Thanks to DRS
for his assistance in this translation.
2 - These new developments constitute a preoccupation for the class leader, who exerting a sort of technocracy, tries to determine if these expressions -say, web pages- are valid, if they are income-producing in the middle of normative and technological swings. Paradoxicalally, these innovations are not known for the enormous majority of the society. Therefore the naive atmosphere of the first years of Internet should be left behind, in order to get into unexplored future areas.
3 - When we speak about Internet, many images come up to mind. But main ideas are diversity, multiplicity and variety. Internet has no restrictions, and has been the natural vehicle for many forms of expression; although it may sound strange, the very structure of the networks reflecs the authoritarian or democratic intention of those who have designed them. The centralized and military criterion that characterized Internet in its beginnings, has developed -through a necessary topological change- to an anarchical and decentralized structure, valid for the aims of creation and impossible to censure.
4 - This thesis tries to respond - at least in a first attempt - certain questions.
5 - As a bottom line to these questions, this work does not intend to be considered as a sort of Internet behaviour ruler. However, the individual aspect of freedom needs not hamper the existence of an ethic protecting defenseless individuals from violent or excessive contents; it should be taken into consideration, non the less, that the exhibitor of violent pornography in Internet - to mention an example- is finally an individual, who can be subject to sanction.