Earth: 2025 Talk

Earth: 2025 Talk / Alliance Talk / Missles as retals??

Next 20 Messages

Bass Master
New Member Jul 1st 11:34 AM
What is the verdict gtoing to be? somme people get nailed with a missles as a retal and let it go other says that is a death sentence can everyone clear it up please.

So many clans so many different retal policies..

Can't there just be 1 for everyone??

Mr doobie
Member Jul 1st 11:36 AM
one for everyone??

no but only one for you...from this point out you are only allowed to SS for YOUR retals.....thats it...noting else....failure to comply will result in death.....

Tekko
New Member 0th 12:00 AM
*lol* why try and make a single retal policy, it's so much fun having to deal with every sort...

Al Man
Member Jul 1st 1:06 PM
There is nothing wrong with Missile as a retaliation as long as it is kept 1:1

If somebody have a country around 5000 and a guy from 500 hit him, what else can he do but send a missile? it is only fair!!

The Cloaked
Member Jul 1st 1:07 PM
I agree with al-man

although very few alliances would want to agree to this because they enjoy bottom feeding too much.

Kane
Member Jul 1st 1:51 PM
No missles should only be used for war. I hate being nuked for attacking someone smaller than me. I was ranked in the top 100 at one time, now I'm down in ranking alot because of retards going trigger happy with missles.

Souldealer
Member Jul 1st 3:37 PM
Kane you point out the very reason they SHOULD be used. "Slumming" or "Bottom feeding" is not a riskless option.

marsy
New Member Jul 1st 5:07 PM
kane should have had his sdi up

RaVeS
Member Jul 1st 5:08 PM
BassMaster...noone cares what you think anyway...we will tell you what to think

Diabolic75
Member Jul 1st 5:08 PM
*poop*

roymarr
New Member Jul 1st 10:11 PM
missiles are for war not retals thats the way it was and thats the way it will stay, because unless you want a war your not gonna launch missiles.

klofton
Member Jul 2nd 1:29 AM
yeaa

LuCkY mE
New Member Jul 2nd 1:40 AM
MISSILES MEANS WAR!!!!!!!!
so please dont miss use it....until u want a top alliance going down hard on ur alliance....

dragan
Member Jul 2nd 1:56 AM
i support the idea of missile retal!

Al Man
Member Jul 2nd 3:16 AM
I just went and re-read the whole game help and info pages .. and kept looking for the part where it says "Missile are to be used for war only" , too bad I could not find any reference for that!!

Missiles are very valid retaliation!

Simon
Member Jul 2nd 3:46 AM
i think this topic is up at least once every week......I have said it before, it all depends on your definition of retaliation.

Mercury
Member Jul 2nd 5:19 AM
Missles are a valid retal unless... the country you are retaling has good SDI. High SDI = AB retal. How anyone retals is not up to the aggressor. It is up to the defender. Like the wise and famous Al-Man has stated above, the rules refer to ALL attacks as simply that and say nothing about special attacks are for war. But you must also use common sense and keep the attacks 1:1.

stonies
Member Jul 2nd 5:40 AM
Suspect its a conspiracy among those techers -> to push up SDI price.

Basically, you get practically NOTHING from firin' missles. Hence, its considered an offensive act. Frendly lg and retal shouldn't involve offensive acts (includin' AB, BR, spy ops).

And if this rule is up fer sure, missiles as retaliation, it's gonna spoil the whole landgrabbin' fun. And that's kinda silly.

TMM of Infidels

Ghost
Member Jul 2nd 6:08 AM
"I hate being nuked for attacking someone smaller than me."

*Hands Kane a kleenex*

Mercury
Member Jul 2nd 6:13 AM
Since we are on the missel subject... Small clans here is one you should try more often. Don't you get tired of seeing those same major alliances ranked in the top 10 with all that land? Send them a missel and take the retal.

Now let's have some fun. Let's make a list of everyone that refuses to take a missel.

Next 20 Messages

Bass Master New Member	Jul 1st 11:34 AM What is the verdict gtoing to be? somme people get nailed with a missles as a retal and let it go other says that is a death sentence can everyone clear it up please. So many clans so many different retal policies.. Can't there just be 1 for everyone??
Mr doobie Member	Jul 1st 11:36 AM one for everyone?? no but only one for you...from this point out you are only allowed to SS for YOUR retals.....thats it...noting else....failure to comply will result in death.....
Tekko New Member	0th 12:00 AM lol why try and make a single retal policy, it's so much fun having to deal with every sort...
Al Man Member	Jul 1st 1:06 PM There is nothing wrong with Missile as a retaliation as long as it is kept 1:1 If somebody have a country around 5000 and a guy from 500 hit him, what else can he do but send a missile? it is only fair!!
The Cloaked Member	Jul 1st 1:07 PM I agree with al-man although very few alliances would want to agree to this because they enjoy bottom feeding too much.
Kane Member	Jul 1st 1:51 PM No missles should only be used for war. I hate being nuked for attacking someone smaller than me. I was ranked in the top 100 at one time, now I'm down in ranking alot because of retards going trigger happy with missles.
Souldealer Member	Jul 1st 3:37 PM Kane you point out the very reason they SHOULD be used. "Slumming" or "Bottom feeding" is not a riskless option.
marsy New Member	Jul 1st 5:07 PM kane should have had his sdi up
RaVeS Member	Jul 1st 5:08 PM BassMaster...noone cares what you think anyway...we will tell you what to think
Diabolic75 Member	Jul 1st 5:08 PM *poop*
roymarr New Member	Jul 1st 10:11 PM missiles are for war not retals thats the way it was and thats the way it will stay, because unless you want a war your not gonna launch missiles.
klofton Member	Jul 2nd 1:29 AM yeaa
LuCkY mE New Member	Jul 2nd 1:40 AM MISSILES MEANS WAR!!!!!!!! so please dont miss use it....until u want a top alliance going down hard on ur alliance....
dragan Member	Jul 2nd 1:56 AM i support the idea of missile retal!
Al Man Member	Jul 2nd 3:16 AM I just went and re-read the whole game help and info pages .. and kept looking for the part where it says "Missile are to be used for war only" , too bad I could not find any reference for that!! Missiles are very valid retaliation!
Simon Member	Jul 2nd 3:46 AM i think this topic is up at least once every week......I have said it before, it all depends on your definition of retaliation.
Mercury Member	Jul 2nd 5:19 AM Missles are a valid retal unless... the country you are retaling has good SDI. High SDI = AB retal. How anyone retals is not up to the aggressor. It is up to the defender. Like the wise and famous Al-Man has stated above, the rules refer to ALL attacks as simply that and say nothing about special attacks are for war. But you must also use common sense and keep the attacks 1:1.
stonies Member	Jul 2nd 5:40 AM Suspect its a conspiracy among those techers -> to push up SDI price. Basically, you get practically NOTHING from firin' missles. Hence, its considered an offensive act. Frendly lg and retal shouldn't involve offensive acts (includin' AB, BR, spy ops). And if this rule is up fer sure, missiles as retaliation, it's gonna spoil the whole landgrabbin' fun. And that's kinda silly. TMM of Infidels
Ghost Member	Jul 2nd 6:08 AM "I hate being nuked for attacking someone smaller than me." Hands Kane a kleenex
Mercury Member	Jul 2nd 6:13 AM Since we are on the missel subject... Small clans here is one you should try more often. Don't you get tired of seeing those same major alliances ranked in the top 10 with all that land? Send them a missel and take the retal. Now let's have some fun. Let's make a list of everyone that refuses to take a missel.