Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 05:00:20 -0700
From: randerson22@home.com ("Robert Anderson")
Subject: Re: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw Revisions]
To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com


Tim
    I already have and you seem to skip right over the
point I made to Paul and the list. You know why the
ratification bylaw was passed. It was to prevent a
repeat of the Tucson convention were the whole party
structure was attempted to be replaced. The counties
were never meant to go over all the little changes one
at a time and vote on them. to do this would make the
bylaws unworkable were some counties voted for one
thing and other counties voted for another when some of
the bylaws changes depend on one another. It just won't
work and was never meant to. And what really gets me is
that you are once again trying to change the meaning of
a Bylaw from what you know was the intent when it was
passed. First you are wrong and second you are not in
the position to make that decision. Please stick to the
job of secretary you seem to be having a tough enough
time with those responsibilities without taking on
things you are not responsible for.
    And speaking of that would you please answer the
formal request I made to you as to the status of the
now very late notice to Pima county. Are you going to
perform the notice as the govcom had asked you to do
months ago and if not please forward the contact
information to the list so that someone else can do
your job correctly now that e find ourselves in the
very position we were trying to avoid when you were
asked to contact them. This by the way is something
that falls under the job of the Secretary. And Jason
who is not a member of the Govcom asking Pima to
forward the bylaws does not meet the formal notice that
the Govcom needs for their decision making it needs to
come from the Govcom. That should mean you.



Bob


----- Original Message -----
From: <RegistrLBT@aol.com>
To: <lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw
Revisions]


>        OFFENSE:     Justify your position. What is

the source and rationale
> for this newly minted requirement that the amendments

be considered en bloc?
> All of you have yet to explain where this idea

originated.
>

>

>



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpaz-govcom-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/