Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 02:10:11 -0000
From: pls@thekeep.com
Subject: [lpaz-govcom] Re: disaffiliating Pima
To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com


Woah, Jason. So far you're the only one who has said anything about 
disaffiliaitng Pima. I'm just asking Tim as secretary if they are in 
compliance with the bylaws as an affiliate and if not, what do they 
need. There is a open issue here we've been tactily ignoring so far. 
And with the bylaws ratification i can no long be ignored.

    ++PLS

--- In lpaz-govcom@y..., "Jason Auvenshine" <auvenj@m...> wrote:
> Bob,

> 

> My point was that it doesn't really matter whether or not Tim sent 

something...if he sends it directly to the Pima Chair I can almost 
guerantee the result will be not be a positive response, which means 
ALP will end up disaffiliating Pima.  In order to avoid that 
situation, which would play right into Peter's desire to _isolate_ 
Pima folks from ALP, I suggested an alternative:  Let me kow what is 
required and I will make a formal request of the chair as a Pima LP 
member.
> 

> Why is everybody in such a damn hurry to disaffiliate one of the 

most, if not _the_ most, active county parties in the state?  I would 
think that all available avenues (such as the one I am suggesting) 
would be exhausted before that would take place.
> 

> Everyone knows of the hostility between the two sides and the 

historical alignment of the county parties.  Any demand from ALP, 
Inc. upon MCLP would probablybe...ignored or refused.  Guess what:  
any demand from ALP upon PCLP will probably be...ignored or refused.  
Nobody should find that surprising.  It doesn't take a genius to see 
that the only way to get this done is going to be via some other 
mechanism than a DIRECT demand from ALP upon the Pima chair.  I am 
offering to be that mechanism.
> 

> A disaffiliation of Pima would serve only to further divide and 

alienate the Libertarians in this state.  Is that what you want?  If 
not, then at least let me attmpt to use my status as a PCLP member 
and contributor to get what is needed to fulfill the ALP bylaws 
requirements so PCLP can remain affiliated.
> 

> --Jason Auvenshine

> 

> 

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:58:13  

>  Robert Anderson wrote:

> >Jason

> >    The request for the proper information should have

> >already been made. At this time we are trying to

> >ascertain if this was done as requested. And will deal

> >with the problem as needed if there is one.

> >

> >

> >Thanks Bob

> >

> >

> >

> >----- Original Message -----

> >From: <auvenj@m...>

> >To: <lpaz-govcom@y...>

> >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:21 AM

> >Subject: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw Revisions]

> >

> >

> >> IMHO ALP disaffiliating Pima would play right into

> >Peter's strength

> >> and solidify his support.  I can scream all day long

> >that it was a

> >> technical bylaws matter and people will still think

> >that it was for

> >> philosophical purity and the Hoffman campaign.

> >

> >

> >

> 

> 

> Get 250 color business cards for FREE!

> http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpaz-govcom-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/