What are the Criteria for determining the likely origin of physical evidence?

Please view Dr. Royston's Treatse on Physical Evidence...

1) Is it POSSIBLE to imitate (manufacture) the RR3 material on Earth?

To put it plainly, it IS POSSIBLE, but expensive to create a material with non-natural isotopic abundances. It seems most plausible that if one were to try and fake the silicon ratios, the other elements, found only in very minor concentrations, would have terrestrial abundances. If anyone tells you the isotopic ratios "can't be altered" then don't believe them.

There is a small group of individuals struggling with understanding the difficulty of human manufacture of the object right now.

 

2) Who are the other people upon who's work I am relying in the statements I made? Who else may be interested in getting involved?

I made an agreement to subject the other researchers to the same harrasment/hassle that I'm undergoing until they were satisfied and ready to submit the work for publication. I presented data because I'd agreed to when given the material to analyze. I would have prefered to wait and hope I've learned a huge lesson. However, there are at least three researchers (and dozens of 'regular folks') whom I would have never corresponded with if I had kept my mouth shut until the paper was accepted for publication.