{ } = endnotes
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND HUMAN SUFFERING
The problems of evil and human suffering have always been complex.
Human suffering is a common denominator to man. Grief, pain,
disappointment, heartache, heartbreak, trials and tribulations often
occur in our lives. Having an adequate answer to the suffering found
in the world is something that is a "must" for the Christian. There
are three axioms which the Christian must affirm: (1) God is good and
wise; (2) God is all-powerful, and has the ability to achieve His
purposes, and; (3) Evil, both physical and moral, is a fact. With
these three axioms in mind, these questions then arise: "Why has God
allowed evil to exist?", "If God could prevent evil but will not, can
we then say that God is perfect in goodness?", "If God wishes to
prevent evil but cannot, can we then say that God is omnipotent?", and
"If God has both the power and the will, then why is evil still here?"
It is not the purpose of this paper to prove the existence of God.
We will, for our purposes here, presuppose the existence of God
(`i.e.': the God of the Christian theist). The challenge being dealt
with here is not "prove God." The challenge under consideration is
"reconcile the God of the Christian with the existence of evil." This
paper is concerned with whether or not evil in this world is, in fact,
enough evidence to disprove God's existence.
Good and Evil'
Almost from the beginning of time, as recorded in Scripture, we
have had the existence of good and evil. As we consider the book of
Genesis, the first portion of the book states, "In the beginning,
God...." When we speak of God we think of the spiritual Being who has
created, or brought into existence, all things past and present. We
know that during God's creative activity He created man and woman and
at the end of that creation stated, "It is very good." Shortly after
their creation, however, both good and evil existed on the earth. Man
and woman sinned by being disobedient to God and because of their sin
were driven from the Garden where God had placed them. With every year
that has passed, the problem of good and evil has con
tinued to plague man. Sometimes this occurs due to man's own inability
to understand why things happen. It is shortly after the fall of Adam
and Eve in the Garden that we find Cain slaying his brother Abel. Why
did Abel suffer? As God's creation, we have continually searched for
the answer concerning the problem of good and evil. Though we can
understand somewhat the cause of, and subsequent sorrow resulting from,
the departure of Adam and Eve from the Garden, it is difficult to
understand why a person like Abel suffered even when he was pleasing to
God. Actually this is where the problem lies.
Our difficulty stems `not' from trying to understand why the
`unrighteous' suffer, for in the minds of most men when the unrighteous
suffer they receive what they justly deserve. The difficulty in
understanding occurs when the innocent' or `righteous' suffer.
The Goodness of God
Let it be stated at the very outset that God is infinitely good
{1}. Let this not, however, become a problem which would cause faulty
reasoning in our life. Part of the problem arises from a
misunderstanding of the definition of the word "good," and using it in
reference to God. Paul Little states:
"Part of our problem arises from our limited definition
of the word `good' and our applying this term to God. Hugh
Evan Hopkins observes, `In his famous essay on Nature, John
Stuart Mill clearly sets out the problem with which thinkers
all through history have wrestled: If the law of all creation
were justice and the Creator omnipotent, then in whatever
amount suffering and happiness might be dispensed to the world,
each person's share would be exactly proportioned to that
person's good or evil deeds. No human being would have a worse
lot than another without worse deserts; accident or favoritism
would have no part in such a world, but every human life would
be playing out a drama constructed like a perfect moral tale.
Not even on the most distorted and contracted theory of good
which ever was framed by religious or philosophical fanaticism
can the government of nature be made to resemble the work of a
being at once both good and omnipotent.'" {2}.
"Perhaps the greatest test of faith for the Christian today
is to believe that God is good. There is so much which, taken
in isolation, suggests the contrary. Helmut Thielecke of Hamburg
points out that a fabric viewed through a magnifying glass is
clear in the middle and blurred at the edges. But we know the
edges are clear because of what we see in the middle. Life,
he says, is like a fabric. There are many edges which are
blurred, many events and circumstances we do not understand.
But they are to be interpreted by the clarity we see in the
center--the cross of Christ. We are not left to guess about
the goodness of God from isolated bits of data. He has clearly
revealed His character and dramatically demonstrated it to us
in the Cross. `He that spared not His own Son, but delivered
Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give
us all things?' (Romans 3:32)." .{3}.
Believing that God is good convinces a person that man at
his very best is capable of being good, since he is made in
the image and likeness of God. We know that goodness is better
than evil. Kindness is better than cruelty. Love is better
than lust. Self-denial and sacrifice are better than self-
aggression and selfishness. If there is a God, His nature
must contain all of those things that are good. If His nature
does not contain them, then as His creatures that makes men
better than God, causing them to despise Him,.{4}. who in
that case would be just the opposite of good. Christ tells us
that God is good. Christ lived a perfect life, exemplifying
all goodness, and told us that God is like that. Therefore we
have to hold many things, like disease and evil , in abeyance,
awaiting further light. We must hold to the fact that it is
impossible to believe that God is evil. On the other hand, if
God is evil, then from where does goodness come? By saying
this, we have replaced the mystery of evil by a gre ater
mystery of good. There is not a single thing in this world
that has the power to separate us from the love of God in
Christ (Romans 8:35-39). It is with this thought, that God
will keep us in His loving care, that we find a God of goodness,
love, fairness to all men, and One who has the power and ability
to control life. God blesses all men because He is a God of
love and a God of goodness.
The Problem of Evil and Human Suffering
Perhaps the most puzzling problem to man in relation to God's
existence is the problem of evil and human suffering. Why must evil
and suffering, and even death, exist in the world today? Often the
question is asked, "Why are the evil blessed?" This can also be
reversed to ask, "Why do the innocent suffer?". Why is it that a baby,
born full of innocence and purity, has its life snuffed out as it is
growing up? Why is it that through wars thousands of innocent people
are killed? We wond er how it is that God, who loves man so much,
should allow suffering to come into his life.
A Christian must approach the problem of human suffering by neither
denying the reality of suffering, nor trying to offer an "easy" way of
escape. The world was created by God, yet evil is real. It surrounds
us every day and according to the Christian view, man, the creature
made in God's image, is involved in this terrible and very real
conflict. The problems found are intense and deep. The question is
asked, "Why doesn't God do something?" The answer is: God `has' done
something, and `is' doing something.
"...God `has' done something about the problem of evil.
He has done the most dramatic, costly, and effective thing
possible by giving His Son to die for evil man. It is possible
for man to escape God's inevitable judgment on sin and evil.
It is also possible to have its power broken by entering into
a personal relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ. The
ultimate answer to the problem of evil, at the person level,
is found in the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ." .{5}.
False Answers to Evil and Suffering
There are many false answers that are given to the problem of
human suffering, yet which are inadequate. In almost any book of
philosophy of religion that deals with the problems of evil and pain
and suffering in our world, you will find these answers discussed.{6}
One of the answers given by a few is that suffering is just an
illusion.{7} Mary Baker Eddy and her followers insist that all
suffering is a product of twisted thinking, rather than actual reality
in the physical world. That is to say, suffering is not something that
is real, but is instead something you only `think' is real. Most
people, however, find it difficult, if not impossible, to accept this
point of view. When a loved one, who has been an intimate part of our
home, is taken away from us, it is very difficult for us to believe
that the pain we suff er is not real, but simply the product of twisted
thinking. Such a description of suffering is, to say the least,
unrealistic. Or, when someone who has been in good health for many
years finds his life blighted with a painful and incurable disease , it
is rather unconvincing to tell him that it is all in his mind, or that
it is simply the product of the wrong kind of thinking. The great
masses of people today are too realistic to accept this explanation of
evil and suffering.
Another explanation sometimes given for the suffering and pain in
the world is that these things are the result of man's own sin.{8}
This has in it so much truth that oftentimes it is easy for us to feel
it is the `whole' answer. There are many evidences that suffering is a
result of man's own sin. The man who drinks heavily eventually pays
the price in his own body, and often in the tangled strands of his own
life. The person who misuses his body in any way will inevitably pay
the price. The liar, the cheater, the hypocrite also eventually will
suffer, sometimes in this lifetime, and invariably in the lifetime that
is to come. To say that this is the explanation of `all' suffering,
however, is to speak too quickly. It explains `much' suffering, but it
does not explain `all' suffering. Think of innocent people who suffer.
The example from the Old Testament is the man, Job. Most of the book
of Job is devoted to the arguments of his friends who said, "Job, you
must have sinned a grievous sin because you're really suffering." The
answer continually came back from Job, "I have not sinned. I am
innocent." Therefore, there must be another explanation of suffering.
In the book of Luke our Lord was faced with the question.
"Now there were some present at that very season who
told him of the Galileans, whose blood Pilate had mingled
with their sacrifices. And he answered and said unto them,
Think ye that these Galileans were sinners above all
Galileans, because they have suffered these things? I tell
you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all in like manner
perish. Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell,
and killed them, think ye that they were offenders above all
men that dwell in Jerusalem? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye
repent, ye shall all likewise perish" (Luke 13:1-5).
The Lord is simply saying that these catastrophes did not come upon
them because they were more wicked than the rest. In the book of John
the same subject is discussed briefly.
"And as he passed by, he saw a man blind from his birth.
And his disciples asked him, saying, Rabbi, who sinned, this
man, or his parents, that he should be born blind? Jesus
answered, Neither did this man sin, nor his parents: but
that the works of God should be made manifest in him" (John
9:1-3).
Taking the word of Christ as final authority, we must then reject the
idea that sin in one's life is the `full' explanation of suffering.
Much suffering and evil come to the innocent without their having
deserved it in any way.
There is another explanation of suffering that some people offer,
which states that God just simply cannot do anything about it.{9}
This idea says, in essence, that God does not `want' suffering here,
because He is an infinitely loving God; but He is powerless to put it
out of the world. This is sometimes referred to as the "finitenes
s" of God..{10}. Yet we must look deeper, for there are many other
factors involved. We have a number of statements in the Bible that
indicate God is powerful beyond our comprehension. In Daniel there are
three Hebrew young men who are cast into a fiery furnace, all the whil
e uttering the statement, "Our God is able to deliver us" (Daniel
3:17). Their meaning was that God was able to do anything that He
needed to do. The Bible also declares that "With God all things are
possible" (Matthew 19:26). The explanation, the refore, that evil and
suffering are in the world because God is unable to cast them out, is
totally false and to be rejected.
Having suggested just a few inadequate explanation of the total
problem of human suffering and evil, we need to notice some principles
that will bring us to the right answer. There are several principles
which will help us in understanding the difficulty before us.
Proposed Solutions to the Problem
The Power of God--God Limits Himself
One principle we must bring ourselves to comprehend in relation to
the existence of good and evil in the world is that God limits Himself.
{11} This, in some respects, has a likeness to the finiteness of God,
as viewed by some philosophers. However, this limitation is not a
limitation imposed upon God by some external force, for there is no
external force in the universe that can limit God's power. The only
limitation upon God's power is a limitation that must be placed there
by God Himself. The very nature of the universe which God created and
designed makes it impossible for Him to do things that are mutually
exclusive or diametrically opposed. For example, God cannot be both
present and absent at the same time. He cannot create a mountain that
He cannot climb. He cannot dig a hole He cannot fill. He cannot make a
square circle. Actually, these are childish conundrums rather than
real impossibilities. These are certainly not limitations placed upon
God by Satan or by some other external force. They are simply
limitations which God included in the make-up of the universe--limitat
ions which allow Him to be consistent with His own eternal nature.
The Bible, in fact, speaks of certain impossibilities for God. In
Hebrews 6:18 the Scripture says that it is impossible for God to lie.
By the very nature of God, it is not possible for Him to lie. In James
1:13 we learn that "God cannot be tempted with evil, and he, himself,
tempteth no man." This is another impossibility with God. In the Old
Testament (Habakkuk 1:13) we find the statement that God cannot look
upon or countenance evil. All of this simply means that when God
created the universe, He created it in such a way that His own nature,
being what it is, makes it impossible for certain things to happen.
This is not a limitation upon God in the ultimate sense. It is merely
a limitation because of the nature of God.
This background prepares us to understand that when man was created
by God, he was created with freedom of choice and freedom of will.{12}
When God chose to make man a creature of freedom, the inevitable result
was intended to be good. God determined that man should not be merely a
robot, but a creature of freedom who could choose good. When man
chooses to love God, it has a real and deep significance. Deciding
that man should have freedom made it ne cessary that this freedom
include the possibility of not only choosing good, but also choosing
evil. Because man has freedom of will, there have been mistakes,
blunders, and wrong choices. The events of history give sufficient
evidence of the fact that man often chose wrongly and suffered as a
result of that choice.
The Nature of the Universe
A second observation which can be made is that the very nature of
the universe helps to explain some of the suffering and evil in the
world.{13} Think a minute of what man calls the "laws of nature."
As we look at the whole universe, it is a system of law and order a
system in which everything is good and faithful. Scientific
investigations made in one part of the world can be verified through
the same experiments in another. There is uniformity throughout the
natural laws of our universe. There must be, or the world would not
work properly. Principles true today must be true a year from today,
if they are indeed principles of law and nature. Principles true in
one part of the world must be true in another, else man would not know
how to build a civilization.
This uniformity, this system of law and order, also has much to do
with man's suffering in the world. For example, the natural laws of
the universe which God has created include certain principles which
enable man, if he uses the right elements and the right processes, to
create fire. Man does it now through the striking of a match, which is
simply a cooperation of the laws of the universe. The same principle
that enables man to have fire for cooking his meals and heating his
home also ena bles him to have fire which will burn his home and
destroy the lives of people. The principles that made it possible to
have fire for constructive purposes may be misused by man for
destructive purposes.
One of man's greatest achievements has been the production of the
automobile. But along with its fine uses, there have also been tragic
misuses. Similarly, steel, which makes great building possible, can
also be used for guns and tanks which destroy lives in war. The
principles of nature, if used properly, result in good; but if used
improperly, they have within themselves the power for destruction.
Laws Must be Constant and Faithful {14}.
The only basis on which a game can be played correctly is that
there are certain rules which must be followed in every instance.
Similarly, the only way in which a world can possibly work is for the
laws of nature and order to be constant and faithful. When man uses
God's laws of nature as he ought to use them, he prospers and is happy.
His well-being flourishes. But when he misuses those laws, he suffers.
The law of gravity is a wonderful and necessary thing, but its misuse
can bring tragedy, misfortune, and even death. So it is with the other
laws of our universe.
Now, apply these observations to the problem of suffering. When
God made man a creature of freedom, He opened the door to suffering.
It could be no other way. When God made the universe, He made it
possible for man to use his freedom to find the good. But this
inevitably included the possibility of evil and suffering. Why does
man suffer? It is often because he, or his ancestors, or his
neighbors, or his friends have misused their freedom. In some way they
have violated some of God's laws and have destroyed that which God
wished to be perfect and whole.
Is Suffering Always Evil?
When the subject of human suffering is mentioned, man generally
assumes that all suffering is evil. Let us examine this presupposition
to see if it is true. Is the negative value which we put on suffering
its `real' value in all cases?
Man's primary purpose in existing is to honor and gratify God.
This being true, everything that takes him away from God is evil, and
everything that brings him toward God is good.
When we accept this standard, we see the events of the world in a
different light. It is quite possible then that riches, honor and the
pleasures of this world are actually hindrances rather than helps. In
other words, they can be evil rather than good. It is quite
conceivable that illness, loss of money, or even the loss of friends
might ultimately serve some good purpose. Under certain circumstances,
poverty is better than riches. Jesus said, "A man's life consisteth
not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth" (Luke 12:15).
All too often worldly things blind us to the spiritual things and thus
they become curses to us instead of blessings--not just in this life,
but for eternity. Riches, honors, and pleasures are not necessarily
evils; they can be blessings. It depends on man's attitude toward them
and how he uses them. Do they draw him closer to God, or take him
farther away? No one would claim that suffering is good in and of
itself. But what is good is that through suffering man is often
brought into submission to God's will.
It is quite possible that the frowns of the world are better than
its honors. It is quite possible that illness is, in some instances,
better than health. Many would consider this completely unreasonable;
but remember, our primary concern in living is to honor and glorify
God. The man who spends some time on his back in a hospital room often
sees things in a clearer light than he ever saw them while he was going
through life without a care or a worry. This is not to say that when
we become sick there is rejoicing, but to accept illness in the proper
manner can be a blessing, both to the person involved and to those with
whom he comes in contact.
Suffering is Remedial
Much of the pain that we suffer is remedial in character.{15} It is
part of the deceitfulness of sin that so long as things are going well
with us there is little disposition to give up error and sin . It is
when we are hurt that oftentimes we see the need for God. It is by
suffering that we overcome. A man who has no sorrow in his life often
tends to be immature. Through suffering that accompanies hard work, we
develop physical stamina. I t is through suffering that we learn to
overcome the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of
life. Things that once looked so glamorous to us lose their appeal
following crises in which we come face to face with the real issues of
life.
There is a passage in the book of Hebrews which says God allows us
to suffer because of His love for us:
"For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth
every son whom he receiveth. It is for chastening that ye
endure; God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is
there whom his father chasteneth not? But if ye are without
chastening, whereof all have been made partakers, then are
ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore, we had the fathers
of our flesh to chasten us, and we gave them reverence: shall
we not much rather be in subjection to the father of spirits
and live? For they indeed for a few days chastened us as
seemed good to them; but he for our profit, that we may be
partakers of his holiness. All chastening seemeth for the
present to be no joyous but grievous; yet afterward it
yieldeth peaceable fruit unto them that have been exercised
thereby, even the fruit of righteousness" (Hebrews 12:6-11).
This is also what David meant when he said, "It is good for me that I
have been afflicted; that I may learn of thy statutes" (Psalm 119:71).
Suffering and Trials Build Character
Suffering has the power to beautify and ennoble the character and
the spirit of the one who suffers.{16} Some people seem to feel that
the love of God guarantees that they will be able to have everything
they wish, that life will simply be a "bed of roses," untarnished and
untainted by anything. This is unreasonable. God's love for man is
never described in the Scriptures as the soft, indulgent honoring of
the child in the manner that sometimes is attributed to grandfathers.
Rather, the figures of speech which the Bible uses to convey the
infinite love which God has for man are of such a nature as to indicate
discipline rather than license. God is pictured as a builder who cuts
and places stones in such a way as to make a beautiful edifice. He is
a Shepherd who devotedly cares for, but also guides, His flock for its
own protection. A father who genuinely loves his child must, from time
to time, cause that child to suffer through the administration of
discipline, lest that child destroy himself and bring upon himself
greater suffering by his own blunders. Loving care involves discipline!
If God promised immunity from suffering to those who followed Him,
men would serve God only out of self-interest. As a kind of cosmic
insurance policy, men would become followers of God. It would be
foolish not to follow God, if to follow Him meant that one would
automatically be protected from illness, death, and disappointments of
every kind. But this would defeat the real essence of religion. The
earnest and genuine offering of worshipful love and devotion to God
from man is a free response. If God offered immunity from suffering to
all those who followed Him, He would also rob them of the means of
developing the beauty and strength of character for which all should
strive in this lifetime. God does not promise His children that they
will be immune to all suffering and evil. But He does say, in Romans
8:28, "We know that to them that love God, all things work together for
good, even to them that are called according to his purpose."
Because Men Live Together {17}
The answers already given indicate that even when evil and
suffering come to those who are innocent, there may be the possibility
of great good within that suffering. Further explanation of why the
innocent suffer lies in the fact that men live together on this earth.
The apostle Paul wrote in Romans 14:7, "None of us liveth to himself,
and none dieth to himself." The nature of the universe is such that
when certain causes are put into operation, certain effects inevitably
follow. Sin, which is essentially rebellion against God, causes
suffering. When God decided that men should live together upon the
earth, it was inevitable that the innocent should suffer. It should be
remembered that living together also brings many of the most cherished
blessings that mankind knows. To live alone, and thereby miss the
sufferings that one sometimes must bear because of his connections
with other human beings, would be a price too great for most men to
pay. Most men, were they given the chance to make the choice, would
choose to cast their lot among their fellow men, accepting the sorrows
and suffering along with the joys and the blessings.
Look Up Toward Heaven
The Bible describes man's existence on earth as a temporary
sojourn through which man is preparing for a better and a more
permanent abode. The Bible says that Abraham "looked for the city
which hath the foundations whose builder and maker is God" (Hebrews
11:10). In the same chapter we read that Moses made his choice to live
and work among God's people rather than enjoy the pleasures of Egypt,
"for he looked unto the recompense of reward" (Hebrews 11:26). Paul
says, "Our citizenship is in heaven" (Philippians 3:20). He
emphasized,
"Wherefore we faint not; but though our outward man is
decaying, yet our inward man is renewed day by day. For our
light affliction which is for the moment, worketh for us more
and more exceedingly an eternal weight of glory....For we
know that if the earthly house of our tabernacle be dissolved
we have a building from God, a house not made with hands,
eternal, in the heavens" (II Corinthians 4:16-17; 5:1).
God has prepared for us a home and to that home He wishes us to
eventually make our way. Were it not for the heartaches,
disappointments, and sufferings of this world, we might forget the
greater destiny that lies before us.{18} Perhaps the suffering of
this world is designed in part to cause all of us not to be satisfied
here, but to lift our eyes toward a more wonderful world that is to
come. Beyond this life with its toils and tears, its struggles and
disappointments, lies a realm of pure delight of which John wrote, "He
shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death shall be no more;
neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain, any more"
(Revelation 21:4).
In the final analysis the Christian answer to evil and suffering is
found in the Savior. The Christian finds in Jesus Christ the guarantee
of God's love and of a life someday free from all evil. The Bible
says: (1) To be in Christ is to suffer (II Timothy 3:12); (2) To be in
Christ is to learn from suffering (Hebrews 12:5-11); (3) To be in
Christ is to rejoice in suffering (I Peter 4:13; Matthew 5:3-12); (4)
To be in Christ is to look beyond suffering (Romans 8:18); (5) To be in
Christ in the midst of an evil world, to cry "Abba, Father," and to
know that He hears and cares is sufficient for the one who is a child
of God. If it seems to the finite minds of men that God is going about
it all wrong, then we should remind such men of the God who possesses a
much more perfect wisdom than our own. We must trust Him, with whom we
all have to do, and live this life the way He would have us to live it.
And if we do not find every question answered to our complete
satisfaction here in th is life, let us rest in the assurance that such
questions `will' be answered in eternity.
ENDNOTES
{1} Lewis, C.S. "Divine Goodness." `IN: The Problem of Pain'.
MacMillan. New York. 1948. Chapter 3.
{2} Little, Paul E. `Know Why You Believe'. Scripture Press. Wheaton,
IL. 1976. pp 119-120. Cf: Baxter, Batsell Barrett. `I Believe
Because'. Baker Book House. Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1972. p 274
{3} `Ibid'. pp 127-128.
{4} This the thought presented by J.N. Findlay, "Can God's Existence
Be Disproved?" in `New Essays in Philosophical Theology'. Antony
Flew and Alasdair MacIntyre, Editors. S.C. M. Press. London.
1966. pp 47-56
{5} Little, Paul E. `op cit'
{6} cf., Cushman, Herbert E. `A Beginner's History of Philosophy'.
Vol. I. Houghton Mifflin Co. New York. 1946. pp 260-261. cf.,
also: Trueblood, D. Elton. `Philosophy of Religion'. Harper & Row.
New York. 1957. Chapter 17 ("The Problem of Evil").
{7} cf., Crawford, C.C. `Genesis'. Vol. II. College Press. Joplin,
Missouri. 1968. pp 3-4. cf6., also Trueblood, D. Elton.
`Philosophy of Religion'. Harper & Row. New York. 1957. Chapter
17 ("The Problem of Evil"). cf., also Geisler, Norman L.
`Philosophy of Religion'. Zondervan. Grand Rapids, Michigan.
1974. pp 311-312.
{8} Little, Paul E. `op cit'. p 156. cf., Crawford, C.C. `op cit'. pp
1,2; cf., Trueblood, D. Elton. `op cit'. pp 235,236.
{9} Brightman, Edgar S. `A Philosophy of Religion'. Prentice-Hall.
New York. 1946. cf., Trueblood, D. Elton. `op cit'. pp 240-243.
{10} cf., Carnell, Edward J. `A Philosophy of the Christian Religion'.
Eerdmans. Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1970. p 294. Dr. Carnell says
the concept of a finite God is a thought "...which Scripture
scores as untrue."
{11} Giesler, Norman L. `op cit'. pp 315,316. Dr. Geisler speaks of
this under the heading, "Impossibilism's Answer to Evil."
{12} Little, Paul E. `loc cit'.PG 385
{13} This is briefly discussed by Trueblood, `op cit'., pp 253,254,
under the heading, "Natural Evil."
{14} Baxter, Batsell Barrett. `I Believe Because'. Baker Book House.
Grand Rapids, MI. 1972. p 275.
{15} Geisler, Norman L. `op cit'. p 385.
{16} Trout, Virgil R. `Christian Evidences'. Sweet Publishing Co.
Austin, TX. 1963. p 80. cf. Crawford, C.C. `op cit'. p 6. cf.
also Geisler , Norman L. `op cit'. p 386. cf. also Ferguson,
Milton. "The Problem of Evil and Suffering." `IN: South western
Journal of Theology'. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Fort Worth, TX. 1963. p 16.
{17} Warren, Thomas B. `Have Atheists Proved There Is No God?' Gospel
Advocate. Nashville, TN. 1972. p 70ff. cf. Baxter, Batsell
Barrett. `op cit'. p 277.
{18} Baxter, Batsell Barrett. `op cit'. p 276.
This file may be copied, but is distributed on the understanding that
it will not be modified or edited, and will not be used for commercial
purposes. Further, it may not be copied without due reference to the
original publication source, author, year, and name and address of the
publisher.
Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Mongomery, AL 36117-2752
Downloaded from:
The Christian Connection of Palm Beach
300/1200/2400 bps
407/533/5216