Thursday, 8 June 2006 - 7:00 PM BST
Name:
David Young
Great to hear from a first time poster.
It's interesting that this has already been examined for a TV documentary. I wish I had seen it. It would be more interesting to me if they had used a 747 rather than a light plane, but I can understand that it might be hard to persuade an airline to release one for a TV documentary! I don't know whether the 747 would be easier to land or harder. I think that modern jumbos do have computer guided landing as an option.
I recall standing in PC World a few days after the 9-11 attacks and seeing the 'games' on the shelf. I felt uneasy, as I wondered whether the hijackers could have learned what they needed to know from them. I guess if enough people practice on these games, it would make hijacking slightly harder in future. Given that landing is the part that suicide hijackers would not need to do, and passengers wanting to live WOULD need to do, the documentary's findings are somewhat concerning. Maybe the control tower at the airport could advise, if communications were still operational.
As for your site, it looks quite entertaining. I'm hopeless at these poker betting markets, as I don't really follow the scene. It's the sort of thing that Neil Channing likes. Mind you, he'd probably see it as an opportunity to make a book on how many runners YOU got!
DY