Freud and Ecopsychology by Kelley Rambo

In Ecological Psychology,
Deborah Winter covers a great deal of psychological theory as it pertains
to the current environmental crisis. Taking traditional ideas and
applying them to understanding human environmental behavior is a key theme
throughout the book. Because of the immense amount of psychology
present and my own lack of knowledge in that field (as it is still very
new to me being trained primarily in field biology and agricultural sciences),
I have chosen to summarize the information presented on Freud's ideas.
Freud has traditionally been, especially for me, a theorist with highly
questionable ideas. It has been helpful to gain a clearer understanding
of his ideas. Although I may not agree completely with all of the
Freudian psychology presented, much of it does make sense in light of what
environmental behaviors I have personally witnessed. I feel that
this information will add to my proficiency in understanding psychology's
traditional theories.
Stemming from interdisciplinary foundations, the emerging field of ecopsychology looks at the relationship of human beings with the more-than-human world and how these relationships influence behaviors and perceptions. It offers a point of convergence for the more traditional disciplines. Ecopsychology provides the opportunity for a common language to emerge and for the sharing of ideas that had once been restricted to specific fields of study.
Due to their obvious involvement in its formation, ecopsychology strives to bring the fields of ecology and psychology, among others, to common ground. These two fields have traditionally functioned separately and even, at times, at odds. Biologists have questioned the scientific validity of psychology, whereas psychologists have doggedly defended the importance of the individual's story. In today's world of toxic waste and ozone depletion, some type of action becomes necessary in order to curb the decline in the quality of human habitat. In my opinion, this action starts with the sharing of information and the crossing of borders, networking with those that we haven't typically spoken with in the past, hence, many of the goals which ecopsychology seeks to obtain.
As
I attempt to explain ecopsychology to colleagues in the environmental studies
field, they often respond with curiosity as to how psychology can benefit
their own work as ecologists. Where is the link between the two seemingly
different fields of study? One rarely finds an ecologist without
an innate love of nature. To this, the ecologist is often a type
of activist. I don't necessarily mean the type of activist chained
to trees or hunting down whaling boats, but I am referring to the activist
that takes the time to educate his neighbor on the importance of recycling
or the one that finds it important to volunteer for a local environmental
organization or conservation commission or yet the one that chooses to
do without many products in order to personally conserve resources.
What makes one an environmental activist? And how can an activist
better educate others in order to make changes in society's behaviors towards
nature to create something more positive? These are important questions
that decades of psychological research in regards to human behavior may
be able to help answer.
What would Freud have said
about the environmental crisis? What would one of the most influential
figures from the 19th century have offered as ways of curbing environmental
degradation? First though, how did Freud himself view the human relationship
with nature? Here he writes:
Freud's primary theories were based on four main concepts which included: 1) unconscious reasoning motivates much of our behavior, 2) "conflict is universal, chronic and inevitable" (Winter, p. 116), 3) personalities are formed "in the body," so to speak, at an early age, and 4) that in order to function at a "normal" level in society, we create a split of awareness between wanted and unwanted thoughts, feelings and desires and use defenses, which will be described later, to contain them. Two other important ideas of Freud's included one which he called Eros and, the other, Thanatos. Eros, named for sexual instincts, Freud believed to be fundamental in the shaping of the adult personality. Thanatos represents Freud's idea that humans have "an unconscious, inborn, irrational need for destruction (Winter, p. 118)."
In regards to these last two ideas, it is important to take into context the world in which Freud conducted his work. Freud, born in 1856, was a part of the Jewish urbanization of Vienna during his youth. The influx of Jews into the city paralleled a rise in anti-Semitic feelings. Freud, enlisting into academia, felt himself pushed outside of mainstream academics. His comfortability with his role as an outsider, though, may have influenced his later style of psychotherapy, one of an objective observer simply witnessing the client, making notes of his own which may or may not become known to the client in future sessions. Freud also conducted much of his research "in a sexually repressive society which forbade his patients, mostly female, opportunities for expressing their sexual desires (Winter, p. 117)." Based on what was considered bizarre behaviors, "Freud came to believe that psychological functioning is a creative outcome of the interplay between physical, instinctually based drives and the social, cultural, and moral pressures to tame, channel, subdue or repress them (Winter, p. 117)." It was from these experiences and the emergence of both World Wars that Freud developed his ideas regarding human nature and behavior.
As mentioned before, one of the main ideas of Freud's theories was that "the human psyche...is predominately unconscious and unobservable (Winter, p. 118)." Our behavior is driven by selfish desires and fears which, in Freud's ideas, are hidden from the conscious leading us to believe that our actions are instead linked to moral or rational reasons. The infamous Freudian slip refers to the times when the unconscious reveals itself through things such as racist or sexist jokes or slips of the tongue. Winter uses the example here of "a student who 'accidentally' misspells Freud as Fraud, thereby unconsciously verbalizing rejection of his ideas (Winter, p. 119)."
The second main idea of Freud's work was that conflict is central. Freud named three psychological structures: the id -- the pleasure seeking structure; the ego -- the pragmatic structure; and the superego -- the moral structure influenced by parents and society. These three structures, as Freud believed, operate on a daily basis, influencing our decision making process, continually creating a sense of inner conflict. Winter uses the example here of "the experience of buying a fast-food hamburger. The id experiences hunger; the ego considers price, convenience and nutrition; the superego might...[question]...the moral implications of contributing to rain forest destruction" through the purchase of beef products imported from cleared Third World rain forests (Winter, p. 121). One structure may out win the other. For instance, the moral superego may lose out as the id grows hungrier, or the id, advised by the pragmatic ego, may not be hungry enough to wait in a long line. Winter writes that "many of our environmental choices involve conflicts of just this sort (Winter, p. 121)." Our consumerism allows us to enact pro-environmental choices, as long as price and convenience are also available. Likewise, the superego can cause anxiety, guilt or shame when the consumerist appetite of the id goes unchecked.
Probably one of the most well-known and questioned principles of Freud's theory is the bodily basis of adult personality. Terms like "penis envy" and "Oedipal complex" are seemingly well known, though possibly not well understood. This aside, however, another application of this idea is in that Freud believed that our adult personality has foundations in our bodily life experiences. For example, trauma or other physical experiences that may have occurred early in life can "give rise to character traits later in life (Winter, p. 123)." Some alternative physical therapies, such as cranio-sacral therapy, believe that our bodily cells hold memories of our experiences as well (Feltman, p. 66-74).
The fourth Freudian principle
is one in which he believed that in order to function normally in society,
individuals "split" their awareness in order to defend themselves from
anxiety. We can continue a behavior, in essence, without full acknowledgment
of the long-term consequences. Winter uses the example of continuing
behaviors that are environmentally destructive without regard to long-term
ecological effects. Freud discussed several defense mechanisms, specific
ways in which we are able to avoid feelings of anxiety. These mechanisms
include:
Using these four main principles,
Freud developed what is called the object relations theory. In essence,
it says "that we construct our sense of self from our interactions with
others, particularly the person who was our primary caretaker (Winter,
p. 135)." Winter believes that "our relationship to our caretaker
sets the foundation for our relationship with the planet (Winter,
p. 138)." Theories that discuss early relationships with the
primary caretaker often refer to the self/other split that occurs at a
point in early childhood development. It is at this point that the
child becomes aware of himself as an organism separate from others.
This point is critical in the child's development as it could lead to later
psychological difficulties if one of at least three circumstances occur.
These include:
Whenever one uses a psychological theory to explain an individual's behavior, it is important to look at the person in a holistic light. There typically is not just one reason why a person behaves the way they do. More often it is a composite picture made up of various experiences. Central to Freud's ideas, however, behavior, hence "environmental behavior," is developed in early childhood. It is from the experiences we have as children that lead to our development of positive relationships with others and with the earth. Using Freud's theory, how does one develop positive environmental behavior, then? It seems that it first begins by establishing healthy human relationships, ones where trust is foremost and expectations are realistic and present. I have spent half of my life educating children of all ages and socio-economic backgrounds in the natural sciences and cultural history. In my experiences, it has always been a challenge to nurture positive relationships between the earth and children of troubled homes or inconsistent parenting, let alone aid them in establishing trust in others.
As there is hope in Freud's view of nature, there is also hope that as adults we can repair any developmental damage experienced as children, otherwise there would be no reason for psychotherapy to exist! Probably the best way to do this is through developing awareness. Freudian practitioners hope to bring a person's unconscious motivations into their conscious awareness so that they may be dealt with and the associated anxiety lessened. Winter points out that the defenses that we use to block environmentally related anxiety take up energy that could otherwise be put to more creative uses. Like Freud, she suggests that the best way to overcome these defenses is to become aware of them. It is important to become aware not only of one's own defenses, but that those defenses are used by others as well. It is often important for individuals to know that they are not alone in their feelings. The same sense of awareness is also necessary in combating narcissism, depression or paranoia. For instance, sometimes there is a real risk involved if women enter natural areas alone. It is important for them to realize the motivation behind why they do not go for walks in the park and possibly even find another woman or a group of women to go walking with them. This also relates back to the development of positive human relationships, trust and eventually positive environmental relationships.
Freud's theories, when explained,
can be helpful in encouraging the development of positive environmental
behaviors as well as, for the activist, understanding some of the negative
behaviors related to the environmental crisis. It's not to say that because
your neighbor throws his garbage in your recycling bins that he has poor
object relations development...but then again, maybe it could! The
key is by creating understanding we can create relationship and trust of
other human beings which will then filter over into our relationships with
the more-than-human world.

DuNann Winter, D. Ecological Psychology: Healing the Split Between Planet and Self (New York: HarperCollins Pub, 1996)
Feltman, J. Hands-On
Healing: Massage Remedies for Hundreds of Health Problems (Emmaus,
PA: Rodale Press, 1989)