To: AZRKBA@asu.edu 
Subject: Re: prop 200 - it aint a drivers license - its an internal passport 
From: Tombstone Tumbleweed <tootough@QUIK.COM>  Add to Contacts  
Date: Tue, Sep 7 2004 6:14:26 PM -0700 
 View Message Source  

-----Original Message-----
From: Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Arizona [mailto:AZRKBA@asu.edu]On
Behalf Of Tim Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:05 PM
To: AZRKBA@asu.edu
Subject: Re: prop 200 - it aint a drivers license - its an internal
passport
This was the official press release from the state that slipped through
under the radar a few weeks ago.
Chris Simcox


NEW ARIZONA LAW AMENDS MVD DRIVER LICENSE ID REQUIREMENTS LIST
A new Arizona law, effective August 25, 204, has resulted in an update of
the Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (MVD)
driver license identification requirements list.
SB 1232, passed during the 2004 Legislative session, provides, under A.R.S.
 28-3153 that MVD shall no longer accept as a primary proof of
identification, a driver license from a state that does not require proof of
lawful presence in the United States under federal law for issuing a driver
license.
The new law will have an impact on some new residents to the state who apply
for either an Arizona driver license or non-operating identification card,
and who wish to use a driver license from certain states as a primary proof
of identification.
According to the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
(AAMVA), the international association of driver licensing agencies, there
are nineteen states that do not currently have a lawful presence
requirement.
Those states are: Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri,
Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.