LOTR
*sigh*
i just finished reading Fellowship of the Ring. its not... what i... expected it to be. after all the "ooohh"s and "aaahhh"s i'd heard about the whole trilogy for so long, i was kind of disappointed when i finished this first book.
in a word: DRAGGING.
it much more than half of the book before the story really started to roll along, and even then it didn't roll along at a good pace! much time was wasted describing the scenery and describing the exact route frodo and company takes on the way to Rivendell. with all due respect to the high and mighty JRR Tolkien, he could have just cut to the chase and said that, ok, Black Riders were after frodo, ok they got lost in the Old Forrest, and then two of his companions were swallowed by Old Man Willow, then Tom Bombadillo comes along and rescues them, then the set out again after resting at Tom's place, then they get lost again and run afoul of the Barrow-wights, then the got rescued by Tom again, then they went on up to the Prancing Pony at Bree, where they meet Strider. Only after then does the story move forward at at a better pace where there are actual events in the lives of the characters to describe, rather than just boring scenery of some hill or mountain. The overly detailed description of the scenery just didn't serve to move the story forward -- the only time it seemed appropriate was when they finally made it to that Elvish kingdom, Lothlorien. Now there, since the scenery was new and Frodo and the rest genuinely seemed interested in the place, there the description of the scenery served to move the story forward.
I have the impression that at the beginning, the author was still self-conscious of his writing. He had to show off his mastery of English and of Writing by describing in every little detail things that had no direct bearing on the story. I think even giving a history of the Shire was a waste of time -- if he wanted to give the reader a good background of the history of the Shire, he should have did it through the point of view of a character in a story, not through direct encyclopedia-like descriptions. The factual descriptions again only served to draw attention to the author's mastery of his art and not to the story itself.
at any rate, after Frodo's arrival at Bree and then at Rivendell, the story moved along a bit better. it was only then that the story really began to move forward. I feel that the book should have been shorter than it was, or, if you want the book to be of the same size, then the whole thing should have been combined with the second book, to make one big book. if you take out all the "fat" from the Fellowship of the Ring, then it would have served as several good introductory chapters in the second book.
The Fellowship of the Ring lacked so many things in so many points -- there was little drama, and little action, and certainly very little magic. it read as if it were some ordinary, dull, fiction that just so happened to be set in the middle-ages. When I read it, i felt like i was trying to chew a really old, really stale and "MAKUNAT na" cookie. Sorry, but the author can't hold a candle to the likes of Arthur Clarke, or Isaac Asimov, or Robert Heinlein. ok so these guys are all into Sci-Fi, not Fantasy, but they all know how to pace their stories and not get bogged down in detailed descriptions of environments that are familiar already either to the characters themselves and to the reader. I mean, if the character can't have a sense of wonder about his environment, how can a reader feel any sense of wonder himself?
I think i have even fonder memories of the Riftwar Saga by Raymond Feist! I remember that I couldn't put his books down and I had to finish each book in one or two days. But then that was more than 10 years ago; who knows how i might find them if i re-read them now...
Maybe Fellowship of the Ring was already good for its time. It was written sometime from 1936 onwards until its publication in the 1950's. And maybe back then, standards and tastes were different from today. (Although I can't help but think of Robert Heinlein, who started writing his greatest works in the 1940's i think). In any case, I rate the Fellowship of the Ring three stars out of five, five being the highest.
Posted by lone_geek
at 11:31 AM WST
Updated: Sunday, 28 December 2003 11:34 AM WST