Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:00:05 -0700
From: azfreelaw@yahoo.com ("Andreasen")
Subject: RE: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw Revisions]
To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
Folks,
We are skipping over some very important points from other messages that
have yet to be answered. First, Tim, WHY did you not provide COPIES of the
Bushkin letter at the last GovCom? I provided copies of John Buttrick's
letter regarding the Jason Auvenshine situation---yt YOU do not HAVE that
as part of YOUR job title? We diddle with YOUR Resolutions but YOU do not
HAVE to make copies so others can individually READ what they are voting on?
Yet at the convention, these things are written down and voted on??? I am
putting you on notice that I want PRINTED COPIES of the letter from Bushkin
FOR EVERYONE ON THE GOVCOM---PUTTING IT ON THE WEB OR EMAIL IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE.
As Secretary, you will send WRITTEN, stamped notice to those people you are
so directed to send information r requests for information to. You were
directed to contact and receive information from the county chairs, and mail
was certainly part of this. You were given until the next Govcom to do so,
and we being the flexible group we have always been, made the assumption
that YOU would do your job and give a damn about the folks--up here--that
are involved.
Tim, you are not above everyone else. There are no "special rules just for
Tim." You will provide written and copied data and information to this
group. You will provide copies of the Bushkin letter and you will STOP your
interpretive dance with truth! Either you collect information, disseminate
information, and provide information or you are a bottleneck thru which
information NEVER gets through.
You WILL provide the database information on Pima County in WRITTEN form,
and provided it to Bob Anderson in his capacity of Vice-Chair and to me. I
will be happy to cover the costs of postage---just make a request to the
Treasurer for a disbursement of funds for postage.
Liz
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Anderson [mailto:randerson22@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 12:05 PM
To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw Revisions]
----- Original Message -----
From: <RegistrLBT@aol.com>
To: <lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw
Revisions]
> Your argument has some validity. However, it
doesn't change the
> meaning of the provision.
Again Tim "so says you. You are nobody but the
Secretary. You are not the authority on the Bylaws and
constitution. And the meaning and intent of the
counties ratifying was to for them to give nod to the
convention not relive it word by word And I suppose
that we're all going to have to be inconvenienced again
to have a special Govcom meeting so we can tell you
what you and we all know was what the convention
wanted.
>
> The intent was, as you said, to prevent
wholesale takeover at the
> convention. That it does, and I'm not trying to
change it. It does, however,
> have the unexpected, and not entirely unwelcome,
effect of allowing the
> county parties to pass judgment on the constitutional
and bylaws amendments.
No Tim what was unexpected was that the Secretary of
the party would continually try to read different
meanings into the Bylaws and Constitution when unhappy
with the provision even when the intent is known.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpaz-govcom-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpaz-govcom-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/