Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:15:34 -0400
To: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com>
From: Matthew Gaylor <freematt@coil.com>
Subject: Defeatist Compromising Commentary From Reason Magazine
Cc: gillespie@reason.com, davidn@reason.org, tcmay@got.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

[Note from Matthew Gaylor:  Again more defeatist compromising 
commentary.  Reason Magazine's contributing editor Cathy Young 
writes: "Do I like the idea of people being able to encrypt 
electronic communications so that they are beyond surveillance? 
Frankly, I found it scary even before Sept. 11 - precisely because of 
the threat of terrorism. It is said that there are no atheists in 
foxholes; perhaps there are no true libertarians in times of 
terrorist attacks.  Even in the Declaration of Independence, the 
right to liberty is preceded by the right to life." In this case I 
found Cypherpunk Tim May's <tcmay@got.net> sarcastic comment right on 
the money.  Tim writes:  "Between Cato arguing for victim disarmament 
and Reason arguing that "right to liberty is preceded by the right to 
life," I say we just kill them all and let Rand sort them out."  If 
you find Ms. Young's comments against encryption disturbing please 
write to Nick Gillespie <gillespie@reason.com> Editor-in-Chief of 
Reason Magazine and David Nott <davidn@reason.org> President, Reason 
Foundation.]

<http://www.reason.com/cy/cy092401.html>


September 24, 2001

Civil liberties may take a hit

By Cathy Young

It's such a cliche to say that the reality hasn't sunk in yet -- but 
it's true. Despite all the devastating images, part of me still 
doesn't belive that the Twin Towers are no more, or that the station 
where I have so often arrived in downtown New York by local train 
station from New Jersey lies under a pile of rubble, or that 
thousands are dead in what is unquestionably the most devastating 
terrorist act ever committed, not just on American soil but anywhere.

And there are so many other cliches that come so easily right now and 
that are true: above all, that the world will never be the same.

As always, there are those who would exploit an unthinkable tragedy 
for their own hateful agendas. On the left, a few commentators, such 
as filmmaker-activist Michael Moore, have found this a good time to 
decry the sins of American capitalism and US foreign policy for which 
we are supposedly being punished by the world's dispossessed.

On the right, a few so-called men of God have found this a good time 
to decry the "wickedness" of gays and lesbians, feminists, the 
American Civil Liberties Union, and abortion providers, for which we 
are supposedly being punished by the Lord.

So far, however, the divisive rhetoric isn't finding many takers.

Americans are united in mourning and just anger. The way we have come 
together to help and support those affected by the horror of last 
week's bombings shows us at our best as a people.

And yet moments of national unity and resolve are always of concern 
to those of us who are concerned with the expanding powers of the 
state and the fate of individual rights and civil liberties.

Historically, individual freedom has not fared well in wartime, 
understandably so. And whatever military action we may take at the 
moment, one of the fears is that a war against terrorism may be, at 
least for the foreseeable future, a permanent war.

There are libertarians who say that it doesn't have to be that way. 
They argue that, if our government only withdrew from meddling in 
regions where we have no real interest, stop playing global 
policeman, and limited itself to providing for a national defense 
against foreign attack, we wouldn't be a terrorist target.

Alas, this is a myopic position. Aside from whether a 21st century 
democracy can survive in isolation, the sort of people who carried 
out this monstrous act hate us for much more than our foreign policy.

Note that their targets included not only the Pentagon and 
(apparently) Capitol Hill or the White House, but the World Trade 
Center - a symbol and a bastion of international capitalism, not of 
US military power.

Philosopher David Kelley, director of the Objectivist Center, makes 
this point eloquently in an essay on the center's Web site, "The 
Assault on Civilization." (which strikes a chord whether or not one 
shares the center's philosophy, based on the writings of Ayn Rand).

The fanatics behind the bombings, Kelley writes, hate the West's 
cultural power most - "our secular culture of freedom, reason, and 
the pursuit of happiness. They hate our individualism; what they want 
is an authoritarian society where thought and behavior are controlled 
by true believers."

We could stay out of world affairs and they would still hate and fear 
our influence.

What to do, then?

To sacrifice our freedoms to fear of terrorism would destroy the very 
way of life that we seek to protect and hand the terrorists a 
victory. On the other hand, a free society is not a suicide pact.

We will undoubtedly have to put up with tougher security at airports. 
The movements of foreign visitors will be scrutinized more closely. 
Perhaps most alarming to many civil libertarians, it's likely that 
the government will expand its ability to monitor electronic mail, 
which has been a controversial issue for some time.

Do I like the idea of the government intercepting e-mail? No. But, as 
long as there's judicial oversight and due process, that's no 
different from its longstanding power to intercept regular mail.

Do I like the idea of people being able to encrypt electronic 
communications so that they are beyond surveillance? Frankly, I found 
it scary even before Sept. 11 - precisely because of the threat of 
terrorism.

It is said that there are no atheists in foxholes; perhaps there are 
no true libertarians in times of terrorist attacks.

Even in the Declaration of Independence, the right to liberty is 
preceded by the right to life.

Cathy Young is a contributing editor to REASON.  This column appeared 
in the Boston Globe on September 19, 2001.


Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
---


Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues
Send a blank message to: freematt@coil.com with the words subscribe FA
on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week)
Matthew Gaylor, (614) 313-5722  ICQ: 106212065   Archived at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/