Home
Up

Particulate Emission Control In Di Diesel Engine With Bimetal Catalyst

K. Balagurunathan, V. Arumugham and D. Ganesh
Thermal Science Division, Anna University, Chennai

Abstract


Now a days, Diesel Engines are gaining much importance due to its better thermal efficiency and high fuel economy. Hence it is widely used in automobiles, industrial units and power plants . In recent years concern over the contribution of diesel engine particulate emissions - particulate matter (PM) and oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) to environmental pollution has resulted in a significant increase in research and regulatory activity in this area world wide.

In this work, the experimental investigation on particulate emission control using uncoated and bimetal catalyst coated ceramic filters for different brake power output have been investigated. The bimetal catalyst used are Chromium-Copper, Chromium-Barium,Chromium-Calcium and Chromium-Ferrous combination. The smoke intensity was found to be reduced by more than 63% by the use of ceramic filters. Chromium-copper bimetal combination have yielded a maximum trapping efficiency of 84 % whereas Chromium-ferrous bimetal combination have yielded only 50.9 % trapping efficiency.

Introduction

In recent years, The concern over our environment has led to substantial action by the executive and legislative branches of government both the state and Federal level(USA). The sources of air pollution are mainly automobiles, industrial units and power plants. It is estimated that about 20 to 30% of air pollution arises from automobile emissions. The major emission from diesel engines are particulate matter (PM), smoke and NOx. The NOx exposure to sunlight release ozone. This increases the lung ailment. Ozone also escapes to rural areas where it reduces crop yields.

The present investigation aims at trapping the particulate by ceramic filters. Particulate trap technology is the only acceptable choice among all available measure. Trap system is extremely efficient method to curtain the finest particles with higher filtration rate. 

Particulate Trap system represent the Best Available Technology (BAT). There is no chance for an abnormal influence of the exhaust gas emission through the trap system. But on course time, the filter becomes loaded with particulate and further trapping of particulate becomes difficult. These particulate oxides at temperature above 500oC and this temperature is not easily attained during normal engine operation. Therefore, a mechanism is necessary for removing these particulate by oxidation so as to facilitate further trapping of particulate. This process is referred to as regeneration. In the present investigation, this regeneration is achieved by coating the ceramic filter with different catalyst materials. When the ceramic filter is coated with a catalyst, the regeneration temperature is significantly reduced and the particulate oxidize at much lesser temperature which can be achieved during normal engine operation. The particulate emission reduction is experimentally investigated by geometric measurements by using filter papers. Parameter such as PM,Trapping Efficiency, Pressure drop, Brake thermal efficiency, specific fuel consumption and smoke intensity before and after coating of the filter have been Investigated.

Literary Work:

Horiuch et al[1] investigated the reduction behavior of diesel particulate and soluble organic fractions by flow through type oxidation catalysts under steady and dynamic energies conditions using a current fuel of Sulphur content of 0.38% by weight.

WR Wade et al[2] have assessed thermal and catalytic techniques for regulating particulate traps.

Toshihino Mihare et al[3] prepared honey comb mullite fibre filter for collection of solid particulate.

N.A. Kyrikis et al[4] have developed a model for simulating the behavior of the ceramic filter.

John H. Johnson et al[5] have developed the control catalysts in response to more stringent EPA standards for diesel emissive.

Experimental Work:

The experimental procedure involves the investigation of the following parameters namely Brake power, Specific fuel consumption, Particulate emission measurement, Trapping efficiency, Pressure drop, Smoke intensity.

Particulate Emission Measurement:

Particulate emission is measured by weighing the filter paper on a electronic micro balance before and after collection. The paper is exposed to the exhaust for a period of five seconds and particulate emission is measured in g/h. Then the specific particulate matter is calculated by using the formula

Specific PM = g / kWh

Trapping Efficiency:

Trapping efficiency is calculated by using the formula (Raw emission - Emission with ceramic filter)

The figure shows that the particulate emission is less for Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter. This is due to good catalytic oxidation of particulates.

Trapping Efficiency

The variation of trapping efficiency for different filters with brake power is shown in Figure (3) It shows that the trapping efficiency decreases as brake power increases. This is due to the following reasons.

(i) Increase in velocity of exhaust gas due to increased brake power

(ii) Formation of more diesel particulates with increased brake power.

Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter offers the maximum trapping efficiency of 84% at full load and this is due to very good catalytic activity of Chromium - Copper combination when compared to other bimetal combination. Chromium - Ferrous bimetal combination gives trapping efficiency of 50.9% at full load and this is lowest trapping efficiency among all catalyst coated ceramic filters. The least trapping efficiency is observed with uncoated filter and it is 47.8% at full load.

Pressure Drop

The difference in pressure developed between upstream and downstream of the ceramic filter is known as pressure drop. The trap inevitably increases the back pressure. The negative consequences are increased pumping work and thus a proportional deterioration of fuel consumption.

The variation of pressure drop with brake power is shown in Figure (4) It shows that the pressure drop increases with brake power because of higher exhaust gas velocity and also due to the collection of more particulates in the ceramic filter. The pressure drop is minimum for Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter when compared to the other filters because the regeneration temperature of the Chromium - Copper combination is low and it is 4.2 cm of water column at 70% load and 3.15 cm of water column at full load. Chromium - Ferrous and Chromium - Calcium combination have more pressure drop compare top Chromium - Copper bimetal catalyst coated ceramic filter. Uncoated ceramic filter have maximum pressure drop of 9.5 cm of water column at full load because of more collection of particulate.

Brake Thermal Efficiency

The variation of brake thermal efficiency with brake power is shown in Figure(5) It shows that the brake thermal efficiency is slightly reduced with ceramic filters for increase of brake power due to the back pressure developed. Figure reveals that uncoated ceramic filters has maximum reduction in brake thermal efficiency of 10.8% at full load. Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter have lesser reduction in brake thermal efficiency because of effective regeneration and the value is 3.6% at full load.

Brake Specific Fuel Consumption

The variation of brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) with brakes power is shown in Figure(6) with the use of various ceramic filters, the BSFC decreases with increase of brake power. Chromium - Ferrous combination has much increase n BSFC and this s due to higher regeneration temperature and hence more back pressure. Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter have lesser increase in BSFC of 0.034 g/kWh from without filter at full load.

Smoke Intensity

The variation of smoke intensities for different filters with brake power is shown in Figure(7) It shows that the smoke intensity increases with increase of brake power. The maximum smoke intensity is observed at maximum brake power. With the use of catalyst coated ceramic filters, the smoke intensities are reduced Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter gives the maximum smoke reduction and it is 78.8% at full load. Smoke intensity is maximum for raw emission and it is 7.2 BSU at full load. Chromium -Ferrous bimetal coated ceramic filter have a relatively higher smoke intensity among other filters.

To sum up the results it is emphasized that the performance depends on the following parameters.

Particulate deposits in the filter depends on

bulletRegeneration response
bulletDeposition behavior
bulletTrapping efficiency

Regeneration rate depends on

bullet Particulate deposits
bullet Exhaust gas temperature
bullet Specific particulate loading
bullet Exhaust gas velocity
bullet Catalyst used in the trap.

Pressure drop and trapping efficiency depends on 

bulletSize and surface area of the filter
bulletParticulate deposits
bulletMaterial properties
bulletFlow conditions

Conclusion

The following conclusions are drawn from the investigation carried on the uncoated and four bimetal catalyst coated ceramic filters.

Particulate emission is minimum for Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter and it is 0.482 g/kWh at 50% load and 0.34 g/kWh at full load.

Chromium - Barium bimetal coated ceramic filter is also good in oxidation of particulates better than Chromium - Ferrous combination.

Maximum particulate emission was observed without the presence of the ceramic filter (raw emission) and it is 2.42 g/kWh at 50% load and 2.0 482 g/kWh at full load.

The trapping efficiency was maximum for Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter and the maximum value is at 84% full load.

The Chromium - Barium bimetal coated ceramic filter have a reasonably high filtration efficiency (72.5% at full load).

The trapping efficiency of Chromium - Ferrous bimetal coated ceramic filter is comparatively low and its trapping efficiency is 50.9% at full load.

The pressure drop of Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter was the least at full load and it is 3.15 cm of water column. It is seen that pressure drop increases from 1.2 cm of water column at no load to 4.2 cm of water column at 70% load and then decreases to 3.15 cm of water column at full load because of regeneration of particulates.

The pressure drop of Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter have the same trend.

Brake thermal efficiency was found to decrease by use of ceramic filters and is minimum of 3.65% reduction at full load for Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter.

Smoke intensity was observed to be minimum for Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter and it is 1.52 BSU at full load.

Smoke intensity was found to increase gradually for all filters from no load to full load.

Smoke intensity was reduced more than 63% by the use of ceramic filter with different bimetal combinations.

Chromium - Copper bimetal coated ceramic filter was found to give more favourable results than other bimetal catalyst coated ceramic filters.

References:

  1. MAKOTO HORIUCHI, KOICHI SAITO, and SHOICHI ICHIHARA,"THE effects of flow- through type oxidation catalysts on the particulate reduction of 1990 s diesel engines",SAE 900600,1990.

     
  2. W.R. WADE, J.E.WHITE, J.J. FLOREK and H.A. CIKANEK, " Thermal and catalytic regeneration of diesel particulate traps", SAE 830083,1983. 

     
  3. G.GREEVES and C.H.T. Wang, "Origins of diesel particulate Mass Emissions", SAE 810260,1981.

     
  4. K.N. Pattas and C.C. Michalopoulou, " Catalytic Activity in the Regeneration of the Ceramic Diesel Particulate Trap", SAE 920362,1991.

     
  5. Suresh T.Gulati. " Design Considerations for Diesel Particulate Traps", SAE 920145,1992

Top