact which obviously fit poorly into Newton's
theoretical system, for why on earth should light particles not be able to
move through space with any arbitrary velocity?
Furthermore, the Huygens-Young-Fresnel wave theory of light over threw
Newton's theory that light was a particle. Their theory indicated that the
light waves caused the appearance of interference and diffraction. In fact,
this theory upset the view that everything real can be conceived as the
motion of particles in space. Light waves, were, after all, nothing more
than undulatory states of empty space, and space thus gave up its passive
role as a mere stage for physical events. I intend to show that even
ponderable matter is nothing more then undulations in empty space.
The ether was invented, penetrating everything, filling the whole of space,
and was admitted as a new kind of matter. The ether was considered to be
a sort of matter which could nowhere be removed. It was to some degree
identical with space itself; that is, something necessarily given with space.
Light was thus viewed as a dynamical process undergone, as it were, by
space itself. In this way the field theory was born as an illegitimate child of
Newtonian physics, though it was cleverly passed off at first as legitimate.
Faraday was the man who became fully conscious of this change in
outlook. He instinctively revolted against forces acting at a distance. In
his experiments with electricity, he claimed, if one electrified body attracts
or repels a second body, this was for him brought about not by a direct
action from the first body on the second, but through an intermediary
action. The first body brings the space immediately around it into a certain
condition which spreads itself into more distant parts of space, according to
a certain spatial-temporal law of propagation. This condition of space
was called "the electric field." The second body experiences a force
because it lies in the field of the first, and vice versa. The "field" thus
provided a conceptual apparatus which rendered unnecessary the idea of
action at a distance. Faraday also had the bold idea that under appropriate
circumstances fields might detach themselves from the bodies producing
them and speed away through space as free fields: this was his
interpretation of light.
Maxwell then discovered the wonderful group of formulae which seems so
simple to us nowadays and which finally build the bridge between the
theory of electro-magnetism and the theory of light. It appeared that light
consists of rapidly oscillating electro-magnetic fields.
After Hertz, in the '80s of the last century, had confirmed the existence of
the electro-magnetic waves and displayed their identity with light by means
of his wonderful experiments, the great intellectual revolution in physics
gradually became complete. People slowly accustomed themselves to the
idea that the physical states of space itself were the final physical reality,
especially after Lorentz had shown in his penetrating theoretical researches
that even inside ponderable bodies the electro-magnetic fields are not to be
regarded as states of the matter, but essentially as states of the empty space
in which the material atoms are to be considered as loosely distributed.
There exists among physicists a dissatisfaction with the dualism of a theory
admitting two kinds of fundamental physical reality: on the one hand the
field and on the other hand the material particles. Material particles as
structures in the field, that is, as places where the fields were exceptionally
concentrated. Any such representation of particles on the basis of the
field theory would have been a great achievement, but in spite of all efforts
of science it has not been accomplished. It must even be admitted that this
dualism is today sharper and more troublesome than it was years ago. This
fact is connected with the latest motivation of developments in quantum
theory, where the particle field theory verses the discontinuous particle
structure.
Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity
The special relativity theory owes its origin principally to Maxwell's
theory of the electro-magnetic field. This explains why his 1905 paper on
relativity was entitled: "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies."
"Electrodynamics" is the study of electric and magnetic forces, and in this
paper Einstein was concerned with explaining the way that electric and
magnetic fields act on moving charges and especially how these various
actions are interrelated. He combined this with the empirical fact that there
does not exist any physically distinguishable state of motion which may be
called "absolute rest." The theory also discarded the absolute character of
the conception of the simultaneity of two spatially separated events.
Up to that time the electric field and the magnetic field were regarded as
existing separately although Maxwell's field equations gave a close causal
correlation between the two types of field. But the special theory of
relativity showed that this causal correlation corresponds to an essential
identity of the two types of field. In fact, the same condition of space,
which in one coordinate system appears as a pure magnetic field, appears
simultaneously in another coordinate system in relative motion as an
electric field, and vice versa. This reduced the number of independent
hypotheses and concepts of field theory and heightened its logical
selfcontainedness characteristic of the theory of relativity. For instance, the
special theory also indicated as essentially identical conceptions' of inertial
mass and energy. Thus the equation: E = MC^2
Einstein's General Theory of
Relativity
The general theory of relativity starts from a fact of experience which
admits the equality of inertial and gravitational mass, or, in other the
words, the fact known since the days of Galileo and Newton that all bodies
fall with equal acceleration in the earth's gravitational field. (To me this
indicated that both are electro-magnetic in nature or else we would have to
deal with two different natures of space. Its like saying we need two
different sensory units: one for hearing and one in order to keep our balance
when in effect the ear system covers both sending messages to the brain.)
The theory uses a special theory as its basis but claims there is no state of
motion whatever which is physically privileged - that is, that not only
velocity but also acceleration are without absolute significance. It then
compels a much more profound modification of the conceptions of space
and time than were involved in the special theory. For even if the special
theory forced us to fuse space and time together to an invisible
four-dimensional continuum, yet the Euclidean character of the continuum
remained essentially intact in this theory.
In the general theory of relativity, this hypothesis regarding the Euclidean
character of our space-time continuum had to be abandoned and the latter
given the structure of a so-called Riemannian space. Before we attempt to
understand what these terms mean, let us recall what this theory
accomplished.
It furnished an exact field theory of gravitation and brought the latter
into a fully determinate relationship to the metrical properties of the
continuum. The theory of gravitation, which until then had not advanced
beyond Newton, was thus brought within Faraday's conception of the field
in a necessary manner; that is, without any essential arbitrariness in the
selection of the field laws. At the same time gravitation and inertia were
fused into an essential identity. The confirmation which this theory has
received in recent years through the measurement of the deflection of light
rays in a gravitational field and the spectroscopic examination of binary
stars is well known.
The Space Quantum Field Theory
Theories are compelled to pass more and more from the inductive to the
deductive method, even though the most important demand to be made of
every scientific theory will always remain: that it must fit the facts.
We now reach the difficult task of giving to the reader an idea of the
methods used in the mathematical construction which leads to Einstein's
general theory of relativity and to the Space Quantum Field Theory.
The general problem is: Which are the simplest formal structures that
can be attributed to a four-dimensional continuum and which are the
simplest laws that may be conceived to govern these structures? We then
look for the mathematical expression of the physical fields in these formal
structures and for the field laws of physics - already known to a certain
approximation from earlier researches - in the simplest laws governing this
structure.
The conceptions which are used in this connection can be explained just
as well in a two-dimensional continuum (a surface) as in the
four-dimensional continuum of space and time. Imagine a piece of paper
ruled in millimeter squares. What does it mean if I say that the printed
surface is two-dimensional? If any point P is marked on the paper, one
can define its position by using two numbers. Thus, starting from the bottom
left-hand corner, move a pointer toward the right until the lower end of the
vertical through the point P is reached. Suppose that in doing this
one has passed the lower ends of X vertical (millimeter) lines. Then
move the pointer up to the point P passing Y horizontal lines. The point P
is then described without ambiguity by the numbers X Y (coordinates). If
one had used, instead of ruled millimeter paper, a piece which had been
stretched or deformed the same determination could still be carried out: but
in this case the lines passed would no longer be horizontal or vertical or
even straight lines. The same point would then, of course, yield different
numbers, but the possibility of determining a point by means of two
numbers (Gaussian coordinates) still remains. Moreover, if P and Q are
two points which lie very close to one another, then their coordinates differ
only very slightly. When a point can be described by two numbers in this
way, we speak of a two-dimensional continuum (surface).
Riemannian Metric
Now consider two neighboring points P, Q, on the surface and a little
way off another pair of points P' and Q' . What does it mean to say that the
distance P Q is equal to the distance P' Q' ? This statement only has a clear
meaning when we have a small measuring ruler which we can take from one
pair of points to the other and if the result of the comparison is independent
of the particular measuring ruler selected. If this is so, the magnitudes of
the tracts P Q, P' Q' can be compared. If a continuum is of this kind we
say it has a metric. Of course, the distance of the two points P Q must
depend on the coordinate differences (dx. dy). But the form if this
dependence is not known before hand is of the form:
ds2 = g11dx2 + 2 g11 g22 dx dy + g22 dy2
Then it is called a Riemannian metric. If it is possible to choose the
coordinates so that this expression takes the form: ds2 = dx2 + dy2
(Pythagoras's theorem), then the continuum is Euclidean (a plane).
Thus it is clear that the Euclidean continuum is a special case of the
Riemannian. Inversely, the Riemannian continuum is a metric continuum
which is Euclidean in infinitely small regions, but not in finite regions. The
quantities g11, g12, and g22 describe the metrical properties of the surface;
that is, the metrical field.
By making use of empirically known properties of space, especially the
law of the propagation of light; it is possible to show that the space - time
continuum has a Riemannian metric. The quantities g11, g12, and g22 ,
applying to it, determine not only the metric of the continuum, but also the
gravitational field. The law governing the gravitational field is found in
answer to the question: Which are the simplest mathematical laws to which
the metric (that is the g11, g12, and g22) can be subjected? The answer
was given by the discovery of the field laws of gravitation, which have
proved themselves more accurate than the Newtonian law. This rough
outline is intended only to give a general idea of the sense in which Einstein
spoke of the "speculative" methods of the general theory of relativity.
The Expansion of The Space Quantum
Field
The general relativity theory that brought together the metric and gravitation
would have been completely satisfactory of the world had only
gravitational fields and no electro-magnetic fields were taken into
consideration. But it is not true that the latter can be included within the
general theory of relativity by taking over and appropriately modifying
Maxwell's equations of the electro-magnetic field. The gravitational fields
have a structural property of the space - time continuum and is logically of
an independent construction. The two types of field can not be causally
linked in this theory or fused to an identity. It can, however, scarcely be
imagined that empty space has conditions or states of two essentially
different kinds, and it is natural to suspect that this only appears to be so
because the structure of the physical continuum is not completely described
by the Riemannian metric.
The new Space Quantum Expanding Field Theory removes this fault by
displaying both types of field as manifestations of one comprehensive type
of spatial structure in the space-time continuum. The stimulus to the new
theory arose from the discovery that space is quantized and in a state of
expansion. My opinion is that our space-time continuum has a structure
of the kind vastly different than the one now contemplated.
The mathematical problem whose solution, in my view, leads to the
correct field laws is to be formulated thus: which are the simplest and most
natural conditions to which a continuum of this kind can be subjected? The
answer to this question which I will to give in a new paper yields unitary
field laws for gravitation and electro-magnetism.
click here to see more of the theory
Send comments to---
jhm1@worldnet.att.net (Jim Marshall)
Number of hits