"A PRODUCTIVE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW BEGINNING:
THE ORGANIC BANANA"
By Javier Bogantes of the Fundación Güilombé
Bananas have been a desired
fruit since pre-colonial and during post-colonial periods. Both colonizers and
colonized became interested in this tasty and nutritious fruit. For the
indigenous populations of the tropical regions, it became an essential source
of nutrition, both for them and for their animals; they cultivated it in their
gardens in the midst of forests and they celebrated it in their fiestas
processed as fermented "chicha". Colonizers and neo-colonizers were
always interested in the commerce of this fruit; they brought and took diverse
varieties from far away places. Bananas were understood as a business that
reached the most aberrant and absurd situation in the enormous plantations
established at the end of the last century by diverse North American companies.
The banana monocultures were
established in several countries of Latin America in regions inhabited by
indigenous communities. Continuing with the policies of extermination employed
against the indigenous communities of North America, the banana neocolonialists
confronted these cultures. Supported by the governments of the time, they
violated all the possible forms of tranquility of these peoples, finally
forcing them to flee from their land.
When the monocultures were
established, the biodiversity and natural wealth of these regions disappeared.
The enormous extensions of plantations became sources of contamination and
social conflict. If it is true that the establishment of these production
systems implied a considerable influx of currency and the creation of jobs, it
is not possible to measure the environmental and social costs that the invasion
of transnational banana companies caused these banana producing countries.
What can be affirmed is that
when one walks through any of these regions of Ecuador, Colombia or Costa Rica,
one finds a poor and depressing environment, social and environmental
deterioration, in those places where these monocultures have been established.
In regions such as Apartado or Uraba in Colombia, Bocas de Toro in Panama, or
in Valle de la Estrella in Costa Rica, one senses this depressed environment.
When one looks with a
conscience or with common sense, it is not necessary to carry out too many
scientific studies to verify something that is evident: that the attack of
agrotoxins which must be applied to these extensions of monocultures is
unsustainable. The effects on the watersheds and the deterioration of the soils
allow us to understand the disastrous alteration of the ecosystems where these
companies have established themselves.
The knowledge of the behavior
of Nature as a system, where all the diverse ecosystems are integrated permits
us to deduce that these sources of contamination, these great banana
plantations, can be affecting the surrounding ecosystems, among which the most
affected are the aquatic ecosystems.
In order to verify this,
sometimes it is only necessary to converse with children, who tend to tell us
stories of dead fish in the streams, shrimp that disappeared or strange odors
in some of the pools where they can no longer bathe.
The Earth: a living and
sacred being
Organic farming has become a
fad. Within a short time politicians and opportunists began to use the
discourse, without understanding its implications and principles. A false
organic world is worse than a conventional one, because the problem of the
corruption of these saving concepts is that all hope is lost regarding the possibility
of changing our relationship with Nature.
It is not exaggerated to say
that organic farming is indispensable in order to achieve planetary
sustainability. This is not only a technical agricultural system, but rather,
it implies a transformation of the values that have prevailed regarding the
relations among humans, and between these and Nature. In principle, it is
necessary to change the attitude which considers that all other beings are
there to be used at one’s will to satisfy one’s needs and greed. In this sense,
we can comprehend the respect for the biodiversity of species and of cultures.
It is necessary to reach a clear comprehension of the indigenous cosmological
thoughts, based on the fundamental principle that the earth is a living and
sacred being. This principle, in its technical application, will lead us to
implement methods to avoid erosion, desertification and the sterility of the
soil caused by over exploitation. If this change in attitude regarding the
relation of human to the earth would extend to diverse labor and economic
interrelations, it would be very possible to achieve not only a transformation
in agriculture, but also one in urban settings, in all the aspects of
infrastructure, and in the exploitation of mining resources.
Another principle related to
the transformation of this anthropocentric conception, is that of fraternity. A
change in attitude, to relate to Nature and the rest of living beings in a
respectful and selfish fashion, can apply to intergenerational relationships,
those between genders, and with all people we relate to. For this reason is has
been stated that it is of little use if organic farming is applied as an
innovative technique, but with a conventional mentality. It would be, to
paraphrase Erich Fromm, a correct means in the hands of incorrect persons.
An element of great
importance is, likewise, the concept of system, the understanding of the web
that unites us in Nature, and the links that join the ecosystems. The
understanding of these links strengthens our responsibility as actors in a
system where everything is subtly related. It is in this sense that the
application of a philosophy of the organic should not in any way promote a
isolating process.
"The models "of
resistance"
Traditional agriculture comprehends
the interrelations between the autochthonous cultures and Nature, among. The
cultivation techniques, nutrition, cosmo-vision and beliefs. Magical knowledge
is that which guides the activities of human beings with agriculture, hunting
and health in many regions of the planet. This knowledge comes from the
interaction with, and the profound observation of Nature.
Traditional agriculture
practiced by indigenous cultures, undoubtedly maintained sustainable styles of
production and life ways until they were subjugated and forced to flee,
assuming then life ways of resistance. They had to, in many cases, flee to the
mountains which were not apt for agriculture, and renounce farming when
confronted by enormous difficulties.
That economy and agriculture
of resistance continues to be practiced in many regions of Latin America. In
Costa Rica, the indigenous cultures and some peasant and Afro-Caribbean
communities continue applying these models of resistance. In the indigenous
case, particularly among the Bribris, one should not forget two fundamental
aspects: the first is that at the turn of the century they were forced to leave
the valleys and retreat into the mountains. Even though later on they recovered
their land when the banana companies pulled out, the degradation of the
ecosystems was enormous. The process of recovery was exemplary, but still the
Valley of Talamanca is extremely altered.
The other aspect is that this
population, and all the indigenous populations in general, live in demarcated
territories, which with a growing population, are no longer sufficient. From an
ecological point of view, and in relation to traditional cultivation
techniques, problems begin to arise. For example, the traditional practice of
slash and burn works well when land can be left to recover up to seven years,
depending on the specific conditions. Currently, there are families with many
children and very little land who cannot wait so long to finish the cycle of
leaving the land to rest. This begins to have deleterious effects such as
erosion, sedimentation of rivers and a diminished soil fertility.
In such situations, organic
farming can offer valuable possibilities, from a technical agricultural point
of view, as well as from an economic and political perspective, because the
perspective which the conventional system immediately offers is the package of
agrotoxic inputs to counteract these problems. Likewise, plantation agriculture
is proposed and conventional commerce, in which the farmers remain dependent on
technicians, sellers of poison, and intermediaries. This has already occurred
in Talamanca with plantains; in some regions these dangerous solutions have
already been introduced.
Organic farming offers more
integral solutions, from which the priority is the recovery of soils by means
of terraces against erosion, live barriers, the use of legumes, green manure,
diversification of crops and the use of fertilizers produced in the
communities, as well as other techniques.
A successful and risky
experience
Under the conditions
presented in this article, the Fundacion Guilombe initiated a process of
agroecological recovery of banana plantations. This process has been of great
interest, because it has consisted in the practical integration of traditional
systems along with diverse techniques of organic farming; we have also tried to
achieve a model of commercialization that does not repeat the pitfalls of a
market where those who most profit are the intermediaries. For this reason, we
have created, along with several other persons of the community, the company
called Ucanehu. It is a socialist entity in which the partners seek, above all,
the greatest income for the producers and justice in the relations of exchange.
Organic bananas are a product
about which much is said lately. There is great interest on the part of
consumers, and of course, on the part of producers. But this also implies a
risk, by the fact that this system of production under forest cover cannot have
an intense density of banana plants. It is also important for this system to
maintain a great diversity of crops and have a management of soils that
prevents the loss of nutrients. These principles become endangered when the
success of the business begins to tempt avoiding conditions that are a priority
in order to achieve a sustainable production and life. Developmentalist
criteria in this system could seriously endanger what is expected, that it is a
productive process which is profitable for the producers, while maintaining the
forest cover, and protecting the aquifers and the fertility of soils. The
possibility of entering a market that has always been dominated by the great
entrepreneurs and transnational companies has also been considered of vital
importance.
Organic bananas should be
managed with criteria that are even more strict than those employed with
organic coffee and other products, specially because of the sensitivity of the
tropical ecosystems, the great precipitation that in many cases surpasses 4000
millimeters a year, and the special conditions of the tropical soils which
easily tend to lose fertility. Moreover, it is important that what has occurred
with the certification of coffee does not occur with bananas. With coffee, the
certification only sees what occurs on the farm, but does not regulate the contamination
of the rivers caused by the processing plants. In this sense, great care should
be taken with the use of fortuitous products, such as houselines or other
implements used in the process.
From utopia to practice
We have passed from utopia to
practice. There are now many producers, technicians, entrepreneurs,
professionals, magicians and musicians that participate in this process. The
actions expand and it is just a matter of time, for people to recognize the
grave consequences the use of agrotoxins promoted by the Green Revolution has
had on the health of humanity and the planet. Today, the same ones who filled
their pockets producing agrochemicals, invest hundreds of millions of dollars
in the new Biotechnological Revolution; it is also said that the problems of
feeding the world will be solved, and that the efficiency of the fight against
pests will increase. In this way Shell, Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz are preparing to
become the owners of the germplasm of the countries of the South. They have established
themselves in several of these countries and take advantage of institutions and
diverse research organizations that sell or simply hand the genetic heritage of
our countries and of humanity over to them. In 1987, Henk Hobbelink, a Dutch
agronomist of GRAIN (Genetic Resources Action International), who has studied
the matter and fought to counteract this new and enormous business of the
transnational companies, told us: "The most preoccupying thing is that
these companies have the opportunity to combine their leadership in plant
production with their dominant position in the production of pesticides. The
future of agricultural development in the South is threatened."
Organic farming is not a
technique; it forms part of the vital field of humanity, agriculture, but also
in the art of what is possible. With this policy, and together with the
environmental, indigenous and alternative movements, important struggles are
defined against the patenting of germplasm, for justice in commerce, for the
revitalization of soils, for biodiversity as the heritage of humanity without
it belonging to transnational companies or private enterprise. It is with
intercultural communication, with agricultural practices, and with the
comprehension of being able to see what is seen, as Moreliano Augusto
expressed, that this agriculture of today and tomorrow will expand and correct
the errors committed against Mother Earth.
THE RECOLLECTIONS OF
MORELIANO AUGUSTO
Moreliano Augusto tells that
bananas are a solar fruit. that the plant harvests the light of the sun and
moon like no other plant. For this reason its fruit are yellow like the rays of
sun and sweet like the honey of "chiquiz ". Moreliano Augusto is a
man of 80 years, indigenous Bribri, who lives in the Tain¡ Reserve, in the
mountains that are behind a plantation of 3,500 hectares of the Standard Fruit
Company, in the Valley of la Estrella.
He recalls how before, the
indigenous people only consumed the primitive banana called "golden
fingers". And in the midst of the interrelations, the conflicts and
recovery of lands that the United Fruit Company abandoned after the pest
outbreaks, floods and diseases sent forth by the US Cares, or spiritual
doctors, the variety called Gros Michel planted by the company is what remained.
These plantations were almost exterminated by Panama disease. Gros Michel was
replaced by Cavendish, but was attacked by a disease called Yellow Sigatoka.
Since then, the banana companies have used great quantities of poisons to
maintain their plantations.
Moreliano Augusto never
understood the practices of the banana companies in those regions of Talamanca.
He recalls how he saw hundreds of thousands of trees cut down with chain-saws
and axes. How they deviated the course of rivers, how he sensed the arrival of
poisons and smelled the beginning of contamination.
The evil of the sikua, or
White Man, was warned by his fathers and grandfathers. At first he was
forbidden from going down to the plantations. With time he came nearer in order
to learn, and today he tells us how he saw the evil of the sikua expand through
the land, the rivers, the subterranean waters, and even through the blood of
men. The poison he smelled without knowing what it was when he crossed the
devastated fields when he went to fish in the sea, today has expanded
(according to the Bribri cosmovision, which is not far from the modern
conceptions of the flow of systems) through all the entrails of the earth.
The chimuri (banana in the
Bribri language) is currently an essential source of nutrition for the
indigenous and peasant communities. It is an important food for the diet of
pigs. The Gros Michel banana was maintained in the agroecological systems of
the indigenous cultures. Under the shade of trees and among the cacao plants,
the Panama disease was controlled, with a traditional management that clearly
understands the way of harvesting the light of the sun and moon, of which
Moreliano tells.
Two totally different systems
were established in a specific geographical region, but they never converged:
the monoculture, promoted by the values that have lead us to the
socio-environmental planetary crisis (expansion, competitiveness, and
production), and a traditional indigenous system of production, characterized
by a sustainable style of production and life, and based on values of respect
for Nature and other living beings.
A DEEP GAZE
Moreliano Augusto simplifies
discourse by gazing, gazing deeply at the soil of his farm. After asking me if
I saw what he saw, again he asked me, as if speaking to the trees, "How is
it possible that the sikuas still do not recognize that the soil is alive, and
like all living beings, it can cry or be happy?" This world vision is the
framework in which we have tried to work with the production of organic
bananas, experimenting with the web of Nature.
"THE CERTIFICATION OF ORGANIC PRODUCTS"
By Cileke Comanne and Javier Bogantesof the Fundación Güilombé.
Certification emerged in
order to guarantee the consumer the quality of an organic product. With the
growing distance between consumer and producer, the certification of organic
products was taken up by certifying agencies, principally European and North
American.
In order to guarantee the
quality of organic products to consumers, seals were invented. These seals are
a guarantee that a certifier gives a product, certifying that not only has the
product been inspected, but that it also complies with the regulations and
norms of organic production of the respective agency.
It is the seal of the agency
which if recognized by the consumer, and it is the trust placed by the consumer
in this seal that permits buying products without qualms. The regulations that
guide organic production try to control the compliance with ecological
techniques. The aspects that are regulated go from production in the farm, to
processes of industrialization, transport, labelling and others.
With this situation that
seeks to guarantee organic products to consumers, several certifying agencies
emerged, particularly in Europe and in the United States. While some of these
are non-profit organizations, the majority are profitable businesses, that
often charge onerous sums in order to certify products of producers in the
South, regardless of whether they are large or small.
It is important to mention
the function of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements
(IFOAM), which has sought the coordination between producers, commercial firms
and certifying agencies. This international organization has also taken on the
challenge of promoting organic agriculture worldwide. To achieve consensus
regarding the norms and regulations, these have been discussed in diverse
assemblies which deal with organic farming in ecological, technical and social
terms. With this aim, norms have been defined which include a system of
accreditation for the certifying agencies and establish the guidelines of
productive processes.
Exporting to Europe: the
approval of the EU
Different European
governments have established norms that must be kept so that a product may be
sold as organic. In the last years, norms have been emmited in Costa Rica and
Argentina; in Mexico, Peru and Brazil norms are also being defined. Since 1991,
the European Economic Community (EEC) has established norms for organic
production. In these norms it is established that the definition of a product
as ecological or biological is synonymous with organic. This definition is of
great importance in order to avoid ambiguous situations, since different seals
at times manipulate these concepts without complying with all the required
conditions, in order to profit with the alternative markets.
Any imported product to the
European Union must be certified by a certifying agency approved by the
Community. Another important aspect is that the European Community has set a
time limit for the countries of origin of organic products to establish their
own norms, duly approved by the powers in charge.
At this time, there are only
three ways to export organic products to Europe: obtain a certification from a
certifying agency approved by the Economic Community; obtain a certification
which is approved by a certifying agency approved by the CEE (today EU); or to
obtain a certification from a non-European agency, but approved by the EU. In
Latin America there exists only one of these, which is the Agencert of
Argentina, a certifying agency directly ratified by the EU.
The small producer and
certification
The certifying agencies are
businesses. Even though some are not for profit, the majority compete for
markets and clients in order to remain in a field where competition has
increased tremendously. Some times, the buyers have their preferences for the
certification of a particular agency; the consequence of this is that the
producers must pay several certifying agencies if they want to sell to several
countries or several buyers.
The certification of an
agency is extremely costly. The producer must cover the costs of air travel,
room and board and salaries of inspectors, which range from 250 to 400 dollars
a day. The internal costs of the agency must also be paid. And this must be
paid every year, since the certification lasts only one year.
When there is a better
coordination among agencies, or if the agencies have established agreements
among themselves, it could be that the agency might give a second
certification, after having approved the first certification. This, of course,
is less costly, but unfortunately the majority of the agencies still do not
have this type of agreement. While only products for export need to be
certified, and the internal markets still do not require certification, we
could ask ourselves what will happen when it is obligatory, both for
international, as well as national markets.
Currently, the organic
producers depend on the certifying agencies. They must pay if they wish to
export. They also depend on the demands of the exporters and buyers of the
products. Some certifying agencies are not for profit, and some can be more
organic than others, in the sense of following the principles of justice upheld
in the organic philosophy. However, many are in it for the money.
Dependence has never been
positive for any producer, and it is even worse for small producers who embark
on the dream of exporting in order to try to improve their economic condition.
There are important experiences in Latin America of small producers who have
united in order to have access to international markets, particularly in the
case of coffee, sesame, cocoa and bananas.
Nevertheless, we should ask
ourselves if in these new alternative markets, the same injustices of
conventional markets are being repeated? Who takes the best slice? It is also
true that diverse organizations have organized to work with Fair Trade seals,
but it seems that the process of globalization, the mega-markets and extreme
utilitarianism are also affecting the good intentions of fair trade or just
markets.
The need for American Latin
agencies
The most effective way to
lower costs of the certification of organic products is to create agencies in
the Latin American countries. These national agencies can reduce, in good
measure, the costs of operation and charge salaries according to the rates of
each country. The best way to create these agencies could be to seek the
support and approval of known agencies who might be willing to aid in
permitting the access to the mentioned markets.
Another advantage of
certifying with national agencies is that the inspectors and certifying
agencies are familiar with the crops and the environments they must certify.
This would avoid situations, such as the well known case of foreign inspectors
asking where the coffee was in a coffee plantation. In order to maintain the
quality of an organic product, it is fundamental to know the particular
characteristics of the diverse ecosystems. It is very difficult for a person
who only is familiar with crops of a temperate climate to inspect crops of the
tropics effectively.
The other typical aspect of
organic export products from tropical or subtropical zones in Latin America is
that the majority are in the hands of organizations of small farmers. The
certification of groups of producers, that generally unite more than 200
families, requires a particular system of certification. It is impossible for
an inspector to visit 100 percent of the farmers, as some agencies demand. In
those cases, the internal controls, the social control and a good
administration are fundamental.
The problem consists in how
to obtain the international recognition of the consumers. One way is for a
recognized agency to support the agency and establish a system of joint
certification, giving continually more responsibility to the national agency.
During a period of time, the products could carry the seal of both agencies
involved, so that the buyers of the products wold begin to recognize and trust
the seal. The difficult thing is to find agencies that are willing to support
this process.
As many of the agencies are
private enterprises, they are not very interested in the quick establishment of
national agencies for the international markets. In Europe we can name at least
two agencies we know of that by their philosophy and internal organization do
have this ideal: KRAV, of Sweden and the Soil Association, of England.
Proposals and principles
In 1992, together with the
Department of Agrarian Science of the National University, the Fundación
Güilombé carried out the first course in Costa Rica on inspection and
certification of organic products. A commission emerged from that course that
achieved a permanent presence in the Department of Vegetable Health of the
Ministry of Agriculture, among whose duties it was to develop a proposal of
organic norms for Costa Rica. This proposal was later taken up by a commission
formed by the Government in 1995. Unfortunately, serious changes were made to
the original proposal.
Given that the problems
regarding certification in the Mesoameri-can region are similar, and that
several initiatives to solve them exist, Fundación Güilombé carried out a
workshop in April of 1997, along with the support of the Humanist Institute of
Holland (HIVOS) and of IFOAM, where 26 organizations participated. These came
from the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Central America and Colombia. The majority
of these organizations are ones who in their countries promote and work for
organic farming and certification, as well as the commercialization of organic
products.
In that workshop there were
several very interesting results. Proposals were made such as the redefinition
of the principles of organic farming. A joint declaration was made with the
proposal to create norms that are more in accord with the productive,
environmental and social realities of the region. An action strategy for the
creation of national certification agencies was also defined.
We synthesize the principles
that were agreed upon, with the aim that the spirit that dominated the workshop
may serve as an inspiration to continue these processes and struggles to
achieve sustainable lifestyles and forms of production
The soil is a
living and scared being.
A holistic focus
is necessary for the understanding of the relationships between humans and
Nature.
Respect and
comprehension of biological and cultural diversities is required.
Environmental
ethics inspired in the sense of belonging and in the interdependence of the
living community are important.
Sustainable
lifestyles and forms of production are sought.
Social justice
between generations and genders are also sought.
Respect for human
rights: laws and conventions regarding labor relations are indispensable.
Equality in the
relations of exchange among those who participate in organic farming:
producers, certifiers, buyers, technicians and others, is needed.
NEW SOCIAL FUND RENDERS FRUITS:
QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE BANANA PLAN-TATION ZONES"
By Omar Salazar Alvarado of the Social Fund of the Costa Rican Fund for
Microprojects (FOMIC)
The Social Fund of the Costa
Rican Banana Plantation Sector (FOSBAS) is an economic organism that has been
functioning since January, 1995, offering credits and donations in support of
productive, social and ecological initiatives of social groups and grass roots
organizations related to the banana industry and its consequences. During 1995,
the Fund worked only in the Atlantic Zone of the country (from Sarapiqui to
Sixaola), but since January of 1996, it expanded into the Southern Zone of the
country, with a presence from Palmar Sur to Rio Claro.
FOSBAS emerged as a result of
the efforts of NGOs, Unions, and communal organizations, who entered in the
impact zones of the banana industry, wrote up an agreement of institutional
collaboration between the Costa Rican Fund for Microprojects (FOMIC) and the
Swiss Cooperation Agency, Helvetas.
The economic funds came from
the sales of bananas of the small Costa Rican producers to European (Swiss and
German) markets, by the mediation carried out by Gebana, a Swiss organization
that promotes and commercializes the Fair banana. Gebana hands over part of the
profits for the financing of small projects.
The beneficiary population of
FOSBAS is made up of the salaried men and women banana plantation workers and
ex-workers, small farmers and landless peasants, women, youth groups,
indigenous groups and migrant banana workers. But likewise, those benefitted
were grass roots organizations (Unions, peasant organizations, cooperatives,
women’s associations, Churches, cultural, ecological and indigenous
organizations) and organizations of promotion and popular education that work
in these zones.
Support is directed to those
activities that are executed by new groups, social organizations and NGOs.
These projects tend to alleviate or resolve social problems derived from the
banana industry, and that considerably affect the human populations that are
directly or indirectly inserted in the banana industry. Financing is divided in
two parts:
1) Credits directed to
productive projects of grass roots organizations, be they of rural or urban
areas linked to the banana sector (with an adequate interest rate). The maximum
ceiling to be approved for a project during 1996 was of 350,000 colones. The
following activities were given first priority: traditional agriculture for
internal or external markets, agroindustry, commercialization, small scale
commerce and services, microbusinesses related to tourism, crafts, natural
medicine, reforestation and protection of watersheds at a low cost and with
community management, communal or family reforestation by way of forest tree
nurseries of native species, small scale animal husbandry by communities or
families, the use of alternative technology, the invention and production of
substitutes for agrochemicals, and the validation of alternative instruments
for production.
2) Donations for projects of
a social character in such areas as health, informal education, organization,
human rights, ecology and environmental protection, culture, support of
community infrastructure and communication. The approximate amount donated per
project is 150,000 colones. Results in two years of work
During the period of
1995-1996, the FOSBAS program has financed a total of 121 projects, of which
112 are social projects and 9 are productive projects.
The amount financed by FOSBAS
for this period was a total of 11,657,501 colones in donations (social
projects) and 2,880,000 colones in credits (productive projects), which reveals
the social vocation of the project.
By county of incidence, we
find that the support has been concentrated in those places where there is a
greater presence of the banana industry in the zone. Pococi is the exception;
it is one of the counties with the greatest banana production where the Fund
has had particular difficulty in entering, maybe for not having emissaries,
maybe for an inadequate promotion, or maybe because this sector is where there
has been the greatest demobilization of the banana workers movement because of
the proliferation of the Solidarista Associations.
The truth is that for 1997,
FOSBAS made an enormous effort to enter the zone, partially achieving its aim
in the first semester, with the reception of six projects, this being the same
number of projects supported in the last two years.
Two areas need to be analyzed
with special care: the areas of ecology and communication, both of which are
considered to be of high impact in the zone. The first, because it points to
concrete and delicate problems in the banana plantation zones; the second,
because it is considered a means with great impact for the development of
organizational initiatives and for the dissemination of information regarding
the problems of the Zone.
In 1997, we began a program
of identification and promotion of grass roots organizations in such areas.
This effort has had positive results already in the first semester of 1997.
The evolution of the Fund in
two years reveals an increase in the placement of funds, both in the amounts
(from 5.75 million in 1995 to 8.78 million in 1996), and in the number of
projects approved which grew by 68.1 percent. Nevertheless, the potential of
the Fund is not used in its totality. The financial movements in 1995 left an
unused amount of 1.6 million colones, and in 1996 the amount left unused was of
1.5 million. However, it is important to note that in 1995, the total available
amount was approximately 5.6 million colones, and in 1996, it was nearly 11.9
million colones.
It is interesting to analyze
the biannual evolution of the Fund, in three areas of priority: the first being
credit or production; the second is the social area of organization, one of the
most solicited; and the third is the fight for justice, where we support a
movement that fights for the rights of the inhabitants of the zones of
incidence.
General conclusions:
·
FOSBAS has become a work tool for the organized inhabitants in the zones
of impact of the banana industry in Costa Rica.
AREAS OF SUPPORT (AREAS TO BE
FINANCED)
HEALTH. Education,
information about eating habits, labor health, support to mobile and temporary
health services, promotion of worker committees of occupational health,
programs for the building of latrines, health clinic for sterilized workers,
dissemination of information, education on the effects of pesticides, education
and promotion of natural medicine, research of current problems of
environmental health and labor health, campaign for the prevention of health
problems.
INFORMAL EDUCATION. Seminars,
workshops, talks, courses, etc. of basic education for direct beneficiaries,
training of leaders, of instructors, of adults, technical training for
productive projects, support to educational activities and training for the
social and grass roots organizations.
ORGANIZATION. Promotion of
the organization of each beneficiary sector, promotion of the capacity to
defend the interests and empowerment of every beneficiary sector, institutional
support for the consolidation of the organization of each beneficiary sector,
partial support for the acquisition of equipment and work instruments of the
organizations of each beneficiary sector, support to pay temporary technicians
for specific activities programmed by the organizations.
HUMAN RIGHTS. Defense of
violated human rights, promotion for the defense of rights, legal support,
research into violations of these rights.
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION. Environmental education, support of education exchanges in the
areas of ecology and organic farming, communal or family reforestation projects
with the creation of forestry nurseries of native species, economic support of
incidence in environmental struggles, audiovisual material about the
environmental and ecological problems of the zone, legal advice to actions of
protection, denunciations and popular mobilizations for the protection of the
environment, support for environmental impact studies, support for lobbying in
national and international ecological institutions.
CULTURE. Support for programs
of cultural protection of ethnic minorities linked to the banana industry,
cultural workshops for the workers of the banana sector, events for the
reaffirmation of cultural identities of the beneficiary sectors, historical
research and salvage of oral traditions among workers of the banana sector.
FIGHT FOR JUSTICE. Support
for social struggles, support for struggles of revindication of the social
organizations of the sector, support to the labor sector in the resolution of
patron-worker conflicts, diagnosis of the problems affecting the social sectors
that have something to do with the banana sector, travel support for lobbying
efforts, support for legal efforts. Studies and dissemination of information
regarding the problems affecting migrant banana workers, defense of the labor
rights of migrant workers.
COMMUNICATION. Support for
communication materials of organizations or groups, training of grass roots
communicators, support to radio programs and grass roots newspapers.
SUPPORT FOR ORGANIZED
COMMUNITY WORK. Partial support for community infrastructure I (construction of
schools, school cafeterias, health centers, community centers), partial support
for community infrastructure II (bridges, mini-aqueducts, streets, others of
communal use, etc.).