Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:27:37 -0000 From: auvenj@mailcity.com Subject: [lpaz-discuss] Re: My interpretation -- FWIW To: lpaz-discuss@yahoogroups.com Reply-To: lpaz-discuss@yahoogroups.com
Tim and all,
Perusing my email, Peter is claiming a complete victory (ie they ruled in favor of Inc. on the question of merger). I haven't seen a file like the PDF backing it up...just passing along what I know.
--Jason Auvenshine
--- In lpaz-discuss@y..., RegistrLBT@a... wrote: > Dear Friends:
>
> I've just completed reading the partial decision by the Court of
> Appeals. My conclusion is -- it's not that bad. The only place where the COP
> decision went beyond the Superior Court decision was in the finding that we
> were required at all times after ballot status to comply with the law. On
> this count, the only possible remedy I see for the Court is to deny us access
> to the two-year old voter disk that the State and Maricopa County deposited
> with the court (big deal) bcause that is all that the suit was originally
> about.
>
> In the mean time, we LOST ballot status and are no longer required to
> even have a State Committee until we regain it. Even if we do get it back for
> 2002, we will not fall under the requirements until after next year's
> elections.
>
> The only worrisome aspects of this case are
> 1) The court did not specify a remedy. This could mean either that it will
> all be spelled out when the minute entry on Count One comes back, or
> 2) that they've already decided in favor of Inc. and remedy is a moot
> point.
>
> Tim
Community email addresses: Post message: lpaz-discuss@onelist.com Subscribe: lpaz-discuss-subscribe@onelist.com Unsubscribe: lpaz-discuss-unsubscribe@onelist.com List owner: lpaz-discuss-owner@onelist.com Web site: www.ArizonaLibertarian.org
Shortcut URL to this page: http://www.onelist.com/community/lpaz-discuss
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/