BABES IN
ARMS: CHILDREN IN "THE WILD BUNCH" a commentary by Tony McRae Most critics who've written about Sam Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch
(1969) speculate on the presence of children in the film, usually coupling
them with the many violent scenes in the movie such as the opening and
closing sequences, both of which turn into blood baths that had rarely
been seen before on film. Why does Peckinpah insist on
children as witness? they ask. These critics usually answer their
own question by stating that war and violence are corruptions and that
children are their primary victims, who will, in all likelihood, reenact
the violence they experience later in their lives. Perhaps.
But it is the "look" of the children, their gaze of awe and
fright and bewilderment that seems at the heart of their presence.
In virtually every scene in which they appear they are looking up
at adults, often with admiration, even respect. I find these gazes
compelling and frightening. A motif that sets The Wild Bunch
apart from other westerns is this insistence on having children present no
matter what the occasion, be it an abstinence parade, a bloody gunfight, a
respite in a Mexican village. I counted thirteen occasions when children are present or play a role in the
action. In one of the great openings in film, Pike Bishop (William Holden)
leads his men--disguised as army soldiers--into a Texan border town to rob a
railroad office bank. On the outskirts they pass a circle of children
poking at scorpions being attacked by hundreds of red fire ants, their
young clear faces smiling and giggling as the
ravaging ants swarm around the scorpions.
After the aborted holdup the remnants of the Bunch
make their escape, and pass the same children who are now throwing straw onto the scorpions and ants and setting
them on fire, their faces sweetly aglow as if they were listening to a bedtime
story. Bracketed between these two scenes of the children is the ambush of the
Bunch and the ensuing carnage as the Bunch and the bounty hunters
slaughter each other and civilians alike. The shooting begins as an
abstinence parade (including children with swinging arms and happy faces)
passes by the railroad office. Throughout the ensuing battle we see a young
boy and girl, probably brother and sister, no more than nine or ten years
old, as they watch the blood letting. During this sequence Peckinpah cuts
from the battle to these
two children six times, their faces a mixture of awe and fright.
Other children
can be seen huddled protectively beside a wall (three cuts). Later, as the bounty
hunters plunder the dead bodies, some eight or nine children run among the
dead bodies and reenact the shooting, using their fingers as guns. Later, in Angel's village the Bunch holds up and rests. Children
and babies are everywhere: Angel sings a Mexican song to a mother and her
two children; other children surround members of the Bunch and look at
them with admiration. We see much of this scene through Pike's weary
eyes. Perhaps he recalls the children surrounding the scorpions and
ants, perhaps he sees the bleak future for these Mexican children.
Earlier he'd told Dutch (Ernest Borgnine) that the railroad job was to be
his last, and perhaps for a moment he's thinking of giving it all
up. But for what? There is no doubt he has regrets, but what
are they? Obviously he blames himself for his role in the betrayal of his
friend Deke Thornton (Robert Ryan) who is now forced by the railroad to
hunt the Bunch down. Pike Bishop and the others live by a code of
standing by your friends. He does not shoot women or children, and
ironically in the last scene he is shot in the back by both. The
Bunch is bad, no question, yet those that fight them are worse: the
railroad wants their money back, and if that means killing innocents, so
be it; Mapache (Emilio Fernandez) is a thug who claims to be helping his
people, but in fact rapes the land for his own appetites. After the Bunch leaves Angel's village they travel to Mapache's
stronghold to make a deal with the generalissimo. Here again
children are everywhere, though they remain in the background. This
is the Bunch's first visit to this encampment, and when they return for the
climatic battle one child at least will take up arms against
them. In the spectacular train robbery sequence the Bunch seems to pull off
the heist without a glitch, but Thornton is ready for them and with his
men he follows in pursuit. But the army who is supposed to aid
Thornton and give chase is made up of "green recruits" who do
more harm than good. In fact, they are hardly men at all but mere
boys, probably no more than seventeen or eighteen. Peckinpah
underlines in no uncertain terms the old truism that war is old men
sending young men into battle. As Mapache waits at a train station for the arms the Bunch will
deliver, he is attacked by Pancho Villa's forces. Though it's quite
obvious he is greatly outnumbered and outgunned, he stands his ground with
bravado. We have the distinct impression he does this to
impress the young telegraph messenger who clearly adores the
generalissimo. In
his turn, Mapache smiles affectionately down at the lad, the one
time he shows any humanity.
In the final sequence in Mapache's stronghold, Angel (Jaime Sanchez) is
held by the Mexicans for stealing rifles for his village. He is
dragged in the street behind a car and the village's children run after
him, laughing and jumping on him, tormenting him in the most vicious way. Their
action should prepare us for the last minutes of the film when Pike is
shot in the back by a boy who can't be more than twelve. I find it interesting that most times when groups of children are
present, they are performing acts of violence, be it against insects
(scorpions and ants) or pretending to shoot one another in the street
after the first gunfight or tormenting a man being dragged behind a
car. So we come back to our first question: what is Peckinpah up to
here? Yes, children are affected by violence and perhaps corrupted
by it. But those children with the scorpions and ants--might we
infer that they are tainted, that we humans are naturally inclined
to violence from an early age? Or maybe the violence which permeates
the air makes even the young inured. The two young Mexican boys,
Mapache's messenger and the one whose shot kills Pike, they are the future
for Peckinpah, they will inherit the mantle of violence of Mapache and
Pike and Deke Thornton. It's a bleak outlook which tempers The
Wild Bunch's message that standing by your friends whatever the cost
is paramount, that one does what needs doing despite overwhelming
odds.
In Angel's village an elder says to Pike: "We all dream of being a
child again, even the worst of us. Perhaps the worst most of all."
But what child? I think it's significant that the respite in the
village is the one time when children are seen as children, or at least as
the kind of children we hope will inherit the earth. Perhaps Pike
and the Bunch believe this when they walk to their death to save Angel,
the youngest among them. At the very end of the film Deke and Sykes
(Edmond O'Brien) ride off with men from Angel's village to fight, we
presume, for the cause of Mexican liberation--and to give the next
generation a chance. Peckinpah would probably say, "a fighting
chance." Peckinpah has taken pains in this movie to include the entire range of
the young, from an infant suckling at a mother's breast to fledglings of
eight or nine to preteens to fresh-faced army kids. I can't help but
believe that this is deliberate, that somehow he wishes us to see
and feel the presence of all these youths. Seen from this
perspective The Wild Bunch becomes a cautionary tale of great
poetic and visceral impact. The viewer must decide how to respond. ***************************** Back to Top Trips.