Ironically,
the drain code which is supposed to assure proper continued drainage, does
very little in the way of maintenance. Elected drain commisioners
are reluctant to assess for routine, preventive maintenance.
Low-cost, environmentally sensible work is postponed until a large, expensive
project becomes urgent. Taxpayers end up footing huge assessments
for projects that are ruled as "necessary."
Unmaintained agricultural drains are a common sight. Lack of maintenance
in closed urban or suburban drains is hidden out of sight. Both lead
to system failures. Farmers, taxpayers, property owners and environmentalists
are united on this topic.
The drain code should have separate chapters--one for maintenance and
one for improvement. Only then can routine maintenance on existing
drains take place. Simple language for a simple concept--separated
from the complicated considerations that are involved in adding branches,
changing drain dimensions, adding capacity, rerouting streams, etc.
Farmers want maintenance which is a lot less expensive than reconstruction,
said Farm Bureau President Jack Laurie at the June 29 Senate Farming, Agribusiness
and Food Systems hearing on what would keep farms in business into the
next century.
WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT THIS?
1. Express your opinion to legislators.
Sen. McManus, chairman of the Senate Ag Committee, held a hearing
on June 29. (See News Briefs).
If
you couldn't get to MSU on that day, call or send a letter to your representative
(See Write Your Legislator). Ask him or
her to support drain code reform that makes routine maintenance easy but
contains safeguards in the areas of due process, property rights, taxation
and environmental protection when it comes to drain "improvements."
2. Speak out on the new legislation introduced
by Rep. Mike Green, HB 4803.
Rep. Green held a hearing on July 8 with the full Agriculture Committee
invited to attend. . If you weren't able to testify,
you can submit written comments to Rep. Mike Green, Chairman, House Committee
on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Room 252 Capitol Building, Lansing,
MI 48909-7514.
3. Support total drain code reform.
Many people in Lansing seem willing to settle for just a little reform
or, even worse yet, to add the ability to make super-sized drain districts--without
correcting the faults of the existing drain code. This expanded ability
to assess for projects involving whole river systems is the idea behind
a new Chapter 22 that has been written. On the surface, it is a logical
idea: treat the problems of a complete river drainage basin.
Other states have begun "watershed management" projects, but those same
states don't put drain commissioners in charge. If the faults of
the current drain code are not corrected, "watershed management" in Michigan
will just turn into a massive assessment scheme managed by drain commissioners
who have complete discretionary authority.
4. Continue to check back with this webpage,
keeping yourself updated with the News Briefs
section.