Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:07:22 EDT
From: RegistrLBT@aol.com
Subject: Re: [lpaz-govcom] [Fwd: Re: Draft Bylaw Revisions]
To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com

In a message dated 6/26/2001 2:47:28 AM US Mountain Standard Time, pls@thekeep.com writes:

> BTW, am I the only one bothered by Tim making a separate ratification
> vote for every changed wod or phrase?
>

Dear Paul:

I think not. Liz brought up the subject as well. However, there is no indication in any of the ALP's governing documents or authorities that amendments, which were considered and passed separately, must be ratified by the counties en banc. If that was your intention in drafting the amendment then it should have stated that the county steering committees must ratify them "en banc" or "en bloc."

Please also remember that 1) if they are to be ratiied en banc, you increase the chances that all will be rejected, and 2) the GovCom interpreted several amendments that I drafted in ways that I never envisioned.

Tim


Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Check out Atheists United - Arizona
Visit my atheist friends at Heritics, Atheists, Skeptics, Humanists, Infidels, and Secular Humanists - Arizona
Arizona Secular Humanists
Paul Putz Cooks the Arizona Secular Humanist's Check Book
News about crimes commited by the police and government
News about crimes commited by religious leaders and beleivers
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!
Libertarians talk about freedom