[Probe (1992): (XXXII), 1, 20-23]

A Correlative study of Urinary Tract Infection and Calculogenesis in the Shimla Region: A Control Study

Suresh Sharma, P.G. Registrar (Surgery,
D.C. Merwaha, M.S. (Surgery) Assoc. Prof.
and
Prof. R.R. Gupta, M.S. (Surgery)
Prof. and Head, Dept. of Surgery
Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, H.P., India.

ABSTRACT

A bacteriological study of 80 patients with urolithiasis is presented along with evaluation of Cystone (Himalaya)in urolithiasis and recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) in stone formers.

Cystone has proved effective not only in expelling urinary calculi, but also in the prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections.

INTRODUCTION

Controversies do exist in literature on the role of UTI in calculogenesis. It has been postulated that the role of bacterial infection varies in different geographical regions. The present study was undertaken to establish the correlation of UTI with prevalence of urinary stone in the Shimla hills.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Bacteriological study was done on the urine of 80 patients of urolithiasis, admitted to the Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla from January 1987 to December 1987. The urine culture of all the patients was done during the pre-operative period using blood agar and MaConkey’s agar media. The bacteria were recognised by Cruickshank’s method. Significant bacteriuria (count more than 105 organisms/ml) was determined by the method of Leigh and William. All the patients were given suitable antibiotics for one week after culture and sensitivity.

Forty patients having stones up to 1 cm. in diameter (radiologically proven), were given Cystone (Himalaya), 2 tablets t.i.d. for six weeks to three months. Sixteen patients were from the positive culture group, nine having E. coli infection. Radiological examination, urine culture and microscope examination were repeated after six weeks.

Observations

Urine culture of the 80 patients of urolithiasis showed that 31 had significant bacteuria (count >105 organisms/ml), whereas 40 cultures were sterile. Urea-splitting bacteria were isolated from 18 (58%) patients with bacteriuria. E. coli was the commonest organism (35.5%), followed by Klebsiella and Pseudomonas (19.4% each), Proteus (13%), Streptococci (6.4%) and Staphylococci (3.2%) (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of 80 stone patients according to the organisms isolated from urine

 

No. of stone patients

Organism

Upper Urinary

Lower Urinary

Total

Urea-splitting
Proteus vulgaris

4

1

5

Klebsiella aerogenes

4

2

6

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

3

3

6

Staphylococcus

1

-

1

Non Urea-splitting
Escherichia coli

6

5

11

Streptococcus faecalis

1

1

2

Positive cultures

19

12

31

Sterile cultures

44

5

49

Total cultures

63

17

80

Urine analysis of the patients revealed RBCs in 37 (46%), pus cells in 64 (80%), and phosphate crystals in 27 specimens (34%) (Table 2). The most common presenting symptom was pain (83%) followed by dysuria (24%), frequency (20%) and haematuria (18%) (Table 3).

Table 2: Showing urine analysis of the 80 stone patients

Findings

No. of patients

Percentage of cases

Albuminuria

49

61

Microscopic Examination

RBCs

37

46

Pus cells

64

80

Oxalate crystals

36

45

Phosphate crystals

27

34

Uric acid crystals

1

1.25

Table 3: Showing mode of presentation in 80 stone patients

Symptoms

No. of patients

Percentage of cases

Pain

69

86

Dysuria

19

24

Frequency

16

20

Haematuria

14

18

In the Cystone-treated group, repeat radiological examination after six weeks revealed decrease in stone size in 9 patients. Smaller stones, approximately of the size of a ‘grain’, were passed per urethra in four patients. Out of 16 positive culture patients, only two of them were found to have Pseudomonas after 6 weeks of treatment. On microscopic examination of the urine, all the samples were found to be free from pus cells, except in eight samples having 6-8 pus cells per high field.

In the control group, out of 15 positive culture patients, four were found to be culture positive after 6 weeks, eight patients had plenty of pus cells and fourteen had 6-8 pus cells per high field (Table 4).

Table 4: Showing the results

Before

 

After

No. of patients with +ve culture

No. of patients with pus cells

 

No. of patients with +ve culture

No. of patients with pus cells

16

16

Cystone

2

Nil

15

15

Control

4

8

Stone size decreased in 9 patients Stones passed by 4 patients

DISCUSSION

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is frequently found in patients with urinary stone disease. The high incidence (38.6%) seen in the present study is in close agreement with the observations of Malhotra et al. (41.5%) and Williams (31%).

Fifty eight percent of the organisms responsible for the infection were mostly ureasplitting. Of these Klebsiella and Pseudomonas were found in 66.6% of the patients. Non urea-splitting organisms were isolated in 42% of the positive culture cases. E. coli was isolated from 35% of the total positive cultures and formed 85% of the urea splitters. In the Williams series, 78% of the total positive cultures were E. coli, whereas Kumar et al. isolated E. coli in 37.5%.

Although there is some relationship between UTI and calculogenesis, yet many patients may display chronic UTI without stone disease. The present study also indicates that most of the urolithiasis patients (62%) did not have any UTI. It is also recognised that infection by urea-splitting organisms may contribute to calculogenesis by splitting urea and ammonia which, in turn, alkalinise the urine. At such high pH values, phosphate precipitates with calcium, magnesium and ammonium.

Cystone was found to be a good alternative to surgery for urinary stones less than 5 mm in diameter. Cystone has a definite role in UTIs, particularly E. coli infections and in the prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs which are common in stone patients.

REFERENCES

1.

Dandia, S.D., Bhatia, S., Narula, I.M.S. and Pendse, A.K., "Role of Cystone in prevention of urolithiasis: an experimental study in dogs." Ind. J. Surg. (1976): 3, 122.

2.

Hodgkinson, A., "The aetiology and treatment of urinary calculus." Postgrad. Med. J. (1964): 40, 130.

3.

Kumar, R. and Gahlaut, Y.U.S., "Bacteriological study of urinary tract stone." Ind. J. Surg. (1980): 42, 328.

4.

Leigh, D.A. and Williams, J.D., "Methods for detection of significant bacteriuria in large groups of patients." J. Clin. Path. (1964): 17, 498.

5.

Singh, P.P., Goyal, A. and Kumawat, J.L. et al. "Indigenous drugs in modern medicine: a study on Cystone". Arch. Med. Pract. (1983): 2, 43.

6.

Thompson, R.E. and Stamey, T.A., "Bacteriology of infected stones." Urology (1973): 2, 627.

7.

W.H.O., Tech. Rep. Ser. 622, "The promotion and development of traditional medicine," p. 8, 1978.

8.

Williams, R.C., "Long-term survey of 538 patients with upper urinary tract stone." Brit. J. Urol. (1963): 35, 416.