REPORT ON THE 2nd YEAR 2000 FOR THE DMU 107 QDM DEMONSTRATION
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM
DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM
HUNTER AND LANDOWNER FEEDBACK PROGRAM
There was a survey taken at this event and counted by DNR Supervisor Doug Reeves, Bay City District. Mr. Mark Yenkel organized a very positive town meeting. Mr. John Wolfe, Clare School District Representative, served as facilitator. Everyone had an opportunity to speak and No one was against the concept of QDM. The question on the survey concerning the DMU 107 QDM five-year demonstration showed 94% support. Last years town meeting held on February 6 2000 showed 90% support.
DNR LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
RESULTS OF COLLECTING DMU 107 BIOLOGICAL DATA
DMU 107 QDM (5) YEAR DEMONSTRATION BIOLOGICAL HARVEST DATA MINIMUM BUCK STANDARD 3 POINTS ON ONE SIDE DATA FROM GLADWIN & HARRISON FIELD OFFICES AND STATE HIGHWAY CHECK STATIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANTLERLESS DEER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAWNS | ADULT DOES | TOTAL ANTLER -LESS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR | MALE FAWNS | % OF TOTAL | DOE FAWNS | TOTAL FAWNS | AGE 1 1/2 | AGE 2 1/2 | AGE 3 1/2 | AGE 4 1/2+ | AVERAGE AGE | TOTAL DOES | |||||||||||||||||||||
1996 | 17 | 22 | 13 | 30 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 3.5 | 48 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1997 | 25 | 18 | 21 | 46 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 27 | 2.85 | 90 | 136 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1998 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 25 | 17 | 13 | 20 | 22 | 3.26 | 72 | 97 | ||||||||||||||||||||
BASE DATA 3 YR. AVG. | 20 | 19 | 14 | 34 | 20 | 18 | 13 | 19 | 3.12 | 70 | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 22 | 10 | 31 | 53 | 43 | 42 | 34 | 41 | 3.18 | 160 | 213 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 23 | 11 | 32 | 55 | 35 | 50 | 32 | 30 | 3.01 | 147 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADULT BUCKS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR | AGE 1 1/2 | PTS 2-3 | PTS 4-5 | PTS 6-7 | PTS 8+ | PTS AVG. | % OF TOTAL | AGE 2 1/2 | PTS 2-6 | PTS 7-8 | PTS 9+ | PTS AVG. | % OF TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||
1996 | 77 | 31 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 4.28 | 79 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 7.41 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
1997 | 124 | 43 | 32 | 22 | 16 | 4.65 | 78 | 24 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 7.08 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
1998 | 106 | 30 | 26 | 35 | 10 | 4.98 | 78 | 21 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 7.4 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
BASE DATA 3 YR. AVG. | 102 | 35 | 27 | 24 | 10 | 4.67 | 78 | 21 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 7.28 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||
1999 | 138 | 5 | 49 | 52 | 29 | 5.85 | 68 | 47 | 12 | 24 | 9 | 7.45 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
2000 | 79 | 4 | 26 | 34 | 15 | 5.97 | 47 | 53 | 9 | 32 | 12 | 7.71 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADULT BUCKS | DOE TO BUCK HARVEST RATIO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR | AGE 3 1/2 | PTS 2-8 | PTS 9-10 | PTS 11+ | PTS AVG. | % OF TOTAL | AGE 4 1/2+ | PTS 2-8 | PTS 9-10 | PTS 11+ | PTS AVG. | % OF TOTAL | TOTAL BUCKS | ||||||||||||||||||
1996 | 3 | 3 | - | - | 7.33 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 98 | 1:2.0 | |||||||||||||||||
1997 | 10 | 5 | 4 | - | 7.78 | 6 | 2 | 1 | - | - | 8 | 1 | 160 | 1:1.8 | |||||||||||||||||
1998 | 9 | 6 | 3 | - | 7.50 | 7 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 9 | 1 | 137 | 1:1.9 | |||||||||||||||||
BASE DATA 3 YR. AVG. | 7 | 5 | 4 | - | 7.60 | 5 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 8.33 | 1 | 131 | 1:1.9 | |||||||||||||||||
1999 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 (17 PT) | 8.87 | 7.5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.33 | 1.5 | 203 | 1:1.3 | |||||||||||||||||
2000 | 31 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 7.93 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9.1 | 3 | 168 | 1:1.1 | |||||||||||||||||
2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE: | AVERAGE NUMBER OF POINTS FOR THE 1 1/2 YEAR OLD BUCKS IN A QDM PROGRAM SHOWS A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE. THIS IS PRIMARILY DUE TO THE PROTECTION OF BUCKS FOUR POINTS AND UNDER. THE DMU 107 MINIMUM BUCK STANDARD OF 3 POINTS ON ONE SIDE PROTECTS APPROX. 50% OF THE 1 1/2 YEAR OLD BUCKS. THIS IS CONSIDERED A MINIMUM QDM PROGRAM AND THE RESULTS WILL SHOW IT. [THIS STANDARD SHOULD CREATE AN ADULT BUCK TO DOE RATIO OF 1:2 IF COMBINED WITH AN ADULT DOE TO BUCK HARVEST RATIO OF 1:1.4. (THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE FAWNS ),MAINTAINED AT LESS THAN 70% CARRYING CAPACITY AND THE AVERAGE AGE OF THE HARVESTED DOE BEING 2.5 TO 4.5 WITH THE LOWER AGE PREFERRED]. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE MID MICHIGAN BRANCH, QUALITY DEER MANAGEMENT ASSOC. THAT THE MINIMUM BUCK STANDARD FOR DMU 107 BE VOLUNTARILY UPGRADED TO 4 POINTS ON ONE SIDE MINIMUM FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND BUCK TAKEN. THIS WILL PROTECT 85% OF THE YEARLING BUCKS, AND PRODUCE BETTER RESULTS SOONER. THIS STANDARD SHOULD CREATE AN ADULT BUCK TO DOE RATIO OF 1:1.5 IF COMBINED WITH AN ADULT DOE TO BUCK HARVEST RATIO OF 1:1.1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A GOOD QDM PROGRAM MUST BE ASSOCIATED WITH HABITAT MAINTAINED FOR HIGH QUALITY FORAGE YEAR ROUND, AND WITH THE DEER POPULATION BEING NO MORE THAN 70% OF THE MAXIMUM CARRYING CAPACITY. USING POINTS AS A HARVEST STANDARD IN GOOD AREAS SUCH AS DMU 107 DOES NOT PROTECT THE BEST OF THE 1 1/2 YEAR OLDS. A BETTER METHOD WOULD BE TO USE ANTLER SPREAD OF 15", OR MAIN BEAM LENGTH OF 15". |