| |
From our friends at IDDT ( http://www.iddtinternational.org/iddt.html ),
here are the symptoms they collected on the problems with
the use of synthetics, excepting weight gain, I have
personally experienced ALL of these problems on all
synthetics AND on pork, we need all species and types of
insulin (even the Genetically Engineered ones which may
cause cancer in some of us):
* [ All of these are
listed symptoms of hypoglycemia since the change in symptom lists needed
to prove human safe vs. pork back in 1990-92, see change ed]
- 24% -
told us that their doctor was unwilling or reluctant
to change their insulin to natural animal insulin
- 8% -
wanted more information
- 3% - told us their doctor did
not listen, ‘it’s all in the mind’
Of equal concern,
we frequently received the following comments:
- ‘I didn’t know there was
such a thing as animal insulin.’
- ‘I was never told there were
alternatives.’
- ‘I didn’t realise ‘human’
insulin was not derived from human beings.’
FACTS
-
No large
scale, long-term trials comparing ‘human’ and
animal insulins have ever been carried out.
-
The first
research in 1980 using ‘human’ insulin, by
Professor Harry Keen, involved 17 healthy
non-diabetic men and in 1982 ‘human’ insulin was
given a licence for general use. This is a
remarkably short time for a new drug, especially as
‘human’ insulin was the first ever genetically
engineered drug to be used on people.
-
The
research that has been carried out has largely been
in the laboratory situation and/or using small
numbers of people, so the relevance of this research
is questionable.
-
There is no
evidence to show that synthetic ‘human’ insulin
has any advantages over natural animal insulins.
-
‘Human’
insulin has been shown to be more aggressive with a
faster action and a higher peak of action than the
equivalent porcine or bovine insulins.
An
additional FACT is the work of Sotos Raptis in 1980,
published in 1981. Click here for
details.
|