fieldfare-guru
Films Reviews - H
Home
Gallery Reviews
Book Reviews
Film Reviews
Album Reviews
Top Albums Poll
Gig Reviews
Ipod Statistics

Hard Day's Night
***¼
The Beatles' first film. Considered quite a period piece comic classic, I found the film and its humour very dated. Still the songs are great and one thing HDN does illustrate is the importance of Ringo as the loveable soul of the group. Sure, he wasn't as musically talented as the others but The Beatles wouldn't have been the unit they were without Starr's non-egotistical charm.
Released - 1964
Seen by me: 4.5.03

Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets
***¾
The second film in the Harry Potter series is darker, more action-packed and less whimsical than the Philosopher's Stone - a shame for me as I prefer the films' more whimsical, Dickens-without-the-brutality qualities. An incredible visual spectacle with fantastic effects, Chamber of Secrets is still very imaginative with some strong performances and again sticks very closely to the original story (arguably too closely given that the film is 160 minutes long!). Kenneth Branagh is excellently cast as the very vain new teacher Gilderoy Lockhart and is good though not quite as gloriously over the top as I had read to believe. An excellent film which is very much worth seeing - especially at the cinema.
Released - 2002
Seen by me: 15.12.02 (with Anne)

Harry Potter & The Goblet Of Fire
****
Film version of the 4th Potter book where Harry is unwittingly entered into the Tri-Wizard Tournament.  Sensibly the Goblet Of Fire film concentrates on the tournament rather than the other sub-plots in the book though there is still some room for lightness and humour amongst the darkness of the main story. 
The effects are of course brilliant and Goblet Of Fire another excellent adaptation though Prisoner Of Azkaban is the pick of the bunch for me so far.
Released:  2005
Seen by me:  27.11.05 (with Naomi)

Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix
****

Fifth film in the Potter series which, like most of its predecessors, is a good action movie with some fantastic effects but is not particularly memorable or thought provoking afterwards.  Imelda Staunton is superb as the hideous Delores Umbridge, a Ministry-chosen teacher brought in to lead Hogawarts as the powers that be show wariness of the intentions of Dumbledore. 
As has increasingly been the case with the Potter films, it would be very difficult to follow Phoenix if you hadn’t read the book.  Still well worth seeing for Potter fans everywhere.
Released:  2007
Seen by me:  1.8.07 (with Amy)

Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone - 1st Viewing
****
A thankfully very British film adaptation of the first Harry Potter book with some superb casting and predictably brilliant special effects. The first 45 minutes are magical and enchanting - Dickensian without the brutality. The rest of the film doesn't quite live up to this magical beginning but is still really worth watching.
Released - 2001
Seen by me: 5.2.02 (with Sam)

Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone - 2nd Viewing
****¼
Even better and more enchanting on its second viewing in more comfortable surroundings. Especially notable this time are the fine acting performances - particularly Richard Harris as Dumbledore and Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid. A brilliantly made, Dickensian adventure film.
Released - 2001
Seen by me:  27.12.02 (at home with Mum)

Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban
****1/2
The third film in the Harry Potter series is the first one made by a new director, Alfonso Cuaron.  Unlike the previous two films, he doesn't include practically every scene in the book but still presents a cohesive and entertaining film which does justice to its parent novel.  This change in approach is very successful as it breathes new life into a series which was in danger of showing diminishing returns and prevents the film from being very long.  The acting is excellent throughout with Michael Gambon moving effortlessly into Richard Harris' shoes as Dumbledore. Among the "newcomers", David Thewlis is also particularly good as Professor Lupin. The Prisoner of Azkaban is a superb film - probably the best in the Harry Potter series so far.
Released:  2004
Seen by me: 11.6.04 (with Naomi and Amy)

History Boys
****

History Boys is a film adaptation of an Alan Bennett play about eight boys spending an extra term at school for their Oxbridge exams in the early 80s.  It stars the same young men who have successfully played the boys on stage over the last couple of years as well as fine performances by Richard Griffiths, Frances De La Tour, Clive Merrison and Stephen Campbell Moore.  The boys start their term being taught by the eccentric, camp academic Hector (Griffiths) though the dour, practical headmaster (Merrison) replaces some of his lessons with rookie recruit Irwin (Moore) to give the boys some edge and help them think outside the box.  The contrast, conflict and respect between the two generations is cleverly portrayed, as is the gradual development of the individual personalities of the eight students.
All well written and beautifully developed then yet nothing like my secondary education even though the boys are only supposed to be a handful of years older than me.  The undercurrent of homosexuality, ubiquitous use of surnames and flamboyant flouting of academic prowess were not part of my school experience though maybe these facets were more prevalent in single sex Grammar Schools a few years earlier.
Although The History Boys was written as a play and is probably most effective on stage, the film adaptation is memorable and thought-provoking with some fine dialogue and excellent performances.  Well worth seeing.
Released:  2006
Seen by me:  14.10.06 (with Naomi)

Hitch
***

Comedy starring Will Smith as a "date doctor” which looks a little into the issues and politics of the dating game. 
Hitch was not particularly memorable afterwards and not really my sort of film though I’m sure it’s fine within its genre of commercialised modern comedies.
Released:  2005 
Seen by me:  15.4.06 (with Naomi)

Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy
***

Disappointing version of Douglas Adams’ famous book though it was always destined to be an anti-climax for most people in their mid 30s upwards.  The trouble is that we all grew up with the cult radio and TV versions in the early 80s and though the film tries hard, Hitchhikers was always essentially a very British period piece.  Furthermore I’m afraid that Martin Freeman is not versatile enough to play the human “everyman” Arthur Dent though the other lead characters – Mos Def as Ford Prefect, Sam Rockwell as Zaphod Beeblebrox and Zooey Deschanel as Trillian are good.  Hitchhikers has an interesting new ending and is worth seeing for those who haven’t seen it before.  Prepare for disappointment if you have though…
Released:  2005
Seen by me:  21.5.05 (with Naomi, Tracy and Nick)

Hot Fuzz
****

Fast moving comedy by the team which brought us Shaun Of The Dead, Hot Fuzz stars Simon Pegg as an ambitious policeman unwittingly transferred from London to a weird small town in the West Country.  It is a funny and clever post-modern comedy yet one, perhaps tellingly, which I cannot remember much about when I finally got round to writing this review several months later…
Released:  2007
Seen by me:  13.10.07 – with Naomi

Hours, The
****½
Brilliantly made and acted film which cuts between a day in the life of 3 women all connected by Virginia Woolf's novel "Mrs Dalloway". The 3 leading actors are superb - Nicole Kidman as the disturbed, withdrawn Woolf writing the novel in the 1930s (I believe - apologies if dates are not 100% accurate), Julianne Moore as an unhappy, suburban housewife reading the book in the early 1950s and Meryl Streep as a modern Mrs Dalloway in the late 90s. A brilliant film but depressing and disturbing with recurring themes of insanity, suicide and (in the first 2 cases above) repressed lesbianism. A brilliantly made, thought provoking, highbrow film.
Released - 2003
Seen by me: 23.3.03 (with Anne)

Hunger Games, The
****
The Hunger Games is a film adaptation of the first in a series of novels by Suzanne Collins which are particularly popular with teenagers. Set in a dystopian future, it tells of an annual event begun to keep the populace under control after a failed revolution. Each region picks a teenage boy and girl to train up, face the media, then enter a vast wooded area where they fight and survive till there's only one left. The organisers also introduce gruesome predators to test the contestants as an enraptured population looks on. But this year, the determined pairing from the District 12 region make it different...
The Hunger Games is a well-made atmospheric adaptation of a far-reaching imaginative novel. A clear futuristic, totalitarian satire of Big Brother and similar shows, it is well edited, exciting and thought provoking...and well worth seeing.
Seen by me: 15.6.13 (with Naomi)

Enter supporting content here