An extract from the article entitled "The Migration of Loyalists from South Carolina" by Robert W. Barnwell, Jr. that appeared in the Proceedings of the South Carolina Historical Association for 1937, at pages 37-41 is presented below. These lists are significant because the names of two of the Loyalists sketched at this web site appear on the December 1779 list - Stephen Mayfield and William ("Bloody Bill") Cunningham. I have slightly modified the extract to delete most of the footnote references and correct errors re the number of names on the two proclamation lists, both of which originally were published in the South Carolina and Am. Gen. Gazette, a Whig newspaper of the time.
In
the summer of 1775 the royal governor had succeeded in organizing a considerable
back country following. It was soon crushed and disarmed but several of the
leaders managed to get to Florida, and Thomas Brown and Joseph Robinson were
never captured. Evan McLaurin and Richard Pearis were imprisoned for a time;
they were released soon after the battle of Fort Moultrie and soon thereafter
made their escape to Florida. The Indian country furnished a means by which the
British at Pensacola could communicate with the back country, and through agents
they were able to keep alive their party.
In
1777 the British raised two provincial military organizations in Florida partly
from refugees. At Pensacola John Stuart, the Superintendent of Indian Affairs,
formed the West Florida Rangers. One company was commanded by Richard
Pearis and the other by Alexander Cameron. The latter was a Scotchman
and had been Stuart's deputy to the Cherokee Indians.
At St. Augustine Governor Tonyn raised the Florida Rangers with Thomas
Browne as colonel. It was composed
of residents of Florida as well as of refugees and deserters from Georgia and
the Carolinas.
It
was not until 1778 that large numbers went to Florida.
There had been several unsuccessful attempts or plots to get a large body
of men to escape from the South Carolina back country, but many of the Loyalists
had been disarmed and they were held in check by the Whig militia. In March
1778, the prominent militia leaders were attending a very important meeting of
the legislature. The Loyalists took advantage of their absence and several
groups embodied and joined forces a little above Orangeburg. Two of the leaders
were Benjamin Gregory and John Murphy. They crossed the Savanna River below
Augusta by seizing some trading boats, Though
pursued by the militia of South Carolina and Georgia they reached Florida in
safety. Accounts of their numbers while on the march were put as high as six
hundred but there were a little less than four hundred who arrived safely in
Florida. Three hundred and twenty-eight of them were formed into a provincial
regiment known as the South Carolina Royalists. Joseph
Robinson and Evan McLaurin were made lieutenant-colonel and major
respectively. The test oath is usually considered the reason for this migration
and undoubtedly it was a cause since the dates of the law and the migration
coincide so completely. These men, however, went expressly for the purpose of
forming a regiment, for they had been recruited by agents of Governor Campbell. Alexander Innis, a former British army officer and secretary
of Governor Campbell, was given the title of colonel of the regiment.
Professor
[Wilbur H.] Siebert [in his book Loyalists, Vol. I, pgs 53-54]
distinguishes three large groups of Loyalists that went from South Carolina at
this time, namely:
1)
The one that formed the South Carolina Royalists;
2)
An even larger group known as Scopholites from their leader “Col.
Scophol of the South Carolina militia;”
3)
And a group of about four hundred men led by Colonel Murphy.
The
writer [Robert W. Barnwell] believes that these were all one and the same group,
for all of these bands are reported as passing through Georgia during the one
month of April, and one of the captains of the South Carolina Royalists was John
Murphy. Furthermore
“Scopholite” was the general contemptuous term used for Loyalists in the
backcountry of South Carolina. John
F. Grinke who took part in the expedition against Florida in the summer of 1778
used the term continually in referring to Loyalists. He mentioned a group of
“Scopholites” enlisted in the British service for the war who had been
drilled by Prevost.
Surely, these were the South Carolina Royalists. The British headquarters
papers mentioned only the one group nor do they say anything about a Colonel
Scophol, who was a leader of the anti-regulator faction in South Carolina ten
years before. Scophol or Scoville may have been a Loyalist in the Revolution,
and may have gone to Florida, but there is no evidence that he lead a separate
body of four hundred men.
Many
other Loyalists in South Carolina wished to leave the state, and though most of
them were prevented by the Whig militia, a number of small parties succeeded in
escaping. At this time a Royal
North Carolina regiment was formed in Florida, composed partly of Scotch
Highlanders from that state. In it were refugees from other Southern states,
some of them doubtless from South
Carolina.
In 1779
there was another attempt by a large group to join the British with a very
different result, namely, the Battle of Kettle Creek. About seven hundred men
from South Carolina and North Carolina tried to reach the British who were then
in Georgia. They were defeated by Colonel Pickens just before they reached
safety. Even then about two hundred and fifty escaped to Savannah and were
formed into a second battalion of the South Carolina Royalists. Many prisoners
were captured at Kettle Creek. Seventy-five were tried for treason in the civil
court, twenty-five were condemned and five executed. These migrations were
serious since they furnished the British with recruits. The executions were an
example of terror to stop similar attempts, but were also the beginning of the
hanging practiced by both sides which is such a regrettable feature of the
Revolution.
An
ordinance was passed in 1779 by which the governor was to issue proclamations
calling on persons who had joined the British to return. If they did not do so
their property was to be confiscated. Two such proclamations were issued. One
[taken from the South
Carolina and Am. Gen. Gazette
newspaper, dated 19 November 1779] [proclamation is] dated
November 8. 1779, contains fifty names as follows:
John
Dalrymple |
John
Mahon |
Abraham
Gelge |
James
Harvey |
Hugh
Ferham |
Edward
Layne |
David
Reas |
Abner
Bishop |
Geo.
Dawkins |
James
Teniseley |
Elijah
Bishop |
John
Murphy |
John
Hunter |
Goulding
Bishop |
Wm.
Murphy |
Henry
Green |
John
Otway |
Wm.
Thompson |
Samuel
Proctor |
John
Fridig |
James
Fady |
James
Barton |
Frederick
Richoater |
James
Nealy |
Isaac
Gray |
Nathan
Kuzner |
James
Nealy, Jr. |
Thomas
Elison |
Conrad
Sleice |
Charles
McLellen |
Arthur
Brutcher |
John
Griggory |
James
Daugherty |
John
Boyd |
Benjamin
Griggory |
James
Daugherty, Jr. |
Benjamin
Barton |
John
Livingston |
Alexander
Dayly, Sr. |
Richard
Fowler |
Martin
Livingston |
Alezander
Dayly, Jr. |
John
Speirgen |
James
Wright |
Miles
Busbe |
Tho.
Niveld |
Christopher
Suber |
Henry
Hasten |
|
Gotleb
Suber |
John
Heipe |
The
other proclamation [taken from the South
Carolina and Am. Gen. Gazette
newspaper, dated 17 December 1779] dated
December 16 [1779], contained 40 names as follows:
Randall
Hemes |
Bazil
Lee |
George More |
William
Benson |
Benjamin
Medool |
David
More |
John
Potts |
Barnet
Coller |
Samuel
Smith |
Barnet
Young |
Christopher
Colman |
Philip
Davis, Sr. |
James
Adington |
Zachariah
Beley |
Joshua
Foullous |
Thomas
Jackson |
David
Beley |
Aaron
Spanoson |
William
Lee, Jr. |
William
Deper |
Josiah
Langston |
Nathaniel
Hillon |
Robert
Colman |
John
Tubnure |
Jacob Powell | Timothy Poston | William Cunningham |
Edward
Jirs., Sr. |
John
Mosley |
Daniel
McNilk |
Wm.
Holmes |
John
Emory |
Credily
Weedingham |
William
Wood |
Elijah
Wells |
Robert
Powell |
Daniel Plumer | Stephen Mayfield | William Lee |
John
Hils |
|
|
Many
of these are men who left in 1778. Apparently no immediate steps were taken
towards confiscation, but these proclamations were not forgotten. Over two
years later when the confiscation act of 1782 was passed, these persons were
included, although they were not again listed individually.
[Emphasis added by the webmaster]