Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« February 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Misc.
Poker
Politics
Religion
Television
Sleepless in Fulham: Rambling and gambling by David Young
Wednesday, 1 February 2006
Hints and cheats.
Topic: Misc.
I completed URU: Ages beyond Myst this morning. It's a puzzle game based on the idea of exploring an ancient but extinct civilisation. Actually, I say I completed it, but I needed a lot of assistance. In fact without the hints I found online, I don't think I would have ever done it given a million years.

Spoiler:

Take the final scene for instance. In order to know that it exists at all, you have to realise that a comment you hear from a recording of a woman's voice talking about giving back what you have taken, means that you should return to all four levels that you've visited and undo the last thing you did while there.

Doing this takes you to another place, where you are supposed to note down the symbols drawn on the floor. You then return to the place where you started, from which you're meant to go back to the room where you first encountered a hologram and select those symbols on the .... Oh sorry am I losing you?

My point is that I'm struggling to believe that ANYONE could have completed this game without going online for hints. So many times I got half-way through a puzzle, having done the hard part of sketching out diagrams of stained-glass windows or hieroglyphics before coming to a dead end. Sometimes consulting the hints led to a reaction of 'but of course!', but on most occasions, it was 'how the hell was I supposed to figure that out?'.

Spoiler:

A case in point - in one level, you find that you can't access an area of a cave because it's pitch black. You're supposed to realise that you have to go to a different area of the same level and walk into a swarm of fireflies, some of whom will follow you.

Except it's not that simple. The fireflies only cluster around you if you walk. As soon as you run, they vanish. They also don't like rain, so if it starts raining you have to get under a covered passageway until it stops. In the least logical bit of all, you have to somehow figure out that the flies will follow you if you cross water ONCE but not a second time. This is supposed to drive you to devise a river crossing using some discarded barrels.

I honestly don't think that a team of Stephen Hawkins, Alan Turing and Albert Einstein could have worked all that out. In my case, I never even noticed the fireflies in the first place. I thought they were spores from the nearby plants.

Having said that, I did have fun with the game. The landscapes and the soundtrack are amazing and when you do figure something out and advance to the next level, there is a real sense of accomplishment and excitement at the coming revelations.

But no more jumping in puzzles games ... EVER, please.

Thursday, 2 February 2006 - 11:23 AM GMT


I'll post this here as you seem to lose interest with older comments.

In solidarity with a modern, democratic world everyone should have this link on their website.

http://epaper.jp.dk/30-09-2005/demo/JP_04-03.html

Thursday, 2 February 2006 - 8:37 PM GMT

Name: David Young

I agree. So I shall hot link it:

Mohammed cartoons, click here.

DY

Friday, 3 February 2006 - 12:45 AM GMT

Name: James Feeny

DY I am into the PS2. Ever played getaway. Real pictures of London. Different gravy!!

Saturday, 4 February 2006 - 2:51 AM GMT


“We will not accept less than severing the heads of those responsible,” a preacher told 9,000 worshippers at al-Omari Mosque in Gaza.

I am very disappointed that none of the UK papers have had the bottle to print these cartoons. This self censorship for the fear of offending religious fanatics is a worrying development.

Saturday, 4 February 2006 - 3:48 PM GMT

Name: James Feeny

One thing I dont actually understand is, what are they actually doing here? Britain should explain that this is a Christian country and if you do not except our values you must leave?

Surely this isnt out of the question?

Tuesday, 7 February 2006 - 1:08 PM GMT


"One thing I dont actually understand is, what are they actually doing here? Britain should explain that this is a Christian country and if you do not except our values you must leave?"

Actually, there's a lot you understand. For instance, the word you should have used was "accept" and not "except"

I'm not a christian, but nor am I a muslim. Do I have to leave as well or is there some halfway house for non-believers?

Personally, I'd like to live in a country where really dumb people don't pontificate on matters about which they know little or nothing. It's not going to happen, so I just get on with life. Maybe if more people did that then we'd all be a lot happier.

Tuesday, 7 February 2006 - 2:10 PM GMT


I think they should be removed from our country. For every attack we should drop a nuke on them. See if they want to attack us then.

Tuesday, 7 February 2006 - 4:04 PM GMT


When our response to their attacks is to commit greater atrocities against them, we've lost the battle. They've won by turning us into them. In case you've not been around for the last few years, that's what they want.

You're too stupid to realise that, but never mind.

Tuesday, 7 February 2006 - 9:35 PM GMT

Name: Adam

Whats your answer then since you think that you are so great.

Wednesday, 8 February 2006 - 12:48 PM GMT


Put it this way, it's complicated, and you might not like it.

Perhaps if the corporate greed culture prevalent in the West (and in particular in the United States) wasn't so insidious and unjust, and thus if our governments and corporations were not perpetuating injustices and bleeding whole nations dry in the pursuit of cash, then perhaps the breeding grounds that exist for these fucking headcases to brainwash their recruits wouldn't exist, and we would not be looking down the barrel of a grand clash of ideaologies lasting for a thousand years (or until the oil runs out, whichever comes first).

That would be a start.

Thursday, 9 February 2006 - 1:22 AM GMT

Name: James Feeny

Ok So you are stating your point of view on a hypothetical situation. Its a view based on "oh if this world was like this or that". What about your answer to the situation as it is. You talk about America being greedy. I think its human nature. Whatever country being the only super power in the world would be the same. We are all human at the end of the day. Surely communist Russia was the same?

View Latest Entries