|
"The plight of the
Knickerbockers..." (December 23, 1997)
With Ewing out, where does that leave the Knicks? They don't have a chance at the title this
year, but they can make some noise. They look much smarter now for trading for Chris Dudley.
Dudley can play defence and rebound. That should help. He's not Ewing, but he'll almost as
good on the defensive end. Former young guns like Allan Houston and Larry Johnson will have
to step it up. If L.J. and Houston don't, they the Knicks fans will realize the team blew their
money in these two like Robert Downey at a coke dealer. The defence of L.J.'s relative offensive
decline was that he is an inside player and that is Ewing's domain. Ewing plays down low that's
it. He'll go as far as 15 feet but no further. The post is no place for two men, especially both
who demand the ball. This is a lame excuse. L.J. acceded to Ewing. L.J. was supposed to be the
man down low on the second unit. That never materialized. L.J. played with Alonzo Mourning.
Zo plays very similar to Ewing. Both down low, both with good jump shots. L.J. and Zo both
put up good numbers. With the Knicks, L.J. pretty much was average. Now it's put up or shut
up for the $84 million man. He still has skills but he has to prove it. There is no other low post
threat on the Knicks. He is now the man, offensively. They need him regain his lost game.
They need him to score 22 a game and pull down over 10 boards. He needs to become the
dominate force he once was. The Knicks and Ewing have destroyed other power forwards,
turned small forwards. Charles Smith, formerly of the Clippers, was a 20 ppg, 8 board guy on
the Clips. He was the bomb. He was Mr. Fluid. He had it all on L.A. Him and D.R.M. (call
him Danny Manning) were like bread and butter, they were the Clips sustenance. They were
great. Smith was traded to the Knicks. His offense took a back seat to Ewing. He was told to
play small forward, a position he was uncomfortable and his game took a nose dive. It's hard to
switch back and forth between 3 and 4, playing two different positions with two different
guidelines. At 3, he was the third alternative behind Ewing and Starks and had to play deep on
the wing. That wasn't his game. Then all of a sudden. He has to play at 4 for five minutes at a
time after not playing there all game and then fed the ball down low by the back up point guard
who he doesn't play with all that much. It's hard. He wasn't up to it. Either was Larry Johnson.
It is the same thing with L.J. Neither could get into a rhythm because they were never given a
chance to get that rhythm in the same place. They couldn't run the same play for either Smith or
Johnson two or three times because there was Ewing on the court. Maybe now, L.J. can live up
to his pre-New York hype.
Allan Houston is also needed to add some scoring punch. The Knicks need to replace the loss of
Ewing's scoring. Houston was almost a 20 ppg guy on the Pistons. There, he showed his deft
touch, long range bombing abilities and even an ability to take it to the hole. He was in the dunk
contest, if anyone remembers. He can jump. The Knicks need him to be more aggressive. He
needs more confidence. To bad he doesn't have John Starks confidence, with Houston's skill.
Houston has talent. The Knicks will have to change their offense to get Houston more shots
where he likes it, as opposed to where Patrick dictates it. Houston needs to get the ball off
screens. This way he can elevate and get the open jumper. I don't think his greatest strength is
his outside game, it's his middle range jumper. He can score off screens with those 15-18
footers. He runs around screens almost like Reggie Miller, gets the ball and can get rid of it
quickly. Ron Mercer can really do that well. Houston will have to start scoring if the Knicks
have any chance of contending. It's not like Houston is an old man. He's young. As is L.J.
They have a lot of gas in the tank. They should be able to put in 35 minutes a game at their
positions, knock down 20 ppg each and help out on defence and rebounding. They have
complementary games. L.J. is predominately low post (and will dominate small forwards down
there) and Houston up top. Both can switch, although Houston's low post game is very
underrated. Personally, I think L.J.'s long range game is overrated, but he took a threes when he
came back from back surgery. Both can mix it up and it's up to those two to lead the Knicks to
victory.
Charles Oakley is old. You know you're getting strong defence and rebounding. He'll be playing
a lot of center with Ewing out. He's no scoring threat. Starks is well, Starks. Inconsistent at
best. And can't be counted on for a long period of time. Chris Mills will have to step up, since
the Knicks are likely to move L.J. to power forward for some stretches in the game with Mills are
small forward. Mills will have to show the Knicks what he did at Cleveland. Charlie Ward and
Chris Childs are pretty pathetic offensively. Ward's only claim to fame is he is the best
quarterback in New York. Both are good defensively, but neither will knock down 20 in a game.
Maybe combined in a rout, but that's it.
The Knicks need their two young rich stars, Houston and Johnson to step up. They need more
production in all facets of their game. They need their leadership abilities. While the loss of
Ewing will have repercussions this year, I believe it will do wonders for the team, as it prepares
for a the post-Ewing years (or at least, the declining Ewing years). As with the loss of John
Stockton (which gave more playing time to Jacques Vaughn and Howard Eisley), Scottie Pippen
(Toni Kukoc), Hakeem Olajuwon (Kevin Willis), Alonzo Mourning (Ike Austin), etc., Ewing's
loss will give more P.T. to the key Knick players, give them the ball more often, give them a
chance to win or lose the game in crunch time (as they will be the guys instead of Ewing) and let
them grow. Both Houston and L.J. are used to playing with superstars (Hill and Zo respectively
and Ewing together), but they will have to get used to playing together and being the primary
offensive threats. I think they can do it.
Return to the 1997 edition of Hoop-LA
| Return to Hoop-LA Home Page |
| |