Link-9

THE SPACE QUANTUM GAUGE THEORY

This brings one to a most interesting function of the universal spacetronic expanding field. It was noted that there was a slight difference in the rate of fall for iron than aluminum. Granted the rate is very small, but the difference is measurable. Neither the quantum mechanics nor relativity theory can account for this discrepancy, however, the space quantum theory has the logical reason for such a condition to exist. It has to do with the Space Quantum Gauge Theory. The expanding field holds all mass and energy together without regard to makeup or size or shape of an object both terrestrial and celestial, however, each unit has a dimensional range or gauge according to its makeup. The spacetronic pressure has various levels of compression that locks in, forming a barrier field that chokes off any further compression. The first gauge field which determines the dimension, quantity and force being the spasonic field of which all mass is composed. Three string units bind together, one for each of the three dimensions of space, the fourth dimension, expansion, performing a barricade that chokes off any further accumulation of compressed units. This mass unit, called a spason, forms a gyroscope that maintains a conglomerate of massed motion that moves in a specific direction relative to the spacetronic field as a whole, unless compelled to change that relationship by an outside force. The next gauge field called a quark is formed by the association of three spasons. The quarks do not exist outside the proton or neutron field as separate units. As a matter of fact, they too associate in groups of three to form a neutron or proton which is the next highest gauge field. Neutrons and proton combine in various combinations that forms atomic nuclei starting with a single proton up to the combination of 235 units. The neutralizing gauge field that creates separate different kinds of atoms is called the electron, one for each of the protons that exist in the nucleus of the atom. The proton-electron pair being a decomposed neutron. These electrons absorb and release any excess energy imposed upon the atom. Atoms in this manner stay in equilibrium with the expanding spacetronic field. This gauge theory has to do with determining the dimensions, capacity, quantity, or force of space and energy as well as that of time. See Fig 20 Fig 9

The basic gauge or measurement of space is the spacetron or the smallest quantity of independent space; 2 x 10 ^-42 meters. The basic gauge of energy is Planck's constant h; 6 x 10 ^-34 J/sec. If one divides the basic gauge of space, the smallest quantity of space, the spacetron, into the smallest quantity of energy, h, they will arrive at the speed of light which is the gauge of the top speed of energy through the spacetronic field:

6 x 10 ^-34 J/sec / 2 x 10 ^-42 = 3 x 10 ^8 m/sec

This top speed of the photon through space impinges upon all mass via the spacetronic field it encounters. This field vibrates at C squared and carries all electromagnetic photons through space, at 3 x 10 ^8 m/sec, regardless of how they are created, . This velocity sets the basic rate of speed for energy traveling through the universe as a whole; the basic time gauge being the second. The basic space gauge measurement 2 x 10 ^-42 meters, the spacetrons wavelength.

Dividing this small quantity of space into the speed of light determines the frequency of vibration of the space units:

3 x 10 ^8 m/sec / 2 x 10 ^-42 m = 1.5 x 10 ^50 cycles per second.

By multiplying this frequency, by the smallest quantity of energy, Planck's constant h, one arrives at the energy of the spacetronic field:

1.5 x 10 ^50 c/sec x 6 x 10 ^-34 j/sec = 9 x 10 ^16 J/c/sec or 5.6173 x 10^35 eV.

CONCLUSION

As Stephen W. Hawking said in the conclusion of his book, A Brief History of Time --- "We find ourselves in a bewildering world. We want to make sense of what we see around us and to ask: What is the nature of the universe? What is our place in it and where did it and we come from? Why is it the way it is?"

Men from all ages have asked these same questions time and time again, as you probably have yourself. I myself have asked these same questions, however, I do not find the world bewildering and I guess the reason I do not is because I accept it the way it is, like the answer God gave Moses when Moses ask, Whom shall I say to the people of Israel sent me, "and God answered unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you". Ex.3,14.

I try to understand the nature of the universe and the people in it as best I can and I accept both as the way they are; they are the way they are, and we know them by their actions, just as I am the way I am because that is the way I am and for no other reason. The only true way to explore the universe is by the empirical method. One must adapt their self to new facts as these unfold under investigation. As Einstein said, "Theory finds the justification for its existence in the fact that it correlates a large number of single observations, but one should not slur over the important part played by intuition and deductive thought in the development of an exact science, for it is in both these aspects the "truth" of a theory lies."

The picture of the world I presented in this book came to me in a very unusual way. I tried to develop it in harmony with the facts of physics and cosmology as we know them today, according to the way I understanding them. I have not found any fact or experiment that wound prove the theory wrong and if any exist I would appreciate being told what they are. For although I think my analysis of the universe in general is the correct view, or I wouldn't have written it in the first, I'm sure there will be people who will disagree with me. My only hope is for helpful criticism. Once we fully comprehend the meaning of the spacetime that Einstein discovered which I have chose to call "The Universal Spacetronic Expanding Field", which embraces the "Space-Time-Energy" concept, then we will be able to devise ways to tap into this vast energy source that, by far, will surpass the electromagnetic field that has been a boom to our present generation.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

..AUTHOR.............TITLE..................PUBLISHER..........YEAR ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Pagelis, Heinz R.....Perfect Symmetry.......Simon Schuster.....1985

Herbert, Nick........Quantum Reality........Anchor Press.......1985

Sutton, Christine....The Particle Connection..Simon Schuster...1984

Cadogan, Peter.......From Quark to Quasar.....Bridge U.Press...1985

Reeves, Hurbert......Atoms of Silence.......The M.I.T.Press....1984

Russell, Bertrand....The ABC of Relativity..First Mentor Press.1985

Mook, Delo E.........Inside Relativity .....Princeton U.Press..1987

Einstein, Albert.....Relativity.............Crown Publishers...1952

Skinner, Ray.........Relativity.............Blaisdell Pub.Co...1969