An idea I found in an interesting book:

"And so, I raise no objection to television's junk. The best things on television are its junk, and no one and nothing is seriously threatened by it. Besides, we do not measure a culture by its output of undisguised trivialities but by what it claims as significant. Therein is our problem, for television is at its most trivial and, therefore, most dangerous when its aspirations are high, when it presents itself as a carrier of important cultural conversations".

extracted from a book by Neil Postman "AMUSING OURSELVES to DEATH" page 16

THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY & SOME FOR FUN

AMAZON - THE MIGHTY
Everything from soup to nuts (;-o)
B_B_C
Everything ELSE [:-o)
COLUMBIA, THE GEM
VISUAL CHAOS AVAILABLE
  1. Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able to do so?
  2. Then he is not all-powerful.
  3. Is he able to prevent evil, but not willing to do so?
  4. Then he himself is evil.
  5. Is he both able and willing to prevent evil?
  6. Then where does evil come from?
  7. Is he neither able nor willing to prevent evil?
  8. Then WHY call him God?
WHAT THE WORLD SAW 5 YEARS AGO IN 1998 (of course now much improved)

A CENTENARIAN

THE NEW IMPROVED 2007 MODEL - A BIT OLDER AND WISER (working toward the 'CENTENARIAN' prize - only 25 yet to go!)

THAT CENTENARIAN(NOW PLUS) WITH FEWER TREES AND A NEW ROOF

NEXT: MY DOG SAM
BACK:

I Support the Dragon Lovers
barnesandnoble.com Home Page