|
Even the growing thin is not an invention of this age as it may seem. Some Old Indian and Ceylonian images which cannot be numbered among
evidences of existence of women with real wide hips, prove that.
In fact, these attempts show us doubtlessly that those
ideals stem from truly natural ideal of female figure endowed with wide hips and normal waist. Wasp waist ideal originate from
ordinary women's aspiration to look similar to the ideal in accessible ways. As a matter of fact, those
trials to expose narrow-waisted ideals only confirm absolute absence of
women endowed with proper forms in modern reality.
Below I adduce two examples of such attempts.
Some facts give in the Women:
Body Politic page make think that curvy outlines female figure has got considered
normal because the anatomists of 18th century learned female
skeleton on remains of women whose rib cages were really
narrowed down due to continual wearing tight corsets in life.
As a matter of fact "wasp-waisted" vogue reflects aspiration to
the steady hereditary ideal of wide hips. And the former women's rib cages show
just the power of the subconscious archetype.
 ![]()
In another case (see
the ABC News report) two bold scientists have found that men from the remote
partly-westernized village
in Peru prefer "normal" female figure to curvy narrow-hipped that are so much
appreciated by men worldwide. They consider figures of the latter sort to be a consequence
of a disease like diarrhea. It sounds amusing. But as to me, something else is
amusing a little more here.
Notice that all the female figures
of various body types depicted in the test picture bear the same pose — legs like the
letter K
!
It is like an instinct to portray women in this pose truly habitual for them.
Otherwise something is missing in female figure, specially in one with normal, not constricted waist.
Concerning the Peruvian men's preferences, I think it is a bad idea in general to search
the answers to how we should live or what female figure is better among
primitive tribes. They do live in the nature, but certainly not in proper human environment
where our species were formed, and where we would feel most comfortable without
any artificial thing. Also their lifestyle is doubtlessly not proper human one. For instance, in the past
the most of savage tribes performed human sacrifices or even were cannibals until
European Christian missioners
dissuaded them from such practices. So, maybe we should acknowledge such social relations and diet as human
natural? Should we copy these examples too?
On the other hand, Western civilization resists instinctively the hostile
natural environment, and changes it in order to meet human demands. Of course,
very many mistakes are made in this way owing to our ignorance of the
biological homeland of humanity.
![]() Thus, we see now that women feel subconsciously their bodily imperfection, suffer for
this reason, and feign genuine femininity as far as possible.
Female bodily charm that is so much cared by women, and regarded by them as
a sign of women's superiority over men, as something for what men are ready to obey women unconditionally, turns out now to be
sham and fake. Their preoccupation with their semblance just refutes what they attempt to prove
by its means. And all this just removes the last doubt that something is seriously wrong with our women.
Now welcome to the
Anatomy Of Female Psyche
| 
