Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 00:18:40 -0400
To: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com>
From: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com>
Subject: Colombia Faces Strong Push To Legalize Drugs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

Pubdate: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 Source: Financial Times (UK) Copyright: The Financial Times Limited 2001 Contact: letters.editor@ft.com Website: http://www.ft.com/ Author: James Wilson

COLOMBIA FACES STRONG PUSH TO LEGALISE DRUGS

A growing number of influential Colombians, sickened by the damage that drugs trafficking is doing to their country, are stepping up criticism of US-backed counter-narcotics policies and pushing for legalisation of drugs as a solution.

Colombia at times has been treated like a pariah because it is the source of most of the world's cocaine and a growing amount of heroin. But advocates of an end to prohibition contend that Colombia - ravaged by some of the world's worst violence and insecurity - is itself the biggest casualty of the "war on drugs".

Global prohibition, they say, has driven the trade's huge profits and given drug traffickers the wealth and power to corrupt or murder anyone who stood in their way. Over the past two decades, hundreds of leading politicians, judges, police, and soldiers have died trying to confront Colombia's violent and wealthy drugs cartels.

Profits from drugs have also become a vital source of financing for the country's guerrilla and paramilitary groups - even though the rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) say they also favour drugs legalisation.

Colombia's civil war has been compared to some African conflicts that are fuelled by the struggle to control trade in diamonds or other valuable natural resources.

"From the 1990s onwards, the guerrillas and paramilitaries have grown incredibly because of the money coming from narco-trafficking," says senator Viviane Morales, author of a bill that calls for drug legalisation. "The main ally of narco-trafficking is prohibition."

Such arguments have gathered force in recent weeks. Various other parliamentarians want to ease curbs on drugs, while some provincial governors have also spoken up in favour of decriminalising the drugs trade. They say it could help to solve Colombia's conflict by cutting away at its financial support.

The huge state resources now being devoted to curbing drugs trafficking could also be used to improve social conditions, they argue - reducing support for the armed insurgency.

A former UK ambassador to Colombia has also said the country's interests would be better served by legalisation than by an unwinnable drugs war.

Such calls fly in the face of the tough measures being promoted by the US in Colombia with the co-operation of President Andres Pastrana's government. Under a $1.3bn (?900m) package of largely military aid from the US, thousands of hectares of illegal coca and poppy crops, which produce the raw ingredients for cocaine and heroin, are being destroyed with aerial spraying of herbicide.

The US insists this aggressive campaign poses no threat to human or environmental well-being. But the swooping of the crop-spraying aircraft over poor rural communities, wiping out livelihoods, is proving controversial and has stimulated the current legalisation debate, emboldening those who favour an end to prohibition.

But the efforts of Ms Morales and others are unlikely to succeed. They do not enjoy backing from the government. Nor have any leading presidential candidates for next year's elections supported legalisation, although Luis Eduardo Garzon, a leftwing trade unionist candidate who trails in polls, is a supporter.

"I'm against legalisation and frankly it seems useless to me to argue that decision from Colombia," said Horacio Serpa, the well-supported candidate from Ms Morales' own Liberal party, in his regular magazine column.

Even many supporters of legalisation admit a unilateral decriminalisation by Colombia would have little or no effect.

However, Guillermo Gaviria, governor of powerful Antioquia province, says Colombia should use its "moral authority" to lead international debate on legalisation. "Colombia cannot go on being the victim of the wrong, shortsighted attitude of countries that judge us superficially," he says. "Our society didn't choose to be part of the conflict."

Gustavo Socha, director of the anti-narcotics police, has written that legalisation of drugs "would betray the sacrifice" of the hundreds who have died trying to battle the cartels. But Ms Morales says: "We cannot go on counting the deaths of the past to justify the deaths of the future. We need to stop this war, quickly." For regional reports, http://www.ft.com/americas


Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. ---


Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt@coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week) Matthew Gaylor, (614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/


Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Check out Atheists United - Arizona
Visit my atheist friends at Heritics, Atheists, Skeptics, Humanists, Infidels, and Secular Humanists - Arizona
Arizona Secular Humanists
Paul Putz Cooks the Arizona Secular Humanist's Check Book
News about crimes commited by the police and government
News about crimes commited by religious leaders and beleivers
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!
Libertarians talk about freedom