Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 00:22:25 -0400 To: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com> From: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com> Subject: Who's Spying On Judges? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:20:05 -0400 From: "James M. Ray" <jray@free-market.net> Subject: WHO'S SPYING ON JUDGES?
WHO'S SPYING ON JUDGES?
Chamber Music by Jeffrey Rosen
The New Republic - Post date 08.30.01, Issue date 09.10.01
http://www.tnr.com/091001/rosen091001.html
Federal judges are about to make a crucial decision on workplace privacy, but you won't read about it in a court opinion. On September 11, the Judicial Conference of the United States, the organization with ultimate authority over the internal operation of the federal courts, will decide whether to approve or dismantle a computer program that monitors judges and their staff members when they use the Internet on the job. Defenders of the program say judges should accept the same invasions of privacy their decisions have imposed on other American workers.
But the truth is that the courts haven't ruled definitively on whether Internet browsing and e-mail should be treated as public or private. And so the judges face a momentous choice. If they turn off the monitoring software, the members of the Judicial Conference--composed of 27 judges of the federal appellate and district courts--can set an example that will help other employers resist the relentless expansion of Internet monitoring that is transforming the American workplace. But if they meekly surrender their own liberties, the judges will accelerate the entrenchment of a surveillance state.
[...]
Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt@coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week) Matthew Gaylor, (614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/