The
Atkins Chronicle, October 22, 2008
Book
Review by Annielaura Jaggers
Margaret
Mahler: A Biography of the Psychoanalyst
Author:
Alma Halbert Bond
In an effort to persuade readers of the significance of the contents
of this book, Margaret Mahler: A biography of the Psychoanalyst, I
can think of no better way than to invite them to stretch their
imaginations to picture each of them possessing a preschool child
who was suffering from a tic that about every thirty minutes would
jerk the child's head to one side and cause him or her to emit a
disagreeable squawk. I ask, "Wouldn't you be happy to know
that there were qualified, licensed therapists who could cure the
ailment?"
I can assure any reader of this work that he or she will learn much
about the topic of psychoanalysis for children. Alma Bond has
placed the subject matter squarely in the history of the last
hundred years and by means of full interviews she conducted, she has
given ample evidence of its importance to other psychoanalysts as
well as clients. When Bond acknowledges and thanks various
sources, she lists forty persons whom she interviewed which, she
admits, reads like a "who's who in psychoanalysis," friends and
colleagues of Mahler. This section also lists the number and
location of the archives researched and related works
read.
A number of photographs, an adequate glossary, chapter notes and
bibliography, and an index all complete the thoroughness of Bond's
biography.
Bond relates the geographical setting of Mahler's life. She
was born in Sopron, a small town near Budapest, Hungary, to a Jewish
family. She perceived that her mother loved her little sister
Suzannah more than her, a fact that caused her to give her love to
her father, Dr. Gustav M. Schoenberger, thus developing an Oedipus
complex. He did not reciprocate more than being proud of her
mind and encouraging her to develop it by emphasizing excellence in
math and science.
Mahler's first six years of schooling were in Sopron, but despite
there being four high schools there, girls were not admitted.
Even though she was only fourteen years old, her parents allowed her
to go to Budapest to live with her Aunt Irma and enter high school
there. Neither Margaret nor Aunt Irma liked one another, and
she was allowed to spend much time in the home of her good friend,
Alice, whose mother was Vilma Kovacs who welcomed Margaret almost as
another child.
Margaret is to say later, "I am more and more aware that my Budapest
time was by far the most important influence for my later
professional life." Vilma Kovacs welcomed any number of lay
psychoanalysts into her living room resulting in a sort of
salon. Margaret and Alice were allowed to attend and each was
inspired to become psychoanalysts as were the adults. They met
some important persons other than the student psychoanalysts, for
instance, Geza Roheim, a famous anthropologist, and the artist
Robert Bereny who became famous for his caricatures of
psychoanalysts in that early period.
The girls met Sandor Ferenczi who
encouraged them to read Freud. Alice purloined her mother's
copy of Ferenczi's essay which he wrote to deliver when he was
invited to speak at Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts; its
topic, Freud's Analytic theory. They read it secretly under their
desks. These 15-year-old girls procured another of mother's
forbidden papers to read "under the bench." It was Freud's
"Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality." They devoured this
material like hungry puppies. Margaret said of this period,
"We dwelt among the Titans."
After graduating from High school,
Mahler enrolled in the University of Budapest to study art, but soon
found that she didn't have the talent or the interest. She
wanted to become a medical doctor, but for some reason thought her
father would not like it, but because of her experience in the art
department, she decided to tell him, and much to her surprise, he
approved her studying medicine. She and Suzannah moved to
Munich. It took some insistence for her to be admitted because
she was Jewish, but the admitting officer was impressed with her
demeanor and academic record, so he admitted her in the midst of the
term.
Margaret was talented in exploring and
learning of the best teachers. She found that Professor
Meinhard von Pfaundler was one of the leading pediatricians of the
times and was the director of the Munich University Clinic.
She applied for a position in his clinic and was appointed as a
co-Assistentin in the children's clinic. She ended up working
with Dr. Rudolph von Degkwitz in his pioneering work in developing a
serum to prevent measles. It was Margaret's first experience
in research and she was marked for life with a fascination for
it.
By this time the anti-Semitism had
intensified to the point that Margaret knew she would have to leave
Munich. She chose the university at Jena and had to call on
officials of the Weimar Republic to sponsor her. She was
harassed because of this help and other similar incidents; however,
she prevailed and became a doctor. Dr. Jussuf Abrahim who was
the foremost child neurologist of the day sponsored her
graduation.
After finishing her work at Jena, she
studied at Heidelberg for two semesters, but it was a stressful
period for her because she had severe reoccurring abdominal pain
because of a poorly performed appendectomy in her early teens.
She finally had the needed surgery and learned that extreme
adhesions were causing the pain.
At Heidelberg she had a repeat of
participating in a salon similar to the one she had enjoyed in the
home of Vilma Kovacs. Friedrich Gundolph, a poet, and Dr. Emil
Lederer, a professor of economics, held open house regularly.
Here she met a number of people prominent in their respective
fields, for example, Karl Jaspers, philosopher, who did pioneering
work in psychopathology, Max Weber, sociologist, Karl Manheim,
famous scientist, and his wife, Julia, who was from Hungary and
later became a psychoanalyst. Margaret was always welcome; she
read every book that would render her conversant in their deep and
broad discussions.
Margaret Mahler graduated in 1922 with
honors, and in applying for her license to practice medicine, she
turned from pediatrics to psychiatry, and entered the required
training analysis with Helene Deutsch, who had had Freud as her
analyst. (One's status in the community of psychoanalysts was highly
influenced by the identity of one's analyst.) Mahler adored
Helene, but Helene eventually dismissed Mahler, a fact that pained
Mahler all her life. Alma Bond thinks that Helene handled the
dismissal badly and attributes it to the fact that they were too
much alike.
Mahler procured work as doctors'
helper working with children, and was often recruited into other
research. Some of her experiences contributed and some
detracted from her goal, but finally after seven years of hard work
and persistence, Mahler was accepted as an analyst.
During this period as doctors' helper,
she was associated with many children's clinics that gave
opportunities to learn and took her closer to forming and supporting
her own ideas about children's development which became the core of
her contribution to the knowledge of the psychoanalysis of
children.
She worked with Dr. Clemens Van
Pirquet, a baron, handsome and capable of listening to Margaret, but
not hearing her. In Vienna, he ran a school for problem
children that included some child psychiatry, but that Margaret
regarded as primitive. Her next work was also in Vienna, at
the Moll Well Baby Clinic or the Mothers' Advice Clinic. Here
Margaret received reinforcement for her ideas about the importance
of the mother-baby relationship.
She was qualified to practice
pediatrics so started building a clientele, but wanted to move her
career toward psychiatry, so she enrolled as an extern at Steinhof,
a state institution connected to the University Psychiatry
Clinic. She also worked as a health and welfare physician in
the school system of Vienna and eventually headed a well baby
clinic. This employment by the city brought her in contact
with August Aichhorn, author of the famous book, Wayward Youth, on
the topic of juvenal delinquency. Despite the advice of
Ferenczi and the Vienna Psychoanalytic Institute, she asked him to
become her analyst in training. He was attracted to her and
readily agreed. They immediately became
lovers.
He had developed a rare technique for
treating both boys and girls and got unusually impressive
results. Mahler watched him work and considered him one of her
greatest teachers even though their relationship merely intensified
her oedipal complex. They both realized that she needed a more
objective analysis and settled on the plan of asking Willi Hoffer to
take over. She stayed in analysis with him about four
years.
He did not cure her of all her
idiosyncrasies---for example, bad temper, paranoia, depression and
the like---but he did remove enough of her avoidance of men that she
accepted the courtship of Dr. Paul Mahler, a chemist. She was
thirty-nine years of age. Her father had discouraged her from
accepting the interest of any young men, telling her she had no need
of marriage. Willi Hoffer gave her permission to
marry.
It soon became clear that Paul Mahler was not able to pay his
way. He belonged to a family business that was doing badly,
and he actually used money that Margaret made to put into it.
He became a son to be cared for rather than a husband. They
eventually divorced; however, Bond sees her as having genuine
affection for him because she saved his ashes and had them buried
with her.
During this period, Hitler came into
power, invaded Austria, and started his horrible program of killing
or sterilization of inferiors. Jews were judged inferior,
meaning that he sought the elimination of all Jews. She was no
longer able to communicate with her parents or Suzannah. She
later learned that her father had died before the aunschloss, but
that her mother and several cousins and many friends were among the
26,000 Jews who were arrested and consigned to Auschwich.
Margaret would never say that her mother died, rather that she was
murdered by the Nazis. She and Paul were marked with a "J."
Life became so difficult she knew they would have to
leave.
She knew that she and her husband
should get affidavits from Nazi Germany but were not able to.
She had acquired a fair number of analysands, and among them was the
niece of Lady Leontine Sassoon, the widow of the viceroy of
India. Margaret asked her to send a letter to the Viennese
Home Office of the British Embassy informing them that she would
like the Mahlers to be allowed to go to Great Britain as her guests
while making arrangements to go to the United States.
Permission was given, and they left in 1938.
In London they were guests of the
British Psychoanalytic Society who paid for their room and board in
a house in Greencroft Gardens. The society took the
responsibility of reassigning them and chose the United
States. After five months, they went to New York. While
in London, Paul was not able to find any work, but Margaret was able
to establish a small group of students so that they were not totally
dependent on the Society. One of them, a little boy, saw her
grappling with English language so decided to teach it to her.
She said of him that he was her first competent English
teacher. The Mahlers had a pleasant time in London because a
number of psychoanalyst friends from Europe were also
there.
Dr. Ernst Jones, biographer of Freud,
was one of them. So that they would not be curtailed in
getting established upon arriving in America, he saw that they had
enough money. The demands of adjusting to her new country brought
out and crystallized the sum of Margaret's body of knowledge into an
original compendium of published work.
Despite her heavy Viennese accent,
Margaret studied hard and passed all the tests needed to be awarded
her license to practice medicine and psychoanalysis in New
York. She wrote an original paper, "Pseudoimbecility: A magic
Cap of Invisibility," and the success of it marked her acceptance in
the New York Analytic Society and was eventually published in the
"The Psychoanalytic Quarterly."
Alma Bond was able to say with
confidence that Mahler was on a roll.
Mahler was finally at a point in her
life when she was able to believe with confidence that she could do
research. She became acquainted with Dr. Benjamin Spock, who
was also a pediatrician and psychoanalyst. He introduced her
to Caroline Zachary, head of the Bureau of Child Guidance, who
invited her to give some lectures there. This yielded her a
number of clients. She was invited to head the outpatient
department of children services of the New York Psychiatric
Institute.
Another great windfall was that Dr.
Nolan Lewis, Chairman of the Columbia University Psychiatry
Department, told Mahler that Dr. Reginald Lurie had been called into
military service which resulted in his not being able to
utilize the grant money furnished by the Masonic Scottish Rights
Funds; therefore, she could have access to it for a project of her
choosing.
She chose to continue work on her tic
studies. She with co-workers, Sam Ritvo, Irma Doiss, Jean Luke, and
W. Daltroff, published papers a number of which are considered
classics today.
Alma Bond carefully describes Mahler's
continued success in research and publication and the special work
with Dr. Manuel Furer at the Albert Einstein College of
Medicine. They worked together on a treatment program called
Symbiotic Child Psychosis. Furer was testament to many facets
of Mahler's Personality. A number of publications were
produced. A grant was received, but unbelievably turned down
by Mahler because she would have to give several hours to the
department in addition to what her research required. They finally
received one which supported the establishment of the Masters'
Children Center.
The biographer, Alma Bond, introduces
herself and explains her position as observer for Margaret Mahler in
Chapter 12. Mahler was working and researching at the Master's
Children Center with an arrangement of employing what she called
"participant observers," young students of psychoanalysis who would
observe well mothers and babies and make notes a certain amount of
time each week. Alma, having become acquainted with Mahler's
work through her writings, thought of no better experience than to
become one of those "participant observers." She applied for
the job and got it. She relates the pertinent facts of that
direct experience with Mahler.
Bond describes her first interview
with Mahler and the friendly relationship they developed fairly
rapidly. Mahler described to Bond her duties as a "participant
observer" and read Bond's reports showing interest in Bond's
response to her observations. In a fairly short time Mahler
put Bond on the payroll. On a more personal level Mahler would
invite Bond to go walking with her, to lunch with her, and would
give her rides in her car. Altogether, she gave the impression
that she liked and admired Bond.
Bond explained another experience
because she thought it shed light on the work there at the center,
revealing much about the psyches of herself, Mahler's, and a child,
Hilary, who was attracted to Bond and formed an attachment to her as
well as her attachment to her own mother. Hilary's development
followed Mahler's pattern of child development quite closely and led
to Mahler's abrupt termination of her relationship with Bond.
She describes this in great detail.
No child psychoanalysts existed until
Margaret Mahler developed the idea of a psychoanalytic method of
treatment for children, even babies. She was the first
advocate to do so. Freud himself felt that one had to be an
adult to profit from psychoanalysis.
Margaret Mahler based her theories on
her own experiences; however, she was far too thoroughly scientific
to allow that to suffice. She studied thousands of mother-baby
relationships before claiming objectivity.
Alma Bond was one of the many people
who furnished Mahler with many hours of objective data. Bond
was pleased with her relationship with Mahler until the day she
realized that it had come to an end. Margaret had expressed
interest in Alma Bond's husband's acting career so that when his
play, "The Big Man," opened, Alma sent Margaret copies of favorable
reviews and tried to call her to make arrangements for them to
attend together. It was as if a wall had been constructed
around the great lady. Bond could not get through to
her.
It was a painful realization to Alma
that despite what she felt to be the beginning of a warm trusting,
relationship, it was not so. Bond said, "The truth is that she
dropped me like the iron that had scarred her sister's cheek. . . I
did not understand. . . Couldn't she have explained to me?"
She continues. "I, like Hilary and Mahler herself, had been
weaned traumatically. . . In terms of healing the repetition
compulsion, I had to relive my infantile symbiosis and have it end
differently, so I could overcome the ill effects of the trauma and
pick up and go on with my development. . . Such was the
therapeutic genius of Margaret Mahler. It seems that our
relationship, painful as it was for me, was a therapeutic
symbiosis. Although her 'technique' was a bit drastic, it
turned out to be a 'cure.' I suppose I should be
grateful. She saved me a lot of
analysis."
But before Mahler could adequately
announce and support her theories, she had to experience two more
situations. The first was the inevitable divorce from Gustave
Mahler. They were completely incompatible. He never
earned enough money to pay his way, and it was impossible for him to
discard his beliefs in the traditional male-female roles in
marriage. He would not perform any household duties; he wanted
financial settlement declaring that despite the fact that he did not
contribute to the purchase of their homes, he had worked on
them. She finally agreed to pay him $300 a month and divorce
was finally achieved in 1953. When he died, Margaret acquired
his ashes in a bronze container and had them buried beside the place
where she would be buried. The second was dealing with the
offer from the Philadelphia Analytic School to come and teach.
Both situations were very strenuous.
She suffered from having an oedipal
complex which she attributed to her experience of being extremely
jealous of her baby sister Suzannah. (Margaret Mahler was born to
Eugenia Weiner Schoenberger, a nineteen-year-old young woman,
exactly 9 months and ten days after her wedding day. Eugenia
regarded herself as too young for motherhood so rejected baby
Margaret and had as little to do with her as
possible.)
When Suzannah was born four years
later, her mother welcomed her and gave her much love and
affection. Little Margaret observed Suzannah feeding at her
mother's breast and was overwhelmed with jealousy despite that she
had turned to her father for love and enjoyed the fantasy that she
had been born from his head as had Athena, the Greek goddess of
wisdom and orderly battalions, been born from the head of her
father, Zeus, the king of the gods. Mahler's relationship with her
father was satisfying; however, it never made up for the longing she
had for the love and approval of her mother.
It was acknowledging to herself that
she was an excellent teacher, as well as being a successful
practitioner, that gave her the courage to publicize her theories
which were more and more being sought after.
The Philadelphia School invited
Margaret to be in charge of its department of Child Analysis.
She accepted and in this capacity, she designed and implemented one
of the great programs for child care. However, she was
unwilling to leave her clientele in New York City and the work at
the Masters Children's Center.
Thus began an extremely physically
stressful period of Mahler's life. She travelled to
Philadelphia from New York City and worked full weekend days and
nights packed with classes and consultations then returned to the
city to begin a full week's work there. Out of these strenuous
years came the establishment of her knowledge of child development
based on the phases of separation-individuation fully described and
illustrated by telling of the child's
behavior.
Other results from the research and
experience were contributive: one, some excellent teaching methods
later adopted by many psychoanalytic training schools; two, the
dispelling of the prevalent attitude that the behavior of mothers
was the cause of autism and other serious problems in a child's
development; three, the gathering of a compendium of guidelines for
the use of mothers and fathers.
The establishment of the Margaret
Mahler Foundation came along in this period. Many leaders of rich
foundations were looking for innovative personalities in whom they
could finance with confidence. Another result was the
publication of a valuable book, On Human Symbiosis and the
Vicissitudes of Individuation: Infantile Psychosis, a book which
affected psychoanalysis permanently.
Mahler's advice to new mothers
contained this profound idea, "There is no point in the life cycle
that constructive intervention would not be feasible and
useful. We are never quite ready. Development goes
on from the cradle to the grave."
Mahler became the great researcher and
teacher she had always wished to be despite her unhappy childhood
and adult experience with Hitler's Holocaust. But her greatest
ambition was to be the infant partner in a relationship of dual
unity (where two, mother and infant, become one). This was of
course impossible for her or anybody to achieve. Mahler's
ability to sublimate these conflicting themes in her life brought
her quite close to being an integrated human
being.
Bond tells of attending a party that
was given by Mahler's personal secretary when she retired from
having worked for Mahler for twenty-five years. About twenty
women were invited all of whom had worked with Mahler. If
Mahler was invited, she did not attend so it ended with these women
sitting around telling Mahler stories. All had experienced
some traumatic event with her; nevertheless, each of them saw and
related positive traits in her personality.
They all were able to ask themselves
why they stayed with the various lengths of time and concluded that
they were able to see the value of her work. Bond names and
quotes these people. Bond also interviews other
colleagues. All of them speculate on what might be the reasons
for Mahler's chaotic and intemperate behavior and they come up with
various positions. One asserts that is a common trait of
Hungarians, another thinks it comes from the anger engendered by her
mother's murder. Another attributes it to her Acquired
Situational Narcissism. And there were many other theories all
related to low self-esteem.
Alma Bond prepares to conclude the
biography by devoting a final chapter to more testimonies of
Mahler's friends and fellow psychoanalysts: those who love and
respect her and those who thoroughly despised her. Another sad
chapter is about her last days and her death in the Lenox Hill
Hospital on September 27, 1985, on the same day that Hurricane
Gloria slammed into Long Island outside New York City. It was
an intense, violent storm, the 16th worst on record in the United
States to that date. Only one friend was with her.
Others had tried to get to her bedside, but could not on
account of the hurricane.
"The Mysterious will of Margaret
Mahler," the next-to-last chapter, was devoted to her will which was
truly a puzzle. Many of her colleagues were disappointed,
particularly those who had expected her to donate to various
enterprises that would enhance their profession. Instead, she
left the most of her wealth to the Gray Panthers. The reason for
that was a matter of speculation. She did appreciate their
work. The Foundation bearing her name thought they would get
some of her money, but some thought she didn't want her work there
to go forward without her. She left a considerable amount to
the cemetery maintenance in Sopron, Hungary, the location of her
father's, her husband's and her graves, and any number of smaller
behests.
Bond's final chapter is entitled
"Margaret Mahler today." In it she interviews several of
Mahler's critics. She concludes with stating the question so
where does the work of Margaret Mahler stand in the hierarchy of
psychoanalytic thinking?
The consensus is that her
contributions, like those of Freud, are on a slippery slope.
The jury is still out on which of the theories will, if ever, become
permanent."
But Bond says that all interviewed for
this final chapter, say that whether or not her theories are in
vogue or not, all concede she was a great pioneer who with little or
much help changed the practice of child psychology now and into the
future.
My personal opinion is that Bond has
neglected no significant information about the life of Mahler unless
you wanted to know what brand of toothpaste she used. She
included information about all phases of maintaining her health, the
stresses in doing so, even including her sex life. Mahler was
not an activist in politics, but Bond shows how the political life
of Europe affected her and her family. Much is told about her
aesthetic leanings and what superior taste she shows in her choices
of works of art. Her attitude toward religious faith was godly as
were her notions of true wisdom.
Bond has this to say finally:
"Margaret Mahler's persona was like a stained glass window which is
made up of shards and chinks. The fragments are precariously
soldered together, but have no real connection with each
other. Odd that such disparate pieces could result in a
creation of beauty. Odd, too, that the essences of Margaret
Mahler, like a stained glass window, evolved into a work of
art. It reminds one of Thomas Wolf's remarks: "a beautiful
disease of nature, like a pearl in an oyster."
|